Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 23:1/2 (1996) ► pp.4772
References (28)
References
Algeo, John. 1985. “The Earliest English Grammars”. Historical and Editorial Studies in Medieval and Early Modern English ed. by Mary-Jo Arn, Hanneke Wirtjes, with Hans Jansen, 191–207. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine & Claude Lancelot. 1676[1660]. Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Nouvelle edition rev. et augmentée de nouveau. Bruxelles: Chez Eug. Henry Fricx. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1973.) [1st ed., Paris: Pierre Le Petit, 1660.]Google Scholar
Bartlett, Barrie E. 1987. “The Grammarian’s Contribution to the Study of Semantics: Renaissance to Enlightenment”. Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar and Philosophical Analysis of Language ed. by Dino Buzzetti & Maurizio Ferriani, 23–42. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brekle, Herbert Ernst. 1975. “The Seventeenth Century”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. XIII1: Historiography of Linguistics, 277–350. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, Ilinca. 1974. “John Wallis (1616–1703): A reappraisal of his contribution to the study of English”. HL 1:3.297–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalgarno, George. 1661. Ars Signorum, vulgo character universalis et lingua philosophica. London: J. Hayes. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.)Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert. 1946. “The English School of Phonetics”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1946.92–132. (Repr. in Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951 by J. R. Firth, 92–110. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1957.)Google Scholar
Funke, Otto. 1941. Die Frühzeit der englischen Grammatik: Die humanistisch-antike Sprachlehre und der nationalsprachliche Gedanke im Spiegel der frühneuenglischen Grammatiker von Bullokar (1586) bis Wallis (1653). Die grammatische Systematik und die Klassifikation der Redeteile. Bern: Herbert Lang.Google Scholar
Kemp, J. A[lan]. 1972. “Introduction”. In Wallis 1972[1765].l–73.Google Scholar
Kohonen, Viljo. 1978. “On the Development of an Awareness of English Syntax in Early (1550–1660) Descriptions of Word Order by English Grammarians, Logicians and Rhetoricians”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 791.44–58.Google Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko. 1931/32 [1909]. A Handbook of Present-Day English. 5th ed., 2 parts, 41 vols. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Lehnert, Martin. 1936. Die Grammatik des englischen Sprachmeisters John Wallis (1616–1703). Breslau: Priebatsch.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1988. The Syntactic Phenomena of English. 21 vols. Chicago & London: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Padley, George A. 1976. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: The Latin tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1985. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: Trends in vernacular grammar I. Ibid.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith. 1976. “On the Historical Sources of Immediate Constituent Analysis”. Notes from the Linguistic Underground ed. by James D. McCawley, 229–242. New York: Academic Press. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1990. Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robins, R[obert] H[enry]. 1966. “The Development of the Word Class System of the European Grammatical Tradition”. Foundations of Language 21.3–19. (Repr. in Diversions of Bloomsbury: Selected writings on linguistics by Robert H. Robins, 185–203. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1970.)Google Scholar
. 1967. A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longmans. (3rd ed., 1990.)Google Scholar
. 1973. “Theory-Orientation vs. Data-Orientation: A recurrent theme in linguistics”. HL 1:1.11–26. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. “The Evolution of English Grammar Books since the Renaissance”. The English Reference Grammar: Language and linguistics, writers and readers ed. by Gerhard Leitner, 292–306. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo. 1990. “The Origins of Syntax: Descartes or the Modistae”. History and Historiography of Linguistics: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences, Trier, 24–28 August 1987 ed. by Hans-Josef Niederehe & E. F. Konrad Koerner, 339–348. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Troike, Rudolph C[harles]. 1976. “Lest the Wheel be too oft Re-invented: Towards a reassessment of the intellectual history of linguistics”. Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill ed. by Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé & Werner Winter, vol. I1, 297–303. Lisse/ Holland: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar
Vorlat, Emma. 1975. The Development of English Grammatical Theory 1586–1737: With special reference to the theory of parts of speech. Leuven: Leuven Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wallis, John. 1765[1653]. Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. London: G. Bowyer. (New ed. with translation and commentary by J. A. Kemp. London: Longman, 1972.)Google Scholar
. 1693–1699. Opera mathematica et miscellanea. 31 vols., containing the 5th edition of the Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae in the 3rd1 vol. (1699). Oxford: E Theatro Sheldoniano. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1972.)Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Gardelle, Laure, Elise Mignot & Julie Neveux
2024. Why the Morphosyntax/Semantics Interface Matters for Nouns. In Nouns and the Morphosyntax / Semantics Interface,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.