Cover not available
Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 2:1 (1975) ► pp.102–110
Besprechung

Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas: The origins of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in German thought. By Julia M[yrle] Penn

Reviewed by
| Università di Pavia

Article language: German

Published online: 1 January 1975
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.2.1.11con
References

Bibliographie

Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan (Ignacy Niecisɫaw
1845–1929). 1929 “Einfluss der Sprache auf Weltanschauung und Stimmung”. PF 141.184–255.Google Scholar
Baumann, Hans-Heinrich
1971 “Die generative Grammatik und Wilhelm von Humboldt”. Poetica 41.1–12.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, Ludwig von
1955 “An Essay on the Relativity of Categories”. Philosophy of Science 221.243–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bierwlsch, Manfred
1971 Modern Linguistics: Its development, methods and problems. Den Haag: Mouton.Google Scholar
Black, Max
1959 “Linguistic Relativity: The views of Benjamin Lee Whorf.” Philosophical Review. 681.228–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger Langham
1967 Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Conception of Linguistic Relativity. Den Haag: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger W(illiam), und Eric H(einz) Lenneberg
1958 “Studies in Linguistic Relativity”. In: MacCoby, et al. 1958.8–18.Google Scholar
Carroll, John-B(issel), und Joseph B(artholomew) Casagrande
1958 “The Function of Language Classification in Behavior.” In: MacCoby, et al. 1958.18–31.Google Scholar
Christmann, Hans Helmut
1974 Idealistische Philologie und moderne Sprachwissenschaft. München: W. Fink.Google Scholar
Conte, Maria-Elisabeth
1973 “Wilhelm von Humboldt nella linguistica con-temporanea : Bibliografia ragionata 1960–1972”. LeSt 8:1.127–65.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1970 “Semantik, innere Sprachform und Tiefenstruktur”. FoL 4:1/2.53–63.Google Scholar
Feuer, Lewis S(amuel)
1953 “Sociological Aspects of the Relation between Language and Philosophy”. Philosophy of Science 201.85–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gipper, Helmut
1972 Gibt es ein sprachliches Relativitätsprinzip? Untersuchungen zur Sapir-Whorf-Hypothese. Frankfurt/M.: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
Hook, Sidney
Hrg. 1969 Language and Philosophy: A symposium. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Humboldt, (Friedrich) Wilhelm (Christian Karl Ferdinand, Freiherr) von
(1767–1835). 1963 [1820–35]  Werke hgg. von Andreas Flitner und Klaus Giel, Bd. 31: Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftl. Buchgesellschaft; Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta; Berlin: Rütten & Loening. (4. Aufl. 1972).Google Scholar
Koerner, E(rnst) F(rideryk) K(onrad)
1974 “The Humboldtian Trend in Linguistics”. Papier zum 9. Linguistischen Kolloquium. Bielefeld 27.-30. August 1974.Google Scholar
Kutschera, Franz von
1971 Sprachphilosophie. München: W. Fink. (2nd rev. ed. 1974.)Google Scholar
Lee, D(orothy) Demetracopoulou
1938 “Conceptual Implications of an Indian Language”. Philosophy of Science 5:1.89–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1968 Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacCoby, Eleanor E., et al.
Hrgg. 1958 Readings in Social Psychology. 3. Aufl. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Miller, Robert L(ee)
1968 The Linguistic Relativity Principle and Humboldtian Ethnolinguistics. Den Haag: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penn, Julia Myrle
1966 Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas: The origins of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in German thought of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Diss., Austin, Tex.: Univ. of Texas. Masch.-Schr., v + 79 S.Google Scholar
Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio
1973 Ideologies of Linguistic Relativity. Den Haag: Mouton.Google Scholar
Slagle, Uhlan V(on)
1974 “The Kantian Influence on Humboldt’s Linguistic Thought”. HL 1:3.341–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar