Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 23:1/2 (1996) ► pp.200210
References (25)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1958. “Linguistics, Logic, Psychology, and Computers”. Computer Programming and Artificial Intelligence: An intensive course ed. by John W. Carr III1, 429–454. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Univ. of Michigan College of Engineering.Google Scholar
. 1959. Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F. Skinner (New York: Appleton, 1957). Language 351.26–57.Google Scholar
. 1962. “Explanatory Models in Linguistics”. Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ed. by Ernst Nagel, Patrick Suppes & Alfred Tarski, 528–550. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1975. “Introduction”. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, 1–53. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1980. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Harris, Randy A. 1993. The Linguistics Wars. Oxford & New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Huck, Geoffrey J. & John A. Goldsmith. 1994. The Ideological Structure of Linguistic Theory: Agreement and dissent within the Chomsky an paradigm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell & John Fought. 1981. American Structuralism. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971[1948], “Russian Conjugation”. Selected Writings by R. Jakobson, Vol.II1: Word and Language, 119–129. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1971[1949]. “The Phonemic and Grammatical Aspects of Language in Their Interrelations”. Ibid., 103–114.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Thomas G. Bever. 1976. “The Fall and Rise of Empiricism”. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability ed. by Thomas G. Bever, Jerrold J. Katz & D. Terence Langendoen, 11–64. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B. 1957. Review of Chomsky (1957). Language 331.375–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 1974. Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1979. Generative Grammar and Linguistic Competence. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
1981. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. 1980. “Gatekeepers and the ‘Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 161.73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ronat, Mitsou. 1972. “A propos du verbe ‘remind’ selon P. M. Postal, La sémantique générative: Une réminiscence du structuralisme?”. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica ed Applicata 11.233–267.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. & Henry Lee Smith. 1951. An Outline of English Structure. Norman, Okla.: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar
Voegelin, C[harles] F. & F[lorence] M. Voegelin. 1976. “Some Recent (and not so recent) Attempts to Interpret Semantics of Native Languages in North America”. American Indian Languages and American Linguistics ed. by Wallace L. Chafe, 75–98. Lisse, Holland: Peter de Ridder. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Stuurman, Frits, John Walmsley, Anneli Luhtala, Brigitte Nerlich, David D. Clarke, Robin D. Smith, Werner Hüllen, John Honey, L. F. van Driel, Werner Hüllen, M. G. Carter, Herman Bell, Werner Hüllen & Margaret J-M Sönmez
1997. Review. Henry Sweet Society for the History of Linguistic Ideas Bulletin 28:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.