Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 20:2/3 (1993) ► pp.341454
Abbott, Barbara
1986Review of The Vastness of Natural Languages ed. by D. Terence Langendoen & Paul M. Postal (Oxford: Blackwell 1984) Language 621.154–157.Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard
1948 “A Set of Postulates for Phonemic Analysis”. Language 241.3–46. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
A Set of Postulates for the Science of Language”. Language 21.153–164. DOI logo DOI logo
Botha, Rudolph P.
1988Challenging Chomsky: The generative garden game. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Broderick, John P.
1975Modern English Linguistics: A structural and transformational grammar. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Cattell, N. R.
1972The New English Grammar: A descriptive introduction. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1962[1958] “A Transformational Approach to Syntax”. Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English ed. by Archibald A. Hill, 124–186. Austin, Texas: Univ. of Texas.Google Scholar
1959Review of Joseph H. Greenberg, Essays in Linguistics (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press 1957) Word 151.202–218.Google Scholar
1961 “Some Methodological Remarks on Generative Grammar”. Word 171.219–239. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1963 “Introduction to the Formal Analysis of Natural Languages”. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology ed. by R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush & Eugene Galanter, vol.II1, 269–321. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1964Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1966Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1975aThe Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum Press. [Revised and abridged version of a 1955–56 typescript.]Google Scholar
1975bReflections on Language. New York. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
1981aLectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
1981b “Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory”. Explanation in Linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition ed. by Norbert Hornstein & David Lightfoot, 32–76. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1982aSome Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1982b “On the Representation of Form and Function”. Perspective on Mental Representation: Experimental and theoretical studies of cognitive processes and capacities ed. by Jacques Mehler, Edward T. C. Walker & Merrill Garrett, 3–38. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of Language: Its nature origin and use. New York: Praeger Scientific.Google Scholar
1987 “Language in a Psychological Setting”. Working Papers in Linguistics, Number 221. Tokyo: Sophia University.Google Scholar
1990 “Topic … Comment: On formalization and formal linguistics”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 71.137–143.Google Scholar
1991 “Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation”. Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar ed. by Robert Freidin, 417–454. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1992A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. (= MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 1.) Cambridge, Mass.: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar
Fiengo, Robert
1977 “On Trace Theory”. Linguistic Inquiry 81.35–61.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1970 “On Generativity”. Ohio State University: Working Papers in Linguistics, No.61. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State Univ.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. & Zenon W. Pylyshyn
1988 “Connectionist and Cognitive Architecture: A critical analysis”. Cognition 291.3–71. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Austin
1976 “The Relationship of Tagmemic Theory to Rules, Derivation, and Transformational Grammar”. Tagmemics, Volume 21: Theoretical discussion ed. by Ruth M. Brend & Kenneth L. Pike (= Trends in Linguistics; Studies and Monographs, 2), 51–90. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1951Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1954 “Transfer Grammar”. IJAL 201.259–270.Google Scholar
Hartmann, R. R. K. & F. C. Stork
1972Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1954 “Two Models of Grammatical Description”. Word 101.210–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell & John Fought
1981American Structuralism. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J.
1966The Philosophy of Language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Thomas G. Bever
1976 “The Fall and Rise of Empiricism”. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability ed. by Thomas G. Bever, Jerrold J. Katz & D. Terence Langendoen, 11–64. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal
1991 “Realism vs. Conceptualism in Linguistics”. Linguistics and Philosophy 141.515–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1978Toward a Historiography of Linguistics. Foreword by R. H. Robins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [See especially pp.203–213.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983 “The Chomskyan ‘Revolution’ and Its Historiography: A few critical remarks”. Language and Communication 31.147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 “The Chomskyan ‘Revolution’ and its Historiography: Observations of a bystander”. Practicing Linguistic Historiography: Selected essays by Konrad Koerner, 101–146. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [A significantly expanded version of Koerner (1983).] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad. & Matsuji Tajima
1986Noam Chomsky: A personal bibliography, 1951–1986. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1988 “A Usage Based Model”. Topics in Cognitive Linguistics ed. by Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, 128–161. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990Concept, Image, and Symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPointe, Steven
1986Review of D. Terence Langendoen & Paul M. Postal, The Vastness of Natural Language (Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1984) Linguistics and Philosophy 91.225–243.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B.
1957Review of Chomsky (1957). Language 331.375–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1958 “Some Neglected Aspects of Parsing”. Readings in Applied Linguistics ed. by Harold B. Allen, 146–155. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1976Descriptive Linguistics: An introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Leiber, Justin
1975Noam Chomsky. Boston: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Malmstrom, Jean & Constance Weaver
1973Transgrammar: English structure, style, and dialects. 2nd ed. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman & Co.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Mike
1983 “The Generative Revolution and the Summer Institute of Linguistics”. Notes on Linguistics 281.13–16.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1985Review of Newmeyer (1983). Language 611.668–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988Review of Chomsky (1986). Language 641.355–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, J[im]
1975 “The Parasitic Growth of Deep Structures”. Foundations of Language 131.361–389.Google Scholar
Moore, Terence & Christine Carling
1987 “Introduction”. Noam Chomsky: Consensus and controversy ed. by Sohan Modgil & Celia Modgil, 11–28. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1983Grammatical Theory: Its limits and possibilities. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
1989 2nd ed. Prepared by J. A. Simpson & E. S. C. Weiner. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pei, Mario Andrew
1966Glossary of Linguistic Terminology. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 201.365–424.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey
1977 “Word Order Universals and Grammatical Relations”. Syntax and Semantics, Vol.81: Grammatical Relations ed. by Peter Cole & Jerrold M. Saddock, 252–279. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 “Topic … Comment: Formal linguistics meets the Boojum”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 71.137–143.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1985 “Variable Rules, O.K.? Or can there be sociolinguistic grammars?”. Language and Society 51.53–67.Google Scholar
Salkie, Raphael
1990The Chomsky Update: Linguistics and politics. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
1979 “What Was Transformational Grammar? A Review of Chomsky, The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory [1975a]”. Lingua 481.355–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar