Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 24:3 (1997) ► pp. 285306
Bloomfield, Leonard
1922Review of Sapir (1921). The Classical Weekly 151.142–143. (Repr. in A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology ed. by Charles F. Hockett, 91–94. Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press 1970.)Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1972Language and Mind. Extended ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna
1990Edward Sapir: Linguist, Anthropologist, Humanist. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Drechsel, Emanuel J.
1988 “Wilhelm von Humboldt and Edward Sapir: Analogies and Homologies in their Linguistic Thoughts”. In Honor of Mary Haas: From the Haas Festival Conference on Native American Linguistics ed. by William Shipley, 255–264. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Glasersfeld, Ernst von
1984 “An Introduction to Radical Constructivism”. The Invented Reality: How do we know what we believe we know? Contributions to Constructivism ed. by Paul Watzlawick, 17–40. New York & London: Norton.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
1960–1981Werke in fünf Bänden. ed. by Andreas Flitner & Klaus Giel. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
1988[1836]On Language. Transl. by Peter Heath, with an introduction by Hans Aarsleff. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1928An International Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1977 “The Humboldtian Trend in Linguistics”. Studies in Descriptive and Historical Linguistics: Festschrift for Winfred P. Lehmann ed. by Paul J. Hopper, 145–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 “Wilhelm von Humboldt and North American Ethnolinguistics: Boas (1894) – Hymes (1961)”. HL 171.111–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 “The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: A preliminary history and a bibliographical essay”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21.173–198. (Extended and revised version in Koerner, Professing Linguistic Historiography, 203–240. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1995.)Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1981 “Drift, Slope, and Slant: Background of, and variation upon, a Sapirian theme”. Language 571.535–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menze, Clemens
1965Wilhelm von Humboldts Lehre und Bild vom Menschen. Ratingen: Henn.Google Scholar
1975Die Bildungsreform Wilhelm von Humboldts. Hannover Dortmund-Darmstadt-Berlin: Hermann Schroedel.Google Scholar
1980Bildung und Bildungswesen. (= Hildesheimer Beiträge zu den Erziehungs- und Sozialwissenschaften, 13.) Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Müller-Vollmer, Kurt
1976 “Wilhelm von Humboldt und der Anfang der amerikanischen Sprachwissenschaft: Die Briefe an John Pickering”. Universalismus und Wissenschaft im Werk und Wirken der Brüder Humboldt ed. by Klaus Hammacher, 259–334. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Nünning, Ansgar
1988 “Selbsttätigkeit und Verstehen: Grundzüge des Denkens Wilhelm von Humboldts und ihre Gemeinsamkeiten mit dem radikalen Konstruktivismus”. Delfin 101.38–49.Google Scholar
1989 “Bildung durch Kunst: Wilhelm von Humboldts Konzeption ästhetischer Wirkung”. Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 341.51–63.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1907 “Herder’s Ursprung der Sprache ”. Modern Philology 51. 109–142. (Repr., with an introd. by K. Koerner, in HL 111.355–388 [1984].) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1912 “Language and Environment”. American Anthropologist 141. 226–242. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.89–103.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1921Language. An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
1924a “The Grammarian and His Language”. American Mercury 11. 149–155. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.150–159.)Google Scholar
1924b “Culture, Genuine and Spurious”. American Journal of Sociology 291.401–429. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.308–331.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1925 “Sound Patterns in Language”. Language 11.37–51. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.33–45.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1929 “The Status of Linguistics as a Science”. Language 51.207–214. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.160–166.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1931 “The Function of an International Auxiliary Language”. Psyche 111.4–15. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.110–121.)Google Scholar
1932 “Cultural Anthropology and Psychiatry”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 271.229–242. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.509–521.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1933a “La réalité psychologique des phonèmes”. Journal de psychologic normale et pathologique 301.247–265. (English original, “The Psychological Reality of Phonemes”, first published in Sapir 1949.46–60.)Google Scholar
1933b “Language”. Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 91.155–169. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.7–32.)Google Scholar
1934 “The Emergence of the Concept of Personality in a Study of Cultures”. Journal of Social Psychology 51.408–415. (Repr. in Sapir 1949 590–597.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1938 “Why Cultural Anthropology Needs the Psychiatrist”. Psychiatry 11.7–12. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.569–577.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1949Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality. ed. by David G. Mandelbaum. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Peter
1982 “Kunst und Sprache: Über den Zusammenhang von Sprachphilosophie und Ästhetik bei Wilhelm von Humboldt”. Sprachwissenschaft 71.40–57.Google Scholar
Sweet, Paul R.
1989Review of Humboldt (1988). HL 161.387–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabant, Jürgen
1990Traditionen Humboldts. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wax, Murray
1956 “The Limitations of Boas’ Anthropology”. American Anthropologist 581.63–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 128],  pp. 164 ff. Crossref logo
Rodseth, Lars
2018. Hegemonic Concepts of Culture: The Checkered History of Dark Anthropology. American Anthropologist 120:3  pp. 398 ff. Crossref logo
Vermeulen, Jeroen
2000.  In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.