Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 21:1/2 (1994) ► pp. 137
References

References

Allwood, Jens, Lars-Gunnar Andersson & Östen Dahl
1977Logic in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Paul Kent
1989a “Gibt es Passivmorphologie?”. Linguistische Berichte No. 121.185–205.Google Scholar
1989b “Remarks on the Origin of the Term Passive”. Lingua 79.1–16.Google Scholar
1991A New Look at the Passive. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
1992 “Aktive Passivkonstruktionen im Altgriechischen: Ein Beitrag zur Pragmatik”. Ms., Univ. of Bielefeld.Google Scholar
1993 “Eine alternative Sprachtypologie für das Reflexiv”. Folia Linguistica 27.107–146.Google Scholar
In press. “Zur Diathese”. To appear in Historische Sprachforschung.
Bolinger, Dwight
1977Meaning and Form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Collinge, N. E.
1963 “The Greek Use of the Term ‘Middle’ in Linguistic Analysis”. Word 19.232–241.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Bertold
1897Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Zweiter Theil. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Geniušiene, Emma
1987Typology of Reflexive Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
ed. 1985aIconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
ed. 1985bNatural Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hermodsson, Lars
1952Reflexive und intransitive Verba im älteren Westgermanischen. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.Google Scholar
Hilgard, Alfred
ed. 1894Theodosii Alexandrini Canones. Georgii Choerobosci Scholia. Sophronii Patriarchae Alexandrini. (= Grammatici Graeci IV: 1–2) Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
ed. 1901Scholia in Dionysii Thracis Artem Grammaticam. (= Grammatici Graeci 1:2.) Ibid.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even
1987 “Genera verborum quot sunt? Observations on the Roman grammatical tradition”. The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period ed. by Daniel J. Taylor, 133–147. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jankuhn, Harald
1969Die passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache Homers. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, Karl
ed. 1907Simplicii in Aristotelis Categorias Commenat-rium. (= Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, 8.) Berlin: G. Reimer.Google Scholar
Keil, Heinrich
ed. 1855–1880Grammatici Latini. 8 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1961.)Google Scholar
Kemp, Alan
1987 “The Tekhnë Grammatikë of Dionysius Thrax translated into English”. The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period ed. by Daniel J. Taylor, 167–189. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koivisto, Vesa
1989 “Semantics of Karelian Reflexive Verbs”. Proceedings of the Fifth International Finno-Ugrist Students’ Conference, Helsinki, 22–26 May 1988 ed. by Riho Grünthal, Sirpa Penttinen & Tapani Salminen, 51–58. Helsinki: Castrenianum Complex of the Univ. of Helsinki Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1964The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. & Pamela Munro
1975 “Passives and Their Meaning”. Language 51.789–830.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1968Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Neu, Erich
1985 “Das frühindogermanische Diathesensystem. Funktion und Geschichte”. Grammatische Kategorien: Funktion und Geschichte. Akten der VII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Berlin, 20.-25. Februar 1983 ed. by Bernfried Schlerath, 275–295. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1992 “Iconicity and Generative Grammar”. Language 68.756–796.Google Scholar
Polenz, Max
1970Die Stoa: Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung. 4. Auflage. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Robins, R[obert] H.
1993The Byzantine Grammarians: Their place in history. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schauwecker, Ludwig
1960 “Die genera verbi im Französisch/Provenzalis-chen”. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 70.49–83.Google Scholar
Schiefer, Erhard
1983Überlegungen zur Tauglichkeit des Passivbegriffs und bisheriger Passivuntersuchungen, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung finnisch-ugrischer Sprachen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard
1950Griechische Grammatik. Zweiter Band: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. Ed. by Albert Debrunner. München: M. C. Beck.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1985 “Passives and Related Constructions: A prototype analysis”. Language 61.821–848.Google Scholar
Uhlig, Gustav
ed. 1883Dionysii Thracis Ars Grammatica. (= Grammatici Graeci I:1.) Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
ed. 1910Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt. (= Grammatici Graeci II:2.) Ibid.Google Scholar
Xolodovič, A. A.
1970 “Zalog [Voice]”. Kategorija zaloga: Materialy kon-ferencii, 2–26. Leningrad.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Benedetti, Marina
2014. Pourquoi l'appelle-t-on moyen ? Apollonius Dyscole et les « figures moyennes ». Langages 194:2  pp. 9 ff. Crossref logo
Signes-Codoñer, Juan
2005. The definitions of the Greek Middle Voice between Apollonius Dyscolus and Constantinus Lascaris. Historiographia Linguistica 32:1-2  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.