Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 20:2/3 (1993) ► pp.399440

*Where relevant, the composition date, in brackets, follows the publication date.

Anderson, Stephen R.
1976 [1966] “Concerning the Notion ‘Base Component of a Transformational Grammar’”. McCawley 1976a 113–128. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985Phonology in the Twentieth Century. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon
1967 “ Have and Be in English”. Language 431.462–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1968[1967] “Nouns and Noun Phrases”. Bach & Harms 1968.91–124.Google Scholar
1977 “Comments on the Paper by Chomsky”. Culicover et al. 1977.133–155.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon & Robert T. Harms
eds. 1968Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bain, Alexander
1879Logic. 21 vols. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
1954 “Logical Syntax and Semantics”. Language 301. 230–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beach, Woodford A.
, et al. eds. 1977Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas G. & Peter S[tephen] Rosenbaum
1970 “Some Lexical Structures and Their Empirical Validity”. Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.3–19.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred & Karl Erich Heidolph
eds. 1970Progress in Linguistics: A collection of papers. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L[eMerton]
1991[1974, 1988] “First Person, not Singular”. Koerner 1991.19–46.Google Scholar
Booles, George N. D.
[1854] An Investigation of the Laws of Thought. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Brame, Michael K.
1976Conjectures and Refutations in Syntax and Semantics. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Brekle, Herbert Ernst
1969 “Generative Semantics vs. Deep Syntax”. Kiefer 1969.80–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1970[1968]Generative Satzsemantik und transformationeile Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
1978Generative Satzsemantik im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. München: Wilhelm Fink. [= 2nd ed. of Brekle 1970.]Google Scholar
Carden, Guy
1968a “A Note on None ”. Aiken Computation Laboratory Technical Report NSF-20-X:1-3. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ.Google Scholar
1968b “English Quantifiers”. Aiken Computation Laboratory Technical Report NSF-20-IX:1-45. Ibid.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf
1937[1934]The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1967a “Language as Symbolization”. Language 431.57–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967b Review of Katz (1966) IJAL 331.248–254.Google Scholar
1970aMeaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1970bA Semantically Based Sketch of Onondaga. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chomsky, [Avram] Noam
1957aSyntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton & Co.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1957b “Logical Structures in Language”. American Documentation 81.284–291. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1964a[1962] “The Logical Basis of Linguistic Theory”. Lunt 1964 914–977.Google Scholar
1964b[1963]Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1965[1964]Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1966Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
1968Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
1972aLanguage and Mind. Enlarged ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
1972bStudies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, The Hague: Mouton. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975[1955–1956; preface dated 1973] The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
1979[1976]Language and Responsibility. Transl. by John Viertel. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1982 [1979–80]The Generative Enterprise: A discussion with Riny Huybregts and Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1991[1989] “Linguistics and Adjacent Fields: A personal view”. Kasher 1991.3–25.Google Scholar
Corum, Claudia
, et al. eds. 1973Papers from the Ninth Regional Chicago Linguistic Society Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian
eds. 1977Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dinneen, Francis P., S.J.
ed. 1966Report of the 17th Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies [GURT 1966]. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Ray C.
1970 “Recent Studies on Language Universals”. Foundations of Language 61.505–561.Google Scholar
1974 “Generative Semantic Methods: A Bloomfieldian conter-revolution”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 31.255–286.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1979Word Meaning in Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elgin, Suzette Haden
1973What is Linguistics? Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J[ohn]
1966 “A Proposal Concerning English Prepositions”. Dinneen 1966.208–231.Google Scholar
1968[1967] “The Case for Case”. Bach & Harms 1968.1–90.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J[ohn], & D. Terrence Langendoen
eds. 1971Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A[lvin], & Jerrold J[acob] Katz
eds. 1964The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fought, John
1982 Review of Newmeyer (1980a) Language in Society 111. 317–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frantz, Donald [Gene]
1974Generative Semantics: An introduction. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Linguistic Club.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Osamu
ed. 1973Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory. Tokyo: Tokyo Institute for Advanced Studies of Language.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald
1982 Reviews of Brame (1978, 1979) Journal of Linguistics 181.464–473. DOI logo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John
1989 Review of van Riemsdijk & Williams (1987) Language 651.150–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Georgia
1974[1972]Semantics and Syntactic Irregularity. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H[arold]
ed. 1963Universals of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (2nd ed.1966.)Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey S[teven]
1976[1965, 1967]Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics . New York: North-Holland. [Original titles: “Studies in lexical relations” and “Functions of the lexicon in formal descriptive grammars”.]Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A. Jr.
1987Linguistics and Pseudo-Linguistics: Selected essays, 1965–1985. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Randy Allen
1990The Life and Death of Generative Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. The Linguistics Wars: Chomsky, generative semantics, and the rhetoric of science. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Harris, Zellig S[abbettai]
1954 “Distributional Structure”. Word 101.140–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1968The Mathematical Structures of Language. Dordrecht/Holland: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Hayes, Curtis W., Jacob Ornstein & William W. Gage
1977ABCs of Languages and Linguistics: A practical primer to language sciences in today’s world. The new, revised, and expanded ed. Silver Spring, Md.: The Institute of Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A[nderson]
Householder, Fred W[alter], Jr.
1970 “Reviewer’s Reply [to Robin Tolmach Lakoff]”. Language Sciences No. 10.35–36.Google Scholar
Huck, Geoffrey J. & John Goldsmith
Forthcoming. The Deep Structure Debates.
Jackendoff, Ray S.
1972Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Roderick A. & Peter S[tephen] Rosenbaum
eds. 1970Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin
ed. 1957Readings in Linguistics: The development of descriptive linguistics in America since 1925. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Kasher, Asa
ed. 1991The Chomskyan Turn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J[acob]
1966The Philosophy of Language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J[acob], & Jerry A. Fodor
1964[1963] “The Structure of a Semantic Theory”. Fodor & Katz 1964.479–518.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J[acob], & Paul M[artin]. Postal
1964An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Martin
1970[1967] “From Semantics to Syntax”. Bierwisch & Heidolph 1970.114–126.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc
ed. 1969Studies in Syntax and Semantics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimball, John [Price]
1973The Formal Theory of Grammar. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, [René] Paul [Viktor]
1973[1970] “How Abstract is Phonology?”. Fujimura 1973.5–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, [René] Paul [Viktor] & Carol Kiparsky
1970[1967] “Fact”. Bierwisch & Heidolph 1970 143–173.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
ed. 1991First Person Singular II: Autobiographies by North American Scholars in the language sciences (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 61.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, Koenraad
1975 “Discussion of Ray C. Dougherty’s ‘Generative Semantics Methods: A Bloomfieldian counterrevolution’”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 41.159–161.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1968[1966]Deep and Surface Grammar. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
1970 [1965; degree awarded 1966] Irregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [Original (dissertation) title: “On the nature of syntactic irregularity”.]Google Scholar
1971 [1969] “On Generative Semantics”. Steinberg & Jakobovits 1971.232–296.Google Scholar
1973 “Fuzzy Grammar and the Performance/Competence Terminology Game”. Corum et al. 1973.271–291.Google Scholar
1976[1963] “Toward Generative Semantics”. McCawley 1976a.43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977 “Linguistic Gestalts”. Beach et al. 1977.236–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988a[1974] “Syntactic Amalgams”. Schiller et al. 1988.25–45.Google Scholar
1988b “Postscript”. Schiller et al. 1988.44–45.Google Scholar
1989 “Philosophical Speculation and Cognitive Science”. Philosophical Psychology 21.55–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & John Robert [Háj] Ross
1976[1967] “Is Deep Structure Necessary?McCawley 1976a.159–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin [Tolmach]
1968Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation. (= Research monograph, 49.) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1969 Review of Grammaire genérale et raisonnée (Lancelot & Arnauld 1966[1676]) Language 451.343–364.Google Scholar
1972 “The Pragmatics of Modality”. Peranteau et al. 1972.229–246.Google Scholar
1974 “Pluralism in Linguistics”. Berkeley Studies in Syntax and Semantics 11:XIV-1–XIV-36.Google Scholar
1989 “The Way We Were; or, the Real Actual Truth about Generative Semantics: A memoir”. Journal of Pragmatics 131.939–988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lancelot of Benwick [= Robert I. Binnick], Morgan le Fay [= Jerry L. Morgan] & The Green Knight [= Georgia Green
] 1976[1968] “Camelot, 1968”. McCawley 1976a.249–274.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B.
1968[1960; with prefaces dated 1962, 1964, and 1965] The Grammar of English Nominalizations. 5th printing. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1970a[1967] “On Very Deep Grammatical Structure”. Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.134–144.Google Scholar
1970b[1967] “Problems in the Grammatical Analysis of English Nominal Compounds”. Bierwisch & Heidolph 1970.174–186.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B. & Edward S. Klima
1963 “Rules for English Pronominalization”. Language 391.17–28. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1972Descriptive Linguistics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Liefrink, Frans
1973Semantico-Syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lunt, Horace G.
ed. 1964The Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
ed. 1970aNew Horizons in Linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
ed. 1970b “Generative Syntax”. Lyons 1970a:130–151.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Graham
1981 Review of Newmeyer (1980a) Lingua 531.371–380. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathews, G. Hubert
1965Hidatsa Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D[avid]
1968[1965]The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
ed. 1976aNotes from the Linguistic Underground. (= Syntax and Semantics, 7.) New York: Academic Press. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976bGrammar and Meaning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1980b Review of Newmeyer (1980a) Linguistics 181.911–930.Google Scholar
1980b Letter [reply to Newmeyer 1980b] Linguistics 181.1099–1104.Google Scholar
1980c “An Un-Syntax”. Moravscik & Wirth 1980.167–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1982Thirty Million Theories of Grammar. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
In press. “Generative Semantics”. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford & New York: Pergamon.
Moravcsik, Edith A. & Jessica R. Wirth
eds. 1980Current Approaches to Syntax. (= Syntax and Semantics, 13.) New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntz, Jim
1972 “Reflections of the Development of Transformational Theories”. Plötz 1972.251–274.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1981 Review of Newmeyer (1980a) HL 8.1.107–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo
1981 Review of Newmeyer (1980a) Language 571.456–459. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J[aret]
1980aLinguistic Theory in America: The First Quarter-century of Transformational Generative Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1980b “A Reply to James McCawley’s Review of Linguistic Theory in America [= Newmeyer 1980a]”. Linguistics 181.931–937.Google Scholar
1986Linguistic Theory in America. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1988 “Bloomfield, Jakobson, Chomsky, and the Roots of Generative Grammar”. Manuscript of a paper delivered at The First Annual Meeting of the North American Association for the History of the Language Sciences (NAAHoLS), New Orleans, La., Dec. 1988.
1989 Review of Schiller et al. (1988) Language 651.392–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 “Rules and Principles in the Historical Development of Generative Syntax”. Kasher 1991.200–230.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A.
1975Componential Analysis of Meaning. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, W. R.
1974 “On Generative Gymnastics”. Archivum Linguisticum n.s. 5.53–82.Google Scholar
Palermo, David, & Walter Weimar
eds. 1974Cognition and the Symbolic Processes. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Parret, Herman
ed. 1974[1972]Discussing Language. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peranteau, Paul M.
et al. eds. 1972Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Peters, Stanley
ed. 1972Goals of Linguistic Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Plötz, Senta
ed. 1972Transformational Analysis: The transformational theory of Zellig Harris and its development. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M[artin]
1964 “Underlying and Superficial Structure”. Harvard Educational Review 341.246–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1966 “On So-Called ‘Pronouns’ of English”. Dinneen 1966.177–206.Google Scholar
1971[1969] “On the Surface Verb Remind ”. Fillmore & Langendoen 1971.180–270.Google Scholar
1972[1969] “The Best Theory”. Peters 1972.131–170.Google Scholar
1988 “Topic … Comment: Advances in linguistic rhetoric”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 61.129–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert [“Háj”]
1969[1967] “Auxiliaries as Main Verbs”. Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 11.77–102.Google Scholar
1970a[1967] “Gapping and the Order of Constituents”. Bierwisch & Heidolph 1970.249–259.Google Scholar
1970b[1968] “On Declarative Sentences”. Jacobs & Rosenbaum 1970.222–272.Google Scholar
1973[1970] “Nouniness”. Fujimura 1973.137–257.Google Scholar
1974 “Three Batons for Cognitive Psychology”. Palermo & Weimar 1974.63–124.Google Scholar
1986[1967]Infinite Syntax! Norwood: ABLEX Publishing. [Original (dissertation) title: “Constraints on Variables in Syntax”.]Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas
1991 [1982–89]Syntax and Human Experience. Ed. and transl. by John Goldsmith. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
1975The Form of Language. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1949[1921]Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1962 Review of Lees (1960) IJAL 281.134–146.Google Scholar
Schiller, Eric, Barbara Need, Douglas Varley & William H. Eilfort
1988The Best of CLS: A selection of out-of-print papers from 1968 to 1975. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A. M.
ed. 1974Semantic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajicová & Eva Benecová
1973Topic, Focus, and Generative Semantics. Kronberg/Taunus: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. M. Y.
1979A First Course in Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sinha, Anil C.
1977 “Some Issues in Semantics”. Semiotica 201.271–356. [Review of Seuren 1974.] DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Danny D. & Leon A. Jakobovits
eds. 1971Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tolmach Lakoff
see Lakoff, Robin [Tolmach].
Vater, Heinz
1971 “Linguistics in West Germany”. Language Sciences No. 16.6–24.Google Scholar
Vroman, William Viera
1976Predicate Raising and the Syntax-Morphology-Semantics Cycle: Latin and Portuguese. Unpub. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Wardaugh, Ronald
1977Introduction to Linguistics. 2nd ed. New York: MacGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
1976 “McCawley on Generative Semantics”. Linguistic Analysis 21.279–301.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1967[1964]Explorations in Semantic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1972Semantic Primitives. Frankfurt/Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar
1976 [1967] “Mind and Body”. McCawley 1976a.129–158. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M., Peter H. Salus, Robert I. Binnick & Anthony L. Vanek
eds. 1970Studies out in Left Field: Defamatory Essays Presented to James D. McCawley. (= Current Inquiry into Language and Linguistics, 4.) Edmonton: Linguistic Research. (Repr, with a new foreword by Regna Darnell, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1992.)Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Joseph, John E.
1995. The Structure of linguistic revolutions. Historiographia Linguistica 22:3  pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Kertész, András
2010. From ‘scientific revolution’ to ‘unscientific revolution’: an analysis of approaches to the history of generative linguistics. Language Sciences 32:5  pp. 507 ff. DOI logo
Koerner, E.F. Konrad
1995. [no title] - Randy Allen Harris. The Linguistics Wars. New York: Oxford University Press. 1993. Pp. xii + 356. US$42.00 (hardcover).. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 40:2  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Nevin, Bruce E.
1993. A minimalist program for linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 20:2-3  pp. 355 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.