Cover not available
Review article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 22:3 (1995) ► pp.379–399
Review article

The Structure of linguistic revolutions

| The University of Hong Kong
Published online: 1 January 1995
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.22.3.07jos
References (42)
References
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1959. Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior (New York: Appleton, 1957). Language 351.26–58.Google Scholar
. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
. 1972. Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1975 [1955–1956]. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Crane, Diana. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna. 1990. Edward Sapir: Linguist, anthropologist, humanist. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Droste, Flip G. & John E. Joseph, eds. 1991. Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description: Nine current approaches. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Earman, John. 1993. “Carnap, Kuhn, and the Philosophy of Scientific Methodology”. Horwich 1993.9–36.Google Scholar
Falk, Julia S. 1995. “Words Without Grammar: Linguists and the international auxiliary language movement in the United States”. Language and Communication 151.241–259.Google Scholar
Falk, Julia S. & John E. Joseph. 1996. “Further Notes on R. E. Saleski, with a reprint of his ‘Principle of Form in Historical and Psychological Linguistics’ (1931)”. HL 23 [no. 1/2].Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 1993. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The coming of science and technology studies. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Bennison [Barbara Bennison & Michael Gray]. 1974. “Toward a Semi-Revolution in Grammar”. Language Sciences 291.1–12.Google Scholar
Griffith, Belver C. & A. J. Miller. 1970. “Networks of Informal Communication among Scientifically Productive Scientists”. Communication among Scientists and Engineers ed. by C. Nelson & D. Pollock, 125–140. Lexington, Mass.: Heath.Google Scholar
Griffith, Belver C. & Nicholas C. Mullins. 1972. “Invisible Colleges: Small, coherent groups may be the same throughout science”. Science 1771.959–964.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1981. Critical Reflections on Generative Grammar. Transl. by Robert A. Hall, Jr. Lake Bluff, Ill.: Jupiter Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, S. J. 1994. “Transformational-Generativism: Evolution”. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, vol. IX1, 4650–4664. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press. [Rev. version in Koerner & Asher 1995.]Google Scholar
Harris, Randy Allen. 1990. The Life and Death of Generative Semantics. Ph.D. Diss., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y.Google Scholar
. 1993. “The Origin and Development of Generative Semantics”. HL 201.399–440.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul, ed. 1993. World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the nature of science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 1991. Review of Koerner (1989). Word 421.216–219.Google Scholar
1994a. Review of André Martinet, Mémoires d’un linguiste: Vivre les langues. Entretiens avec Georges Kassai et avec la collaboration de Jeanne Martinet (Paris: Quai Voltaire, 1993). HL 211.212–221.Google Scholar
1994b. “Twentieth-Century Linguistics: Overview of trends”. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, vol. IX1, 4789–4799. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press. [Rev. version in Koerner & Asher 1995.]Google Scholar
Forthcoming. “The Immediate Sources of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis”. HL 23 (1996), no. 1/2.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad. 1989. “The ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ and its Historiography: Observations of a bystander”. Practicing Linguistic Historiography: Selected Essays, 101–146. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [Earlier, much shorter, version in Language and Communication 31 (1983), 147–169.]Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad. & R. E. Asher, eds. 1995. Concise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the cognitivists. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1993. “Afterwords”. Horwich 1993.311–341.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1971. “On Generative Semantics”. Steinberg & Jakobovits 1971.232296.Google Scholar
Mullins, Nicholas C. 1973. Theories and Theory Groups in American Sociology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Murray, David J. 1995. Gestalt Psychology and the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. 1979. Social Science Networks. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Toronto.Google Scholar
1980. “Gatekeepers and the ‘Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 161.78–88.Google Scholar
1983. Group Formation in Social Science. Edmonton, Alta.: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
1989. “Recent Studies of American Linguistics”. HL 161.149–171.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1986 [1980]. Linguistic Theory in America. 2nd ed. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1975. Review of Steinberg & Jakobovits (1971). Foundations of Language 131.457–467.Google Scholar
Reisch, G. A. 1991. “Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism?” Philosophy of Science 581.264277.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1929. “Central and North American Languages”. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th ed., vol. V1,138–141. Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1933. “La réalité psychologique des phonèmes”. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 301.247–265. [English version, “The Psychological Reality of Phonemes”, in Edward Sapir, Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by David G. Mandelbaum, 46–60. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1949.]Google Scholar
Steinberg, Danny D. & Leon A. Jakobovits, eds. 1971. Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

De Oliveira Batista, Ronaldo
2020. Retóricas revolucionárias na linguística: recepção de teorias e novidade científica. Forma y Función 33:2 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Kertész, András
2010. From ‘scientific revolution’ to ‘unscientific revolution’: an analysis of approaches to the history of generative linguistics. Language Sciences 32:5 ► pp. 507 ff. DOI logo
Kertész, András
2010. Two Notions of ‘Research Program’ and the Historiography of Generative Linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 37:1-2 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Kertész, András
2019. Fallacies in the Historiography of Generative Linguistics. Foundations of Science 24:4 ► pp. 775 ff. DOI logo
Kertész, András
2023. Relativism Versus Absolutism in Linguistics. Foundations of Science DOI logo
Koerner, E.F.K.
2009. Koerner’s Korner. Historiographia Linguistica 36:2-3 ► pp. 481 ff. DOI logo
Altman, Cristina, Jon Mills, N. Guryanova, Werner Hüllen, Hiroyuki Eto, Joseph L. Subbiondo & John E. Joseph
1999. Review. Henry Sweet Society for the History of Linguistic Ideas Bulletin 32:1 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Chapter 4. On the disappearance of August Schleicher in the writings of the Neogrammarians. In Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 128], ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.