Remarks on Dionysios Thrax’s concept of ‘Diáthesis’
The purpose of this paper is to present a new interpretation of Dionysios Thrax’s original definition of diáthesis. Diáthesis was regarded as one of seven morphological categories of the (finite) verb of which there were two and only two formal variants, i.e., enérgeia “performance” and páthos “experience” (generally referred to as the active and middle sets of personal endings respectively). Diáthesis was manifested in the personal ending of the verb, whose function was to represent various properties of the ‘subject’, i.e., its person and number as well as its diáthesis “disposition” – or general thematic relation – to the verb. The morpheme for the diáthesis enérgeia “performance” exhibited the active set of personal endings as its ‘form’ and expressed the person and number of the subject as well as the fact that it ‘performed’ the predication as its ‘schematic’ meaning; the morpheme for the diáthesis páthos “experience” exhibited the middle set of personal endings as its ‘form’ and expressed the person and number of the subject as well as the fact that it ‘experienced’ the predication as its ‘schematic’ meaning. Moreover, just as the other Greek (and Roman) grammarians, so too was Dionysios Thrax well aware of instances in which there was a discrepancy between ‘form’ and ‘meaning’. Accordingly, he incorporated such ‘anomalies’ into his definition by mentioning four concrete examples and labeling them with his technical term mesótēs “middle”: the first two examples were active forms which exhibited the meaning of páthos, whereas the second two examples were middle forms which exhibited the meaning of enérgeia.
References (37)
References
Allwood, Jens, Lars-Gunnar Andersson & Östen Dahl. 1977. Logic in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Paul Kent. 1989a. “Gibt es Passivmorphologie?”. Linguistische Berichte No. 1211.185–205.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Paul Kent. 1989b. “Remarks on the Origin of the Term Passive”. Lingua 791.1–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Paul Kent. 1991. A New Look at the Passive. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Paul Kent. 1992. “Aktive Passivkonstruktionen im Altgriechischen: Ein Beitrag zur Pragmatik”. Ms., Univ. of Bielefeld.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Paul Kent. 1993. “Eine alternative Sprachtypologie für das Reflexiv”. Folia Linguistica 271.107–146. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Paul Kent. In press. “Zur Diathese”. To appear in Historische Sprachforschung.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and Form. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collinge, N. E. 1963. “The Greek Use of the Term ‘Middle’ in Linguistic Analysis”. Word 191.232–241. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Delbrück, Bertold. 1897. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Zweiter Theil. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geniušiene, Emma. 1987. Typology of Reflexive Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, John, ed. 1985b. Natural Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hermodsson, Lars. 1952. Reflexive und intransitive Verba im älteren Westgermanischen. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilgard, Alfred, ed. 1894. Theodosii Alexandrini Canones. Georgii Choerobosci Scholia. Sophronii Patriarchae Alexandrini. (=
Grammatici Graeci IV: 1–2) Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilgard, Alfred, ed. 1901. Scholia in Dionysii Thracis Artem Grammaticam. (=
Grammatici Graeci 1:2.) Ibid.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jankuhn, Harald. 1969. Die passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache Homers. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kalbfleisch, Karl, ed. 1907. Simplicii in Aristotelis Categorias Commenat-rium. (=
Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, 8.) Berlin: G. Reimer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keil, Heinrich, ed. 1855–1880. Grammatici Latini. 81 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1961.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koivisto, Vesa. 1989. “Semantics of Karelian Reflexive Verbs”. Proceedings of the Fifth International Finno-Ugrist Students’ Conference, Helsinki, 22–26 May 1988 ed. by Riho Grünthal, Sirpa Penttinen & Tapani Salminen, 51–58. Helsinki: Castrenianum Complex of the Univ. of Helsinki Finno-Ugrian Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. & Pamela Munro. 1975. “Passives and Their Meaning”. Language 511.789–830. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neu, Erich. 1985. “Das frühindogermanische Diathesensystem. Funktion und Geschichte”. Grammatische Kategorien: Funktion und Geschichte. Akten der VII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Berlin, 20.-25. Februar 1983 ed. by Bernfried Schlerath, 275–295. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1992. “Iconicity and Generative Grammar”. Language 681.756–796. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polenz, Max. 1970. Die Stoa: Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung. 41. Auflage. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robins, R[obert] H. 1993. The Byzantine Grammarians: Their place in history. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schauwecker, Ludwig. 1960. “Die genera verbi im Französisch/Provenzalis-chen”. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 701.49–83.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiefer, Erhard. 1983. Überlegungen zur Tauglichkeit des Passivbegriffs und bisheriger Passivuntersuchungen, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung finnisch-ugrischer Sprachen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwyzer, Eduard. 1950. Griechische Grammatik. Zweiter Band: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. Ed. by Albert Debrunner. München: M. C. Beck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. “Passives and Related Constructions: A prototype analysis”. Language 611.821–848. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uhlig, Gustav, ed. 1883. Dionysii Thracis Ars Grammatica. (=
Grammatici Graeci I:1.) Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uhlig, Gustav, ed. 1910. Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt. (=
Grammatici Graeci II:2.) Ibid.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xolodovič, A. A. 1970. “Zalog [Voice]”. Kategorija zaloga: Materialy kon-ferencii, 2–26. Leningrad.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Pacchiarotti, Sara & Leonid Kulikov
2022.
Bribri media tantum verbs and the rise of labile syntax.
Linguistics 60:2
► pp. 617 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Benedetti, Marina
2014.
Pourquoi l'appelle-t-on moyen ? Apollonius Dyscole et les « figures moyennes ».
Langages N° 194:2
► pp. 9 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.