Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 20:2/3 (1993) ► pp.309330
References (46)
References
Abercrombie, David. 1948. “Forgotten Phoneticians”, Transactions of the Philological Society 1948.1–34. (Repr. in Abercrombie 1965:45–75.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1949. “What Is a ‘letter’?”. Lingua 2.54–63. (Repr. in Abercrombie 1965:76–85.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1965. Studies in Phonetics and Linguistics. London: Oxford Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
. 1986. “Hylomorphic Taxonomy and William Holder”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 16.4–7. (Repr. in Fifty Years in Phonetics: Selected papers by D. Abercrombie, 33–36. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press, 1991.)Google Scholar
Allen, W. Sidney. 1953. Phonetics in Ancient India. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Amman, Johann Conrad. 1692. Surdus Loquens. Amsterdam: Wetstein (Transl. into English by Daniel Foot as The Talking Deaf Man, London: T. Howkins, 1694; facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1972.)Google Scholar
. 1700. Dissertatio de Loquela. Amsterdam: J. Wolters. (Transl. into English by Charles Baker as A Dissertation on Speech, London: Sampson Low, Marston, Low & Searle, 1873; facs. repr., Amsterdam: North Holland, 1965.)Google Scholar
Bell, Alexander Melville. 1867. Visible Speech. London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co.Google Scholar
Bulwer, John. 1644. Chirologia. London: T. Harper.Google Scholar
. 1648. Philocophus. London: H. Moseley.Google Scholar
Cooper, Christopher. 1685. Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. London. (Ed. by J. D. Jones, Halle/S.: Max Niemeyer, 1911; facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.)Google Scholar
. 1687. The English Teacher. London: J. Richardson for the author. (Ed. by Bertil Sundby, Lund: Gleerup, 1953; facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1969.)Google Scholar
Cordemoy, Géraud de. 1668. Discours physique de la parole. Paris: Florentin Lambert. (English transl., A Philosophicall Discourse concerning Speech, London: John Martin, 1668; repr. with an introduction by Karl D. Uitti, New York: AMS Press, 1974.)Google Scholar
Daines, Simon. 1640. Orthoepia Anglicana. London. (Ed. by Martin Rösler & Rudolf Brotanek, Halle/S.: Max Niemeyer, 1908; facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1967.)Google Scholar
Dalgarno, George. 1661. Ars Signorum. London: J. Hayes. (Ed by Thomas Maitland, The Works of George Dalgarno of Aberdeen, Edinburgh: T. Constable, 1834; facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.)Google Scholar
. 1680. Didascalocophus; Double Consonants. Oxford: at the Sheldonian. (Ed by Thomas Maitland, The Works of George Dalgarno of Aberdeen, Edinburgh: T. Constable, 1834.)Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert, ed. 1907. Dr. John Jones’s Practical Phonography (1701). Halle/S.: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Elliot, Ralph W. V. 1954. “Isaac Newton as a Phonetician”. Modern Language Review 491.5–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Alexander John. 1869. On Early English Pronunciation. Vol.I1. London.: Asher & Co. for the Philological Society.Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert. 1946. “The English School of Phonetics”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1946. 92–132. (Repr. in Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951 by J. R. Firth, 92–120. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1957.)Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar, ed. 1972. First Grammatical Treatise. 2nd rev. ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1953. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Transl. by Francis J. Whitfield. Baltimore: Waverly Press. (2nd rev. ed., Madison, Wis.: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1961.)Google Scholar
Holder, William. 1668. “An Experiment Concerning Deafness”. Philosophical Transactions.Google Scholar
. 1669. Elements of Speech: An Essay of Inquiry into the Natural Production of Letters: with An Appendix concerning Persons Deaf and Dumb. London: T. N. for J. Martyn. (Facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1967. Also repr., with an introd. by Robert W. Rieber & Jeffrey L. Wollock, New York: AMS Press, 1975.)Google Scholar
Hulsker, Jos L. M. 1988. “Petrus Montanus as a Phonetician and a Theoretician”. HL 9:3.335–359. (Repr. in The History of Linguistics in the Low Countries ed. by Jan Noordegraaf, Kees Versteegh & Konrad Koerner, 85–108. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1992.)Google Scholar
Hume, Alexander. 1617. Of the Orthographic and Congruitie of the Britan Tongue. (Ed. from the original ms. in the British Museum by Henry B. Wheatley, London: Early English Text Society, 1865.)Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1889. The Articulations of Speech Sounds. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Jones, John. 1701. Practical Phonography. London: Richard Smith. [See Ekwall 1907.]Google Scholar
Kemp, J. Alan. 1972. John Wallis’s Grammar of the English Language. With translation and commentary. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1967. “The Nature of Vowel Quality”. Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics by P. Ladefoged, 50–142. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Montanus, Petrus. 1635. De Spreeckonst. Delft: Jan Pietersz Waalpot. (Ed. by Willem J. H. Caron, Groningen: L.J.B. Wolters, 1964.)Google Scholar
Robinson, Robert. 1617. The Art of Pronuntiation. London: Nicholas Okes. (Ed. by Eric John Dobson, The Phonetic Writings of Robert Robinson, London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1957.)Google Scholar
Salmon, Vivian. 1972. The Works of Francis Lodwick. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1988[1979]. The Study of Language in 17th-Century England. 2nd ed. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara J. 1969. John Wilkins: 1614–1672. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R. Scott & Douglas Guthrie. 1949. A History of Oto-laryngology. Edinburgh: Livingstone.Google Scholar
Subbiondo, Joseph L. 1978. “William Holder’s Elements of Speech (1669): A study of applied English phonetics and speech therapy”. Lingua 461:169–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. “John Wilkins’ Theory of Articulatory Phonetics”. Papers in the History of Linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS III), Princeton, 19–23 August 1984 ed. by Hans Aarsleff, Louis G. Kelly & Hans-Josef Niederehe, 263–270. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ed. 1992. John Wilkins and 17th-Century British Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1908. The Sounds of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vos, Andries A. 1962. Tradition and Innovation in Petrus Montanus, The Art of Speech, 1635. Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh Univ.Google Scholar
Walker, John. 1791. A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language. London: G.G.J. and J. Robinson and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Wallis, John. 1653. Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. Oxford: L. Lichfield. (Facs. repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1969; see also Kemp 1972.)Google Scholar
. 1678. A Defence of the Royal Society. London: T. S. for Thomas Moore.Google Scholar
Wilkins, John. 1668. An Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: for Sa. Gellibrand, and for John Martyn. (Facs. repr. Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.)Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry Cecil. 1953. A History of Modern Colloquial English. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Isermann, Michael M
2011. Conceptual History Coming Home. Language & History 54:1  pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Isermann, Michael M.
2007. Letters, sounds and things. Historiographia Linguistica 34:2-3  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Kemp, J.A.
1995. Phonetics: Precursors to Modern Approaches. In Concise History of the Language Sciences,  pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1993. Historiography of Phonetics: the State of the Art. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 23:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.