Cover not available
Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 2:1 (1975) ► pp.102–110
Besprechung

Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas: The origins of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in German thought. By Julia M[yrle] Penn

Reviewed by
| Università di Pavia

Article language: German

Published online: 1 January 1975
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.2.1.11con
References (24)
Bibliographie
Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan (Ignacy Niecisɫaw, 1845–1929). 1929. “Einfluss der Sprache auf Weltanschauung und Stimmung”. PF 141.184–255.Google Scholar
Baumann, Hans-Heinrich. 1971. “Die generative Grammatik und Wilhelm von Humboldt”. Poetica 41.1–12.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. 1955. “An Essay on the Relativity of Categories”. Philosophy of Science 221.243–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bierwlsch, Manfred. 1971. Modern Linguistics: Its development, methods and problems. Den Haag: Mouton.Google Scholar
Black, Max. 1959. “Linguistic Relativity: The views of Benjamin Lee Whorf.” Philosophical Review. 681.228–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger Langham. 1967. Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Conception of Linguistic Relativity. Den Haag: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger W(illiam), und Eric H(einz) Lenneberg. 1958. “Studies in Linguistic Relativity”. In: MacCoby, et al. 1958.8–18.Google Scholar
Carroll, John-B(issel), und Joseph B(artholomew) Casagrande. 1958. “The Function of Language Classification in Behavior.” In: MacCoby, et al. 1958.18–31.Google Scholar
Christmann, Hans Helmut. 1974. Idealistische Philologie und moderne Sprachwissenschaft. München: W. Fink.Google Scholar
Conte, Maria-Elisabeth. 1973. “Wilhelm von Humboldt nella linguistica con-temporanea : Bibliografia ragionata 1960–1972”. LeSt 8:1.127–65.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1970. “Semantik, innere Sprachform und Tiefenstruktur”. FoL 4:1/2.53–63.Google Scholar
Feuer, Lewis S(amuel). 1953. “Sociological Aspects of the Relation between Language and Philosophy”. Philosophy of Science 201.85–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gipper, Helmut. 1972. Gibt es ein sprachliches Relativitätsprinzip? Untersuchungen zur Sapir-Whorf-Hypothese. Frankfurt/M.: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
Hook, Sidney, Hrg. 1969. Language and Philosophy: A symposium. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Humboldt, (Friedrich) Wilhelm (Christian Karl Ferdinand, Freiherr) von (1767–1835). 1963 [1820–35]. Werke hgg. von Andreas Flitner und Klaus Giel, Bd. 31: Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftl. Buchgesellschaft; Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta; Berlin: Rütten & Loening. (4. Aufl., 1972).Google Scholar
Koerner, E(rnst) F(rideryk) K(onrad). 1974. “The Humboldtian Trend in Linguistics”. Papier zum 9. Linguistischen Kolloquium. Bielefeld, 27.-30. August 1974.Google Scholar
Kutschera, Franz von. 1971. Sprachphilosophie. München: W. Fink. (2nd rev. ed., 1974.)Google Scholar
Lee, D(orothy) Demetracopoulou. 1938. “Conceptual Implications of an Indian Language”. Philosophy of Science 5:1.89–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacCoby, Eleanor E., et al., Hrgg. 1958. Readings in Social Psychology. 3. Aufl. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Miller, Robert L(ee). 1968. The Linguistic Relativity Principle and Humboldtian Ethnolinguistics. Den Haag: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penn, Julia Myrle. 1966. Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas: The origins of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in German thought of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Diss., Austin, Tex.: Univ. of Texas. Masch.-Schr., v + 79 S.Google Scholar
Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio. 1973. Ideologies of Linguistic Relativity. Den Haag: Mouton.Google Scholar
Slagle, Uhlan V(on). 1974. “The Kantian Influence on Humboldt’s Linguistic Thought”. HL 1:3.341–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar