A review of the dissemination of information among linguists and the epis-temological basis of the transformational movement leads to the suggestion that the decade from the early 1960’s to the early 1970’s was a decade of private knowledge for persons engaged in the theoretical study of human languages. This decade of private knowledge was not caused directly by Chomsky’s disavowal of empiricism and his espousal of rationalism. Rather, it was caused indirectly by the shift from empiricism to rationalism and the subsequent attempt to base the data for theory building on native speaker intuition. The period of private knowledge in linguistics will probably continue until there is a shift in the epistemological basis of transformational thought.
Allen, Harold B., and Russell N. Campbell. 1972. “Theories and Approaches: Overview”. Teaching English as a Second Language ed. by H. B. Allen and R. N. Campbell, 1–3. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Botha, Rudolf P. (with the collaboration of Walter K. Winckler). 1973. The Justification of Linguistic Hypotheses: A study of nondemonstrative inference in transformational grammar. The Hague: Mouton.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. “The Theorist and the Language Teacher”. Foreign Language Annals 21.30–41.
Carterette, Edward C.1965. Review of Handbook of Mathematical Psychology by R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 1963). Psychometrika 301.207–33.
Chafe, Wallace L.1971. Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970, 184–221. (Repr. in Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar by Noam Chomsky, 11–61. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.)
Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Language and Mind. 2nd enl. ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (1st ed., 1968.)
Crothers, Edward, and Patrick C. Suppes. 1967. Experiments in Second-Language Learning. New York: Academic Press.
Edgley, R(oy). 1970. “Innate Ideas”. Knowledge and Necessity ed. by G. N. A. Vesey, 1–33. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1971. “An Overview of Theories of Grammatical Development”. The Ontogenesis of Grammar ęd. by Dan I. Slobin, 189–212. New York: Academic Press.
Fillenbaum, Samuel. 1971. “Psycholinguists”. Annual Review of Psychology 221.167–208.
Fillmore, Charles J.1969. “Types of Lexical Information”. Studies in Syntax and Semantics ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, 109–37. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Fillmore, Charles J.. 1971. “Verbs of Judging: An exercise in semantic description”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.273–89.
Fillmore, Charles J., and D. Terence Langendoen, eds. 1971. Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Fraser, Bruce. 1970. “Some Remarks on the Action Nominalization in English”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.83–98.
Fraser, Bruce. 1971. “An Analysis of even in English”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.151–80.
Gleitman, Lila R.1965. “Coordinating Conjunctions in English”. Lg 411.260–93.
Hale, Austin. 1970. “Conditions on English Comparative Clause Pairings”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.30–35.
Hill, Archibald A., ed., 1962. Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
Jacobs, Roderick A., and Peter S. Rosenbaum, eds. 1970. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Co.
Kelly, Louis G.1969. 25 Centuries of Language Teaching. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1968. “English Relativization and Certain Related Problems”. Lg 441.244–66. *
Lakoff, George. 1970. “Pronominalization, Negation, and the Analysis of Adverbs”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.146–65.
Lakoff, Robin. 1969. “Transformational Grammar and Language Teaching”. LL 191.117–40.
Lakoff, Robin1971. “If’s, and’s and but’s about Conjunction”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.115–50.
Lamb, Sydney M.1967. Review of Current Issues in Linguistic Theory by Noam Chomsky (The Hague: Mouton, 1964), and Chomsky 1965. AmA 691. 411–15.
Langacker, Ronald W.1969. “On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command”. Modern Studies in English ed. by David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane, 160–86. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
McCawley, James D.1971. “Tense and Time Reference in English”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.97–114.
Nilsen, Don L. F.1972. Toward a Semantic Specification of Deep Case. The Hague: Mouton.
Postal, Paul M.1970. “On the So-called Pronouns in English”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.56–82.
Postal, Paul M.. 1971. “On the Surface Verb remind”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.181–272.
Ross, John R.1970. “On Declarative Sentences”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.222–72.
Sledd, James. 1964. Review of A Linguistic Introduction to the History of English by Morton W. Bloomfield and Leonard Newmark (New York: A. A. Knopf, 1963). Lg 401.465–83.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
ATA, HIROSHI NAG
2001. JUDGMENTS OF GRAMMATICALITY OF JAPANESE BITRANSITIVE SENTENCES WITH A DIFFERING NUMBER OF ARGUMENTS. Perceptual and Motor Skills 92:3 ► pp. 993 ff.
Nagata, Hiroshi
1992. Anchoring Effects in Judging Grammaticality of Sentences. Perceptual and Motor Skills 75:1 ► pp. 159 ff.
Nagata, Hiroshi
2001. Judgments of Grammaticality of Japanese Bitransitive Sentences with a Differing Number of Arguments. Perceptual and Motor Skills 92:3_suppl ► pp. 993 ff.
Cowart, Wayne
1994. Anchoring and Grammar Effects in Judgments of Sentence Acceptability. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79:3 ► pp. 1171 ff.
Lightfoot, David W.
1985. Grammatical theory: its limits and its possibilites. Journal of Pragmatics 9:6 ► pp. 851 ff.
Ney, James W.
1984. Argumentation from evidence in the works of N. Chomsky. <i>WORD</i> 35:3 ► pp. 219 ff.
Ney, James W.
1989. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Language Sciences 11:4 ► pp. 409 ff.
Botha, Rudolf P.
1980. Methodological bases of a progressive mentalism. Synthese 44:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.