Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 2:1 (1975) ► pp.49–66

Sanctius’ Minerva of 1562 and the Evolution of His Linguistic Theory

| University of Colorado
The 1587 edition of Sanctius’ Minerva was not the first edition: a 1562 version has recently been discovered. This paper outlines Sanctius’ linguistic theory as it is advanced in the earlier version and traces its evolution. Some aspects of Sanctius’ system are briefly considered with relation to his immediate predecessors Linacre, Scaliger, and Ramus. I attempt to show that the basic tenets of his theory are already present in the early work: his conception of grammar, the importance of his logical rules (rationes), and his abstract notion of ellipsis as an essential mechanism for positing underlying structures and general rules, as well as for explaining obscure syntactic constructions. His views on the noun and the constructio of nouns, on verbs and the constructio of verbs are presented in an effort to show his evolution towards a more simple and general system of language. No attempt is made to cover those aspects of his theory which appear only in the later Minerva.
Published online: 1 January 1975
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.2.1.04bre
References (26)
References
Barwick, Karl (b.1883), ed. 1925. Flavii Sosipatri Charisii Artis grammaticae libri V. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (2nd ed., with corrections by Friedmar Kühnert, 1964.)Google Scholar
Bell, Aubrey (Fitz Gerald, 1822–1950). 1925. Francisco Sánchez, el Brocense. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press & M. Milford.Google Scholar
Brekle, Herbert E., ed. 1966 [1676]. Grammaire génerale et raisonnée; ou, La Grammaire de Port-Royal. 21 vols. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holz-boog.Google Scholar
Butler, H(arold) E(dgeworth, b. 1878), ed. 1966. The Institutio oratoria of Quintilian. With an E. transl. 21 vols. London: W. Heinemann. (First published in 1921–22.)Google Scholar
Cervanfes, (Saavedra), Miguel de (1547–1616). 1914. Obras completas: Galatea. 21 vols. Madrid: B. Rodríguez.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jean-Claude. 1968. Histoire de la syntaxe: Naissance de la notion de complément dans la grammaire française (1530–1750). Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Del Estal Fuentes, Eduardo. Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas: Minerva 1562. (Ph.D. dissertation to appear in Publicaciones de la Universidad de Salamanca. This work will include an annotated edition of the 1562 Minerva.)Google Scholar
Horace (= Quintus Horatius Flaccus, 65–8 B.C.). 1966. Satires. Fr. transl. ed. by Paul Lejay. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
. 1885. Carmina. Ed. by Lucian Müller (1836–98). Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1969. Review of Brekle 1966. Lg 45:2.343–64.Google Scholar
Liaño Pacheco, Jesús Marĭa. 1971. Sanctius, el Brocense. Madrid: Aldus S.A. (Diss., Univ. of Salamanca, 1963.)Google Scholar
Linacre, Thomas (1460?-1524). 1557 [1524]. De emendata structura latini sermonis libri sex. Venice: P. Manuntius. (Also, Paris: C. Wechel, 1541.)Google Scholar
Mayans y Siscar, Gregorio (1699–1781). 1766. Francisci Sanctii Brocensis Opera Omnia. 41 vols. Geneva: Fratres de Tourmes.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 1958. Ramus: Method, and the decay of dialogue; from the art of discourse to the art of reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith. Forthcoming a. “Deep and Surface Structure Concepts in Renaissance Medieval Syntactic Theory”. History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics ed. by Herman Parret. Berlin & New York: W. de Gruyter.
. Forthcoming b. “The Renaissance: The grammatical tradition and the rise of the vernaculars”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. 131: Historiography of Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.
Quintilian(us), Marcus Fabius (35-C.95 A.D.). Institutio oratoria, see Butler 1966.Google Scholar
Ramus, Petrus (= Pierre de La Ramée, 1515–72). 1581. Scholae in tres primas liberales artes. Frankfort/M.: A. Wechel. (Facs.-repr., Frankfort/M.: Minerva, 1965.)Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. 1974. “Theory-Orientation versus Data-Orientation”. HL 1:1.11–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanctius, Franciscus (= Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas, 1523–1601). 1562a. Institutions. Lyon: S. Gryphius.Google Scholar
, 1523–1601). 1562b. Minerva; seu, De linguae latinae causis et elegantia.. Ibid.Google Scholar
, 1523–1601). 1587. Minerva; seu. De causis linguae latinae. Salamanca: J. & A. Renaut.Google Scholar
Sandys, Sir John E(dwin, 1844–1922). 1903. The History of Classical Scholarship. Vol. I1. Cambridge Univ. Press. (3rd ed., 1920; repr. New York: Hafner, 1958.)Google Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo D. 1972. The Classical Theory of Composition, from its origins to the present: A historical survey. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar (1484–1558). 1584. De causis linguae latinae: Libri tredecim. Heidelberg: P. Santandreamus. (1st ed., Lyon: S. Gryphius, 1540.)Google Scholar
Tovar, Antonio, and Miguel de la Pinta Llorente. 1941. Procesos inquisitoriales contra Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Inves-tigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Rooy, Raf Van
2020. An ablative for the Greeks?. Historiographia Linguistica 47:2-3 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Claramonte, Manuel Breva
1984. The semiotic aspects of Sanctius’ Minerva . Historiographia Linguistica 11:1-2 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Sarmiento, Ramón
1984. The grammatical doctrine of the Real Acadedemia Española (1854). Historiographia Linguistica 11:1-2 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Joly, André
1977.  Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: The Latin Tradition. By G. Arthur Padley. Historiographia Linguistica 4:3 ► pp. 392 ff. DOI logo
Read, Malcolm K.
1977. Linguistic Theory and the Problem of Mutism. Historiographia Linguistica 4:3 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.