Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 2:2 (1975) ► pp.143156
References (35)
References
Allen, Harold B., and Russell N. Campbell. 1972. “Theories and Approaches: Overview”. Teaching English as a Second Language ed. by H. B. Allen and R. N. Campbell, 1–3. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolf P. (with the collaboration of Walter K. Winckler). 1973. The Justification of Linguistic Hypotheses: A study of nondemonstrative inference in transformational grammar. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. “The Theorist and the Language Teacher”. Foreign Language Annals 21.30–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carterette, Edward C. 1965. Review of Handbook of Mathematical Psychology by R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 1963). Psychometrika 301.207–33.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1971. Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970, 184–221. (Repr. in Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar by Noam Chomsky, 11–61. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.)Google Scholar
. 1972. Language and Mind. 2nd enl. ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (1st ed., 1968.)Google Scholar
Crothers, Edward, and Patrick C. Suppes. 1967. Experiments in Second-Language Learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Edgley, R(oy). 1970. “Innate Ideas”. Knowledge and Necessity ed. by G. N. A. Vesey, 1–33. New York: St. Martin’s Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1971. “An Overview of Theories of Grammatical Development”. The Ontogenesis of Grammar ęd. by Dan I. Slobin, 189–212. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fillenbaum, Samuel. 1971. “Psycholinguists”. Annual Review of Psychology 221.167–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1969. “Types of Lexical Information”. Studies in Syntax and Semantics ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, 109–37. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1971. “Verbs of Judging: An exercise in semantic description”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.273–89.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., and D. Terence Langendoen, eds. 1971. Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1970. “Some Remarks on the Action Nominalization in English”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.83–98.Google Scholar
. 1971. “An Analysis of even in English”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.151–80.Google Scholar
Gleitman, Lila R. 1965. “Coordinating Conjunctions in English”. Lg 411.260–93.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin. 1970. “Conditions on English Comparative Clause Pairings”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.30–35.Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A., ed., 1962. Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Roderick A., and Peter S. Rosenbaum, eds. 1970. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Kelly, Louis G. 1969. 25 Centuries of Language Teaching. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1968. “English Relativization and Certain Related Problems”. Lg 441.244–66. *Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1970. “Pronominalization, Negation, and the Analysis of Adverbs”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.146–65.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1969. “Transformational Grammar and Language Teaching”. LL 191.117–40.Google Scholar
1971. “If’s, and’s and but’s about Conjunction”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.115–50.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sydney M. 1967. Review of Current Issues in Linguistic Theory by Noam Chomsky (The Hague: Mouton, 1964), and Chomsky 1965. AmA 691. 411–15.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1969. “On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command”. Modern Studies in English ed. by David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane, 160–86. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1971. “Tense and Time Reference in English”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.97–114.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Don L. F. 1972. Toward a Semantic Specification of Deep Case. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1970. “On the So-called Pronouns in English”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.56–82.Google Scholar
. 1971. “On the Surface Verb remind ”. In Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.181–272.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1970. “On Declarative Sentences”. In Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.222–72.Google Scholar
Sledd, James. 1964. Review of A Linguistic Introduction to the History of English by Morton W. Bloomfield and Leonard Newmark (New York: A. A. Knopf, 1963). Lg 401.465–83.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

ATA, HIROSHI NAG
2001. JUDGMENTS OF GRAMMATICALITY OF JAPANESE BITRANSITIVE SENTENCES WITH A DIFFERING NUMBER OF ARGUMENTS. Perceptual and Motor Skills 92:3  pp. 993 ff. DOI logo
Nagata, Hiroshi
1992. Anchoring Effects in Judging Grammaticality of Sentences. Perceptual and Motor Skills 75:1  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Nagata, Hiroshi
2001. Judgments of Grammaticality of Japanese Bitransitive Sentences with a Differing Number of Arguments. Perceptual and Motor Skills 92:3_suppl  pp. 993 ff. DOI logo
Cowart, Wayne
1994. Anchoring and Grammar Effects in Judgments of Sentence Acceptability. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79:3  pp. 1171 ff. DOI logo
Lightfoot, David W.
1985. Grammatical theory: its limits and its possibilites. Journal of Pragmatics 9:6  pp. 851 ff. DOI logo
Ney, James W.
1984. Argumentation from evidence in the works of N. Chomsky. <i>WORD</i> 35:3  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Ney, James W.
1989. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Language Sciences 11:4  pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Botha, Rudolf P.
1980. Methodological bases of a progressive mentalism. Synthese 44:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
1976. The Semantic Theory of James Harris. Historiographia Linguistica 3:3  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.