Review article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 20:2/3 (1993) ► pp.455472
References
Alaverdov, Konstantin A.
1931 “Praktika jafetidologov i sovremennost’ [Japhetidological praxis and contemporaneity]”. Revoljucija i jazyk 11.50–55.Google Scholar
Alpatov, Vladimir M.
1991Istorija odnogo mifa: Marr i marrizm [The history of a myth]. Moskva: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1985Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of rules and theories of representation. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aptekar, Valerian B.
1934Marr i novoe učenie o jazyke [Marr and the New Theory of language]. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe social’no-ekonomičeskoe izdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
[Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan] Boduèn de Kurtenè, I. A.
1963[1884] “Obozrenie slavjanskogo jazykovogo mira [An overview of the Slavic linguistic world]”. Izbrannye trudy, 127–138.Google Scholar
1963 [1904] “Jazyk i jazyki [Language and languages]”. Izbrannye trudy, 67–95.Google Scholar
1963 [1910] “Fonetičeskie zakony [Phonetic laws]”. Izbrannye trudy, 189–208.Google Scholar
1963Izbrannye trudy po obščemu jazykoznaniju [Selected works on general linguistics]. Ed. by Sergej G. Barxudarov et al. 21 vols. Moskva: Izd. Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Belevickij, Sergej L.
1931 “O čem šel spor [What the dispute is about]”. Revoljucija i jazyk 11.11–20.Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony
1979Formalism and Marxism. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogdanov, Aleksandr A.
1925[1913]Nauka i proletariat [Science and the proletariat]”. O proletarskoj kulture [About proletarian culture], 219–229. Leningrad: Kniga.Google Scholar
Bruche-Schulz, Gisela
1984Russische Sprachwissenschaft: Wissenschaft im historisch-politischen Prozess des vorsowjetischen und sowjetischen Ruß-land. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cseresnyési, László
1992Review article on Language Typology 1987: Papers from the Linguistic Typology Symposium, Berkeley 1–3 December 1987 ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1990) Language Sciences 14:1/2.155–168.Google Scholar
Danilov, Georgij K.
1931 “Jafetidologija v nasi dni [Japhetitology on our days”. Revoljucija i jazyk. 11. 21–27.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile
1973[1895], Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Glück, Helmut
1986 “Die Speisekarte der Sprachenfresser: Zur Aktualität von Jan Baudouin de Courtenay (1845–1929) für die sprachensoziologische Forschung”. Germanistische Mitteilungen 231.3–25.Google Scholar
Gruppa Jazykfront [The language front group]” 1931Revoljucija i jazyk 11. 77–78.Google Scholar
Gray, Piers
1993 “Totalitarian Logic: Stalin on linguisticsCritical Quarterly 11.16–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Great Soviet Encyclopedia
1973 New York: Macmillan. [Transl. of Bol’ šaja Sovetskaja Ènciklopedija, Moscow 1970.]Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1972 “Editorial”. Language in Society 11.1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leont’ev, Aleksej A., L. J. Rojzenzon & A. D. Xajutin
1974[1968] “The Life and Activities of E. D. Polivanov [Zizn i dejatel’nost’ E. D. Polivanova]”. Selected Works: Articles on general linguistics, 11–31. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Marr, Nikolaj J.
1933[1920] “Jafetičeskij kavkaz i tretij etničeskij element v sozidanii sredizemnomorskoj kul’tury [The Japhetic Caucasus and the third ethnic element in the creation of Mediterranean culture]”. Izbrannye raboty I1, 79–124.Google Scholar
1933Ètapy razvitija jafetičeskoj teorii [The stages of the development of the Japhetic theory]”, Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Vol.I1, ed. by Valerian B. Aptekar’. Moskva: Izd. Akademii Nauk SSSR. Gos. akademia istorii material’noj kul’tury im. N. Ja. Marra.Google Scholar
1934[1926] “Linguističeski namečaemye èpoxi razvitija čelovečestva i ix uvjazka s istoriej material’noj kultury [Linguistically marked epochs in the development of mankind and their connection with the history of material culture]”. Izbrannye raboty III1, 35–60.Google Scholar
1934Jazyk i obsčestvo [Language and society]. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Vol.III1, ed. by Levon G. Bašindžagjan, Moskva: Izd. AN SSSR. Gos. ak. istorii material’noj kul’tury.Google Scholar
1936[1926] “O proisxozdenija jazyka [On the origin of language]”. Izbrannye raboty II1, 179–126.Google Scholar
1935Ètno- i glottogonija vostocnoj Evropy [The ethnic and linguistic origin of Eastern Europe]. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Vol.V1, ed. by Valerian B. Aptekar’. Moskva: Izd. AN SSSR. Gos. akademia istorii material’noj kul’tury im. N. Ja. Marra.Google Scholar
1936Osnovnye voprosy jazykoznanija [Fundamental questions in linguistics]. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Vol.II1, ed. by Levon G. Basindžagjan. Ibid.Google Scholar
1937Osnovnye voprosy istorii jazyka [Fundamental questions in the history of language]. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Vol.IV1, ed. by Leon A. Orbeli. Ibid.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl
1969[1845] “Thesen über Feuerbach”. Marx / Engels Werke, vol. III1, 5–7. Berlin: Carl Dietz.Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav
1986 “On the First Russian Prolegomena to Semiotics”. Appendix I to Marxism and the Philosophy of Language by Valentin N. Vološinov, 2nd rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mixailov, Boris
1993 “Reshaping the Public Sphere in the Process of Democratic Transition in Russia”. Seminar talk given at the Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong on 15 January 1993.Google Scholar
Mugdan, Joachim
1984Jan Baudouin de Courte nay (1845–1929): Leben und Werk. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Olmsted, David L.
1985 “Baudouin, Structuralism, and Society”. For Gordon Fairbanks ed. by Veneeta Z. Ascon & Richard L. Leed, 296–304. Honolulu: Univ. of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Katherine H.
1986Language Theories of the Early Soviet Period. Exeter: Univ. of ExeterGoogle Scholar
Polivanov, Evgenij D.
1974[1928a] “Factors in the Phonetic Evolution of Language as a Work Process [Faktory fonetičeskogo èvoljucii jazyka kak trudovogo processa]”. Selected Works, 65–80.Google Scholar
1974[1928b] “Specific features of the last decade 1917–1927 in the history of our linguistic thought (In lieu of a foreword) [Specifičeskie osobennosti poslednego desjati-letija 1917–1927 v istorii našej lingvističeskoj mysli]”. Selected Works, 57–61.Google Scholar
1974[1929] “The Problem of Marxist Linguistics and the Japhetic Theory [Problema marksistskogo jazykoznanija i jafetičeskaja teorija]”. Selected Works, 169–170.Google Scholar
1974[1931a] “The Phonetics of the Language of Intellectuals [Fonetika intelligentskogo jazyka]”. Selected Works, 211–219.Google Scholar
1974[1931b] “Where Do the Reasons for Language Evolution Lie? [Gde ležat principy jazykovoj evoljucii?]”. Selected Works, 81–92.Google Scholar
1974[1968]Selected Works: Articles on general linguistics [Izbrannye raboty: Stat’i po obščemu jazykoznaniju]. Compiled by Aleksej A. Leont’ev et al. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalin, Josif V.
1950Marksizm i voprosy jazykoznanija [Marxism and the problems in linguistics]. Moskva: Izd. Pravda.Google Scholar
Thomas, Lawrence L.
1957The Linguistic Theories of N. Ja. Marr. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1992 “Dialect Contact, Dialectology and Sociolinguistics”. Sociolinguistics Today ed. by Kingsley Bolton & Helen Kwok, 71–79. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vološinov, Valentin N[ikolaevič]
1986[1929]Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Translated by Ladislav Matejka and I. R. Titunik. 2nd rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Bruche-Schulz, Gisela
2011. The “Geneva School”. Historiographia Linguistica 38:1-2  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Chapter 8. The Baxtin myth and its historiography. In Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 128],  pp. 194 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.