John Wallis on adjectives the discovery of phrase structure in the Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae (1653)
One of the typical features of the early grammars of European vernaculars is their sketchy treatment of syntactic phenomena. The reason for this neglect is obvious: The steady orientation of grammarians towards the traditional word-class approach virtually necessitated the persistence of the view of a sentence as a linear arrangement of words. Though historians of grammar have acknowledged John Wallis’(1616–1703) attempt at freeing the grammar of English from the strait jacket of Latin grammar, they have seen his Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae (1653) in the word-based grammar tradition. In this paper I argue that beyond the fairly traditional organization and terminology of Wallis’ grammar lies a fundamentally different approach: Instead of basing his description of English on a fixed word-class system, Wallis seems to arrive at syntactic categories via the criteria of distribution and substitution. It is these criteria (which are constantly applied rather than stated) that lead Wallis to the discovery of phrases and their internal structure. Especially consistent and concise in this regard is Wallis’ description of the structure of the noun phrase in the chapter on “The adjectives”.
References (28)
References
Algeo, John. 1985. “The Earliest English Grammars”. Historical and Editorial Studies in Medieval and Early Modern English ed. by Mary-Jo Arn, Hanneke Wirtjes, with Hans Jansen, 191–207. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arnauld, Antoine & Claude Lancelot. 1676[1660]. Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Nouvelle edition rev. et augmentée de nouveau. Bruxelles: Chez Eug. Henry Fricx. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1973.) [1st ed., Paris: Pierre Le Petit, 1660.]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brekle, Herbert Ernst. 1975. “The Seventeenth Century”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. XIII1: Historiography of Linguistics, 277–350. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dalgarno, George. 1661. Ars Signorum, vulgo character universalis et lingua philosophica. London: J. Hayes. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, John Rupert. 1946. “The English School of Phonetics”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1946.92–132. (Repr. in Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951 by J. R. Firth, 92–110. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1957.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Funke, Otto. 1941. Die Frühzeit der englischen Grammatik: Die humanistisch-antike Sprachlehre und der nationalsprachliche Gedanke im Spiegel der frühneuenglischen Grammatiker von Bullokar (1586) bis Wallis (1653). Die grammatische Systematik und die Klassifikation der Redeteile. Bern: Herbert Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kemp, J. A[lan]. 1972. “Introduction”. In Wallis 1972[1765].l–73.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kohonen, Viljo. 1978. “On the Development of an Awareness of English Syntax in Early (1550–1660) Descriptions of Word Order by English Grammarians, Logicians and Rhetoricians”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 791.44–58.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kruisinga, Etsko. 1931/32 [1909]. A Handbook of Present-Day English. 5th ed., 2 parts, 41 vols. Groningen: Noordhoff.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehnert, Martin. 1936. Die Grammatik des englischen Sprachmeisters John Wallis (1616–1703). Breslau: Priebatsch.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCawley, James D. 1988. The Syntactic Phenomena of English. 21 vols. Chicago & London: Univ. of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padley, George A. 1976. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: The Latin tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padley, George A. 1985. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: Trends in vernacular grammar I. Ibid.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Percival, W. Keith. 1976. “On the Historical Sources of Immediate Constituent Analysis”. Notes from the Linguistic Underground ed. by James D. McCawley, 229–242. New York: Academic Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radford, Andrew. 1990. Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robins, R[obert] H[enry]. 1966. “The Development of the Word Class System of the European Grammatical Tradition”. Foundations of Language 21.3–19. (Repr. in Diversions of Bloomsbury: Selected writings on linguistics by Robert H. Robins, 185–203. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1970.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robins, R[obert] H[enry]. 1967. A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longmans. (3rd ed., 1990.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robins, R[obert] H[enry]. 1986. “The Evolution of English Grammar Books since the Renaissance”. The English Reference Grammar: Language and linguistics, writers and readers ed. by Gerhard Leitner, 292–306. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scaglione, Aldo. 1990. “The Origins of Syntax: Descartes or the Modistae”. History and Historiography of Linguistics: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences, Trier, 24–28 August 1987 ed. by Hans-Josef Niederehe & E. F. Konrad Koerner, 339–348. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Troike, Rudolph C[harles]. 1976. “Lest the Wheel be too oft Re-invented: Towards a reassessment of the intellectual history of linguistics”. Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill ed. by Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé & Werner Winter, vol. I1, 297–303. Lisse/ Holland: Peter de Ridder.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vorlat, Emma. 1975. The Development of English Grammatical Theory 1586–1737: With special reference to the theory of parts of speech. Leuven: Leuven Univ. Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wallis, John. 1765[1653]. Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. London: G. Bowyer. (New ed. with translation and commentary by J. A. Kemp. London: Longman, 1972.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wallis, John. 1693–1699. Opera mathematica et miscellanea. 31 vols., containing the 5th edition of the Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae in the 3rd1 vol. (1699). Oxford: E Theatro Sheldoniano. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1972.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Gardelle, Laure, Elise Mignot & Julie Neveux
2024.
Why the Morphosyntax/Semantics Interface Matters for Nouns. In
Nouns and the Morphosyntax / Semantics Interface,
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.