Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior (New York: Appleton, 1957). Language 351.26–58.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row.
Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam. 1975 [1955–1956]. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum.
Crane, Diana. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Darnell, Regna. 1990. Edward Sapir: Linguist, anthropologist, humanist. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.
Droste, Flip G. & John E. Joseph, eds. 1991. Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description: Nine current approaches. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Earman, John. 1993. “Carnap, Kuhn, and the Philosophy of Scientific Methodology”. Horwich 1993.9–36.
Falk, Julia S.1995. “Words Without Grammar: Linguists and the international auxiliary language movement in the United States”. Language and Communication 151.241–259.
Falk, Julia S. & John E. Joseph. 1996. “Further Notes on R. E. Saleski, with a reprint of his ‘Principle of Form in Historical and Psychological Linguistics’ (1931)”. HL 23 [no. 1/2].
Fuller, Steve. 1993. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The coming of science and technology studies. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
Gray, Bennison [Barbara Bennison & Michael Gray]. 1974. “Toward a Semi-Revolution in Grammar”. Language Sciences 291.1–12.
Griffith, Belver C. & A. J. Miller. 1970. “Networks of Informal Communication among Scientifically Productive Scientists”. Communication among Scientists and Engineers ed. by C. Nelson & D. Pollock, 125–140. Lexington, Mass.: Heath.
Griffith, Belver C. & Nicholas C. Mullins. 1972. “Invisible Colleges: Small, coherent groups may be the same throughout science”. Science 1771.959–964.
Hagège, Claude. 1981. Critical Reflections on Generative Grammar. Transl. by Robert A. Hall, Jr. Lake Bluff, Ill.: Jupiter Press.
Harlow, S. J.1994. “Transformational-Generativism: Evolution”. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, vol. IX1, 4650–4664. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press. [Rev. version in Koerner & Asher 1995.]
Harris, Randy Allen. 1990. The Life and Death of Generative Semantics. Ph.D. Diss., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y.
Harris, Randy Allen. 1993. “The Origin and Development of Generative Semantics”. HL 201.399–440.
Horwich, Paul, ed. 1993. World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the nature of science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Joseph, John E.1991. Review of Koerner (1989). Word 421.216–219.
Joseph, John E.1994a. Review of André Martinet, Mémoires d’un linguiste: Vivre les langues. Entretiens avec Georges Kassai et avec la collaboration de Jeanne Martinet (Paris: Quai Voltaire, 1993). HL 211.212–221.
Joseph, John E.1994b. “Twentieth-Century Linguistics: Overview of trends”. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, vol. IX1, 4789–4799. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press. [Rev. version in Koerner & Asher 1995.]
Joseph, John E. Forthcoming. “The Immediate Sources of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis”. HL 23 (1996), no. 1/2.
Koerner, E. F. Konrad. 1989. “The ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ and its Historiography: Observations of a bystander”. Practicing Linguistic Historiography: Selected Essays, 101–146. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [Earlier, much shorter, version in Language and Communication 31 (1983), 147–169.]
Koerner, E. F. Konrad. & R. E. Asher, eds. 1995. Concise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the cognitivists. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1970 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1993. “Afterwords”. Horwich 1993.311–341.
Mullins, Nicholas C.1973. Theories and Theory Groups in American Sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
Murray, David J.1995. Gestalt Psychology and the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Murray, Stephen O.1979. Social Science Networks. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Toronto.
Murray, Stephen O.1980. “Gatekeepers and the ‘Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 161.78–88.
Murray, Stephen O.1983. Group Formation in Social Science. Edmonton, Alta.: Linguistic Research.
Murray, Stephen O.1989. “Recent Studies of American Linguistics”. HL 161.149–171.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.1986 [1980]. Linguistic Theory in America. 2nd ed. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press.
Raskin, Victor. 1975. Review of Steinberg & Jakobovits (1971). Foundations of Language 131.457–467.
Reisch, G. A.1991. “Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism?” Philosophy of Science 581.264277.
Sapir, Edward. 1929. “Central and North American Languages”. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th ed., vol. V1,138–141. Univ. of Chicago Press.
Sapir, Edward. 1933. “La réalité psychologique des phonèmes”. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 301.247–265. [English version, “The Psychological Reality of Phonemes”, in Edward Sapir, Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by David G. Mandelbaum, 46–60. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1949.]
Steinberg, Danny D. & Leon A. Jakobovits, eds. 1971. Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
De Oliveira Batista, Ronaldo
2020. Retóricas revolucionárias na linguística: recepção de teorias e novidade científica. Forma y Función 33:2 ► pp. 41 ff.
Kertész, András
2010. From ‘scientific revolution’ to ‘unscientific revolution’: an analysis of approaches to the history of generative linguistics. Language Sciences 32:5 ► pp. 507 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.