Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 21:1/2 (1994) ► pp.137–156

The Saleski family and the founding of the LSA linguistic institutes

 | Michigan State University
 | The University of Hong Kong
The Linguistic Institutes (LIs) of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA) were first envisaged by R. E. Saleski (1890–1971), an obscure scholar who for a time played a prominent role within the LSA (including the administration of the early LIs), but was inexplicably marginalized around 1931–32. E. H. Sturtevant’s 1940 history of the LI does not even mention Saleski’s name. Saleski proposed a course on “The Sociological Study of Language” for the 1929 LI – an extremely early date for such a course – and we consider the sources of his interest in this and related subjects. In addition to sketching Saleski’s life and career, we examine the careers of his sisters Else and Mary Agnes, like him minor academics, but steadfast members of LSA in its fledgling years.
Published online: 1 January 1994
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.21.1-2.08fal
References (49)
References
Barker, George C[arpenter] (1912–1958). 1945. “The Social Functions of Language”. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics 21.228–234.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1924. Review of Saussure 1922. Modern Language Journal 81.317–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1931. Review of Ries (1931). Lg. 71.204–209.Google Scholar
. 1933. Language. New York: H. Holt & Co.Google Scholar
De Laguna, Grace [Mead] Andrus. 1927. Speech: Its function and development. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. (Repr., Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1963.)Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1925. Experience and Nature. Chicago & London: Open Court. [Chapter 5: “Nature, Communication and Meaning” (166–207).]Google Scholar
Falk, Julia S. Forthcoming a. “Portraits of Women Linguists: Louise Pound, Edith Frances Claflin, E. Adelaide Hahn”. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences ed. by Kurt R. Jankowsky. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Forthcoming b. “Saussurean Concepts in America: Three phases”. [Unpublished; portions presented at the 38th Annual Conference of the International Linguistic Association, New York City, 17 April 1993.]
Furfey, Paul Hanly. 1944. “The Sociological Implications of Substandard English”. American Catholic Sociological Review 51.3–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry. 1966. “A Proposal for the Study of Folk Linguistics”. Sociolinguistics, ed. by William Bright, 16–26. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell H[athaway] & John Fought. 1975. “American Structuralism”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok et al., vol.XIII1: Historiography of Linguistics, 903–1176. The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Joos, Martin. (1907–1978). [1986(1976)]. Notes on the Development of the Linguistic Society of America 1924 to 1950. Preface by J Milton Cowan & Charles F. Hockett. [Ithaca, N.Y.: no publisher.]Google Scholar
Joseph, John E[arl]. 1990. “Ideologizing Saussure: Bloomfield’s and Chomsky’s Readings of the Cours de linguistique générale ”. Ideologies of Language ed. by John E. Joseph & Talbot J. Taylor, 51–78. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1992. “Paul Hanly Furfey and the Origins of American Sociolinguistics”. HL 191.111–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kent, Roland G[rubb]. 1930. Review of Albert Thumb, Handbuch des Sanskrit mit Texten und Glossar, 2nd rev. ed. by Herman Hirt (Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1930). Lg. 101.40–48.Google Scholar
. 1934. Review of Bloomfield (1933). Lg. 61.328–329.Google Scholar
. 1938. Review of Daniel Jones, An English Pronouncing Dictionary, 4th rev. ed. (New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1937) Lg. 141.78–79.Google Scholar
Koerner, E[rnst] F[rideryk] K[onrad]. 1991. “Toward a History of Modern Sociolinguistics”. American Speech 661.57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead, George H[erbert]. Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Ed. with introd. by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Mills, C[harles] Wright. (1916–1962). 1940. “Bibliographical Appendix”. Contemporary Social Theory ed. by Harry Elmer Barnes, Howard Becker & Frances Bennett Barnes, 889–912. New York: Russell & Russell. [Part 4, “Sociology of Language” (895–898).]Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. 1993. Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America: A social history. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. & Nancy Niedzielski. Forthcoming. Folk Linguistics.
Ries, John. (1857–1933). 1931. Was ist ein Satz? (= Beiträge zur Grundlegung der Syntax, 2.) Prague: Taussig & Taussig.Google Scholar
Rucker, Darnell. 1969. The Chicago Pragmatists. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Saleski, Maria Agnes. [1929]. Goethe als Erzieher Nietzsches. Doctoral diss., Univ. of Leipzig. (Printed, Leipzig: Schwarzenberg & Schumann, n.d.)Google Scholar
Saleski, Reinhold Eugen(e) August. 1924. Die Mittel der sprachlichen Mitteilung […]. Doctoral diss., Univ. of Freiburg. (Printed, Freiburg im Breisgau: K. Schillinger, 1924), 112 pp. [Review by Sturtevant. (1926).]Google Scholar
. 1926a. “Auf dem Wege zu einer nicht-historischen Sprachwissenschaft”. Monatshefte für deutsche Sprache und Pädagogik, 69–72.Google Scholar
. 1926b. “The Intrinsic Value of Foreign Language Study”. Paper presented at LSA 3rd Annual Meeting, Cambridge, Mass., 27 Dec. 1926. [Unpublished.]
. 1927. Review of R. B. Blakney, A Course in the Analysis of Chinese Characters (Shanghai: The Commercial Press, 1926). Lg. 31.272–273.Google Scholar
. 1930a. “Proceedings of the LSA Annual Meeting, 1929”. Lg. 61.102114.Google Scholar
. 1930b. Review of Henri Frei, Grammaire des fautes (Paris: Geuthner, 1929). Lg. 61.91–93.Google Scholar
. 1930c. Review of Theodor Kalepky, Neuaufbau der Grammatik (Leipzig & Berlin: B. G. Teubner, 1928). Lg. 61.88–90.Google Scholar
. 1930d. “Apposition as a Grammatical Term”. Paper presented at LSA 7th Annual meeting, Washington, D.C., 31 Dec. 1930. [Unpublished.]
. 1931. “The Principle of Form in Historical and Psychological Linguistics”. West Virginia Academy of Sciences Publications 1931, no.8.Google Scholar
. 1933. “English Words for Different Forms of Stone ”. Paper presented at LSA 10th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 29 Dec. 1933. [Unpublished.]
. 1934. “The Position of the Attribute Descriptive Adjective in Gothic”. Paper presented (by title only) at LSA 11th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, 29 Dec. 1934. [Unpublished.]
. 1935. “Linguistic Questions in Epistemology”. West Virginia Academy of Sciences Publications, 1935, no. 3.Google Scholar
. 1937. “Semantics as the Study of the Import of Words”. Paper presented at the Philadelphia Session of the 14th Annual Meeting of the LSA, 30 Dec. 1937. [Unpublished.]
. 1939. “Supernatural Agents in Christian Imagery: Word studies in Elizabethan dramatists”. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 381.431–439.Google Scholar
. 1950. Review of Johann Leo Weisgerber, Von den Kräften der deutschen Sprache, 21 vols. (Düsseldorf: Päd. Verlag Schwann, 19491950). Lg. 261.439–441.Google Scholar
. 1951. [Autobiographical entry]. Directory of American Scholars, 2nd ed., p.817. Lancaster, Pa.: The Science Press.Google Scholar
. 1964. [Autobiographical entry]. Directory of American Scholars, 4th ed., vol. III1, p. 217. New York: R. R. Bowker Co.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1922. Cours de linguistique générale. Publié par Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye, avec la collaboration d’Albert Riedlinger. 2nd ed. Paris: Payot. [1st ed., 1916.]Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W. 1990. “A Brief History of American Sociolinguistics, 19491989”. HL 171.183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steger, Hugo. 1972. “Middle High and New High German”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok et al., vol.91.1282–1344. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, E[dgar] H[oward]. 1926. Review of Saleski (1924). Lg. 21.193194.Google Scholar
1940. “History of the Linguistic Institute”. LSA Bulletin 131.83–89.Google Scholar
Weiss, A[lbert] P[aul] (1879–1931). 1928. Review of De Laguna (1927). Lg. 41.33–38.Google Scholar
Zawadowski, Leo. 1980. “The Definition of ‘Sentence’ and John Ries’ Theory”. Progress in Linguistic Historiography: Papers from the International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (Ottawa, 28–31 August 1978) ed. by Konrad Koerner, 271–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Testenoire, Pierre-Yves
2023. Aux origines du Cercle linguistique de New York. Historiographia Linguistica 50:2-3 ► pp. 268 ff. DOI logo
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2015. American Linguists Look at Swiss Linguistics, 1925–1940. Historiographia Linguistica 42:1 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Martin-Nielsen, Janet
2010. ‘This war for men’s minds’: the birth of a human science in Cold War America. History of the Human Sciences 23:5 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Falk, Julia S.
1998. The American shift from historical to non-historical linguistics: E.H. Sturtevant and the first Linguistic Institutes. Language & Communication 18:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Falk, Julia S. & John E. Joseph
1996. Further notes on Reinhold E. Saleski. Historiographia Linguistica 23:1-2 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Joseph, John E.
1996. The immediate sources of the ‘Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis’. Historiographia Linguistica 23:3 ► pp. 365 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.