Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 23:1/2 (1996) ► pp.4772
References
Algeo, John
1985 “The Earliest English Grammars”. Historical and Editorial Studies in Medieval and Early Modern English ed. by Mary-Jo Arn, Hanneke Wirtjes, with Hans Jansen, 191–207. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine & Claude Lancelot
1676[1660]Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Nouvelle edition rev. et augmentée de nouveau. Bruxelles: Chez Eug. Henry Fricx. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1973.) [1st ed., Paris: Pierre Le Petit 1660.]Google Scholar
Bartlett, Barrie E.
1987 “The Grammarian’s Contribution to the Study of Semantics: Renaissance to Enlightenment”. Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar and Philosophical Analysis of Language ed. by Dino Buzzetti & Maurizio Ferriani, 23–42. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brekle, Herbert Ernst
1975 “The Seventeenth Century”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. XIII1: Historiography of Linguistics, 277–350. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, Ilinca
Dalgarno, George
1661Ars Signorum, vulgo character universalis et lingua philosophica. London: J. Hayes. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1968.)Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert
1946 “The English School of Phonetics”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1946.92–132. (Repr. in Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951 by J. R. Firth, 92–110. London: Oxford Univ. Press 1957.)Google Scholar
Funke, Otto
1941Die Frühzeit der englischen Grammatik: Die humanistisch-antike Sprachlehre und der nationalsprachliche Gedanke im Spiegel der frühneuenglischen Grammatiker von Bullokar (1586) bis Wallis (1653). Die grammatische Systematik und die Klassifikation der Redeteile. Bern: Herbert Lang.Google Scholar
Kemp, J. A[lan]
1972 “Introduction”. In Wallis 1972[1765].l–73.Google Scholar
Kohonen, Viljo
1978 “On the Development of an Awareness of English Syntax in Early (1550–1660) Descriptions of Word Order by English Grammarians, Logicians and Rhetoricians”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 791.44–58.Google Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko
1931/32 [1909]A Handbook of Present-Day English. 5th ed., 2 parts, 41 vols. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Lehnert, Martin
1936Die Grammatik des englischen Sprachmeisters John Wallis (1616–1703). Breslau: Priebatsch.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1988The Syntactic Phenomena of English. 21 vols. Chicago & London: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian
1970English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Padley, George A.
1976Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: The Latin tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1985Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: Trends in vernacular grammar I. Ibid.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith
1976 “On the Historical Sources of Immediate Constituent Analysis”. Notes from the Linguistic Underground ed. by James D. McCawley, 229–242. New York: Academic Press. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
1990Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robins, R[obert] H[enry]
1966 “The Development of the Word Class System of the European Grammatical Tradition”. Foundations of Language 21.3–19. (Repr. in Diversions of Bloomsbury: Selected writings on linguistics by Robert H. Robins, 185–203. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1970.)Google Scholar
1967A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longmans. (3rd ed. 1990.)Google Scholar
1986 “The Evolution of English Grammar Books since the Renaissance”. The English Reference Grammar: Language and linguistics, writers and readers ed. by Gerhard Leitner, 292–306. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo
1990 “The Origins of Syntax: Descartes or the Modistae”. History and Historiography of Linguistics: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences, Trier, 24–28 August 1987 ed. by Hans-Josef Niederehe & E. F. Konrad Koerner, 339–348. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Troike, Rudolph C[harles]
1976 “Lest the Wheel be too oft Re-invented: Towards a reassessment of the intellectual history of linguistics”. Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill ed. by Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé & Werner Winter, vol. I1, 297–303. Lisse/ Holland: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar
Vorlat, Emma
1975The Development of English Grammatical Theory 1586–1737: With special reference to the theory of parts of speech. Leuven: Leuven Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wallis, John
1765[1653]Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. London: G. Bowyer. (New ed. with translation and commentary by J. A. Kemp. London: Longman 1972.)Google Scholar
1693–1699Opera mathematica et miscellanea. 31 vols., containing the 5th edition of the Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae in the 3rd1 vol. (1699) Oxford: E Theatro Sheldoniano. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1972.)Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Gardelle, Laure, Elise Mignot & Julie Neveux
2024. Why the Morphosyntax/Semantics Interface Matters for Nouns. In Nouns and the Morphosyntax / Semantics Interface,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.