Sanctius’ Minerva of 1562 and the Evolution of His Linguistic Theory
The 1587 edition of Sanctius’ Minerva was not the first edition: a 1562 version has recently been discovered. This paper outlines Sanctius’ linguistic theory as it is advanced in the earlier version and traces its evolution. Some aspects of Sanctius’ system are briefly considered with relation to his immediate predecessors Linacre, Scaliger, and Ramus. I attempt to show that the basic tenets of his theory are already present in the early work: his conception of grammar, the importance of his logical rules (rationes), and his abstract notion of ellipsis as an essential mechanism for positing underlying structures and general rules, as well as for explaining obscure syntactic constructions. His views on the noun and the constructio of nouns, on verbs and the constructio of verbs are presented in an effort to show his evolution towards a more simple and general system of language. No attempt is made to cover those aspects of his theory which appear only in the later Minerva.
Published online: 01 January 1975
Bell, Aubrey (Fitz Gerald
Brekle, Herbert E.
Butler, H(arold) E(dgeworth
Cervanfes, (Saavedra), Miguel de
Del Estal Fuentes, Eduardo
Horace (= Quintus Horatius Flaccus, 65–8 B.C.)
Liaño Pacheco, Jesús Marĭa
Mayans y Siscar, Gregorio
Ong, Walter J.
Percival, W. Keith
Forthcoming a. “Deep and Surface Structure Concepts in Renaissance Medieval Syntactic Theory”. History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics ed. by Herman Parret Berlin & New York W. de Gruyter
Forthcoming b. “The Renaissance: The grammatical tradition and the rise of the vernaculars”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok vol. 13 Historiography of Linguistics The Hague Mouton
Ramus, Petrus (= Pierre de La Ramée
Sanctius, Franciscus (= Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas
Sandys, Sir John E(dwin
Scaglione, Aldo D.
Scaliger, Julius Caesar
Cited by 5 other publications
Claramonte, Manuel Breva
Read, Malcolm K.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.