Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 2:2 (1975) ► pp. 143156
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

ATA, HIROSHI NAG
2001. JUDGMENTS OF GRAMMATICALITY OF JAPANESE BITRANSITIVE SENTENCES WITH A DIFFERING NUMBER OF ARGUMENTS. Perceptual and Motor Skills 92:3  pp. 993 ff. Crossref logo
Botha, Rudolf P.
1980. Methodological bases of a progressive mentalism. Synthese 44:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Cowart, Wayne
1994. Anchoring and Grammar Effects in Judgments of Sentence Acceptability. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79:3  pp. 1171 ff. Crossref logo
Lightfoot, David W.
1985. Grammatical theory: its limits and its possibilites. Journal of Pragmatics 9:6  pp. 851 ff. Crossref logo
Nagata, Hiroshi
1992. Anchoring Effects in Judging Grammaticality of Sentences. Perceptual and Motor Skills 75:1  pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo
Nagata, Hiroshi
2001. Judgments of Grammaticality of Japanese Bitransitive Sentences with a Differing Number of Arguments. Perceptual and Motor Skills 92:3_suppl  pp. 993 ff. Crossref logo
Ney, James W.
1984. Argumentation from evidence in the works of N. Chomsky. <i>WORD</i> 35:3  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Ney, James W.
1989. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Language Sciences 11:4  pp. 409 ff. Crossref logo
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
1976. The Semantic Theory of James Harris. Historiographia Linguistica 3:3  pp. 275 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Allen, Harold B., and Russell N. Campbell
1972 “Theories and Approaches: Overview”. Teaching English as a Second Language ed. by H. B. Allen and R. N. Campbell, 1–3. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolf P.
(with the collaboration of Walter K. Winckler) 1973The Justification of Linguistic Hypotheses: A study of nondemonstrative inference in transformational grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1968 “The Theorist and the Language Teacher”. Foreign Language Annals 2.30–41.Google Scholar
Carterette, Edward C.
1965Review of Handbook of Mathematical Psychology by R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (New York: J. Wiley & Sons 1963) Psychometrika 30.207–33.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1971Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1970 “Remarks on Nominalization”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970, 184–221. (Repr. in Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar by Noam Chomsky, 11–61. The Hague: Mouton 1972.)Google Scholar
1972Language and Mind. 2nd enl. ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (1st ed. 1968.)Google Scholar
Crothers, Edward, and Patrick C. Suppes
1967Experiments in Second-Language Learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Edgley, R(oy)
1970 “Innate Ideas”. Knowledge and Necessity ed. by G. N. A. Vesey, 1–33. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1971 “An Overview of Theories of Grammatical Development”. The Ontogenesis of Grammar ęd. by Dan I. Slobin, 189–212. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fillenbaum, Samuel
1971 “Psycholinguists”. Annual Review of Psychology 22.167–208.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1969 “Types of Lexical Information”. Studies in Syntax and Semantics ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, 109–37. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
1971 “Verbs of Judging: An exercise in semantic description”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.273–89.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., and D. Terence Langendoen
eds. 1971Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1970 “Some Remarks on the Action Nominalization in English”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.83–98.Google Scholar
1971 “An Analysis of even in English”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.151–80.Google Scholar
Gleitman, Lila R.
1965 “Coordinating Conjunctions in English”. Lg 41.260–93.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin
1970 “Conditions on English Comparative Clause Pairings”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.30–35.Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A. ed.
1962Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Roderick A., and Peter S. Rosenbaum
eds. 1970Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Kelly, Louis G.
196925 Centuries of Language Teaching. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1968 “English Relativization and Certain Related Problems”. Lg 44.244–66. *Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1970 “Pronominalization, Negation, and the Analysis of Adverbs”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.146–65.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1969 “Transformational Grammar and Language Teaching”. LL 19.117–40.Google Scholar
1971 “If’s, and’s and but’s about Conjunction”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.115–50.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sydney M.
1967 Review of Current Issues in Linguistic Theory by Noam Chomsky (The Hague: Mouton 1964), and Chomsky 1965 AmA 69. 411–15.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1969 “On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command”. Modern Studies in English ed. by David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane, 160–86. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1971 “Tense and Time Reference in English”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.97–114.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Don L. F.
1972Toward a Semantic Specification of Deep Case. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M.
1970 “On the So-called Pronouns in English”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.56–82.Google Scholar
1971 “On the Surface Verb remind ”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.181–272.Google Scholar
Ross, John R.
1970 “On Declarative Sentences”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.222–72.Google Scholar
Sledd, James
1964 Review of A Linguistic Introduction to the History of English by Morton W. Bloomfield and Leonard Newmark (New York: A. A. Knopf 1963) Lg 40.465–83.Google Scholar