Miscellaneous published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 26:3 (1999) ► pp. 262264
References
1963
 “Finnish Noun Morphology”. Quarterly Progress Report 68.180–186. Cambridge, Mass.: Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT.Google Scholar
1964
 Review of Robert T. Harms, Estonian Grammar (Bloomington: Indiana University; The Hague: Mouton 1962) Word 19.114–126.Google Scholar
1967a
 “Edward Sapir’s ‘Phonologic Representation’”. International Journal of American Linguistics 33.106–111. (Reprinted in McCawley 1979b:3–9 and also in Edward Sapir: Appraisals of his life and work ed. by Konrad Koerner, 153–158. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1984.)Google Scholar
1967b
 “The Phonological Theory behind Whitney’s Sanskrit Grammar”. Languages and Areas: Studies presented to George V. Bobrinskoy, 76–44. Chicago: Humanities Division, University of Chicago. (Reprinted in McCawley 1979:10–19.)Google Scholar
1968a
 “Lexical Insertion in a Transformational Grammar without Deep Structure”. Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society ed. by Paul M. Peranteau et al., 71–80. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:155–166.)Google Scholar
1968b
 “Concerning the Base Component of a Transformational Grammar”. Foundations of Language 4.243–269. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:35–58.)Google Scholar
1968c
 “The Role of Semantics in a Grammar”. Universals in Linguistic Theory ed. by Emmon Bach & Robert Harms, 124–169. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:59–98.)Google Scholar
1968d
 “A Note on Faroese Vowels”. Glossa 2.11–16. Burnaby, British Columbia: Department of Modern Languages, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
1968e
The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton. [Revised version of the authors’s dissertation, MIT 1965.)Google Scholar
1968f
 Review of Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol.III: Theoretical Foundations (The Hague: Moution 1966) Language 44.556–593. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c: 167–205.)Google Scholar
1970a
 “A Note on Tone in Tiv Conjugation”. Studies in African Linguistics 1.123–130.Google Scholar
1970b
 “English as a VSO Language”. Language 46.286–299. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:211–28; in Semantic Syntax ed. by Pieter Seuren, 74–95. Oxford: Clarendon 1974, and in The Logic of Grammar ed. by Donald Davidson & Gilbert H. Harman, 100–113. Encino: Dickenson 1975. – German translation in Generative Semantik ed. by Pieter Seuren, 150–174. Düsseldorf: Schwann 1973.)Google Scholar
1970c
 “Some Tonal Systems that Come Close to Being Pitch Accent Systems but Don’t Quite Make It”. Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 526–532. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1970d
 “Where Do Noun Phrases Come from”. Readings in English Transformational Grammar ed. by Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum, 166–183. Boston: Ginn & Co. (Revised version in Semantics ed. by Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits, 217–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1972; also reprinted in McCawley 1973c: 133–54. – Spanish translation in Semántica en la lingüística transformatoria ed. by V. Sanchez de Zavala, 232–258. Madrid: Ali-anza Editorial 1974; German translation in Syntax und generative Grammatik ed. by Ferenc Kiefer & David M. Perlmutter, vol.II, 129–160. Frankfurt: Athenaion 1974.)Google Scholar
1970e
 “Semantic Representation”. Cognition: A multiple view ed. by Paul L. Garvin, 227–247. New York: Spartan. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:240–256.)Google Scholar
1971a
 “Interpretative Semantics meets Frankenstein”. Foundations of Language 7.285–296. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:333–342.)Google Scholar
1971b
 “Tense and Time Reference in English”. Studies in Linguistic Semantics ed. by Charles J. Filmore & D. Terence Langendoen, 96–113. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:257–282.)Google Scholar
1973a
 “Tone in Tonga”. A Festschrift for Morris Halle ed. by Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky, 140–152. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
1973b
 “Global Rules and Bangubangu Tone”. Issues in Phonological Theory ed. by Michael Kenstowicz & Charles Kisseberth, 160–168. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1973c
Grammar and Meaning. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
1973d
 “Syntactic and Logical Arguments for Semantic Structures”. Three Dimensions of Linguistic Research ed. by Osamu Fujimura, 259–376. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
1974
 Review of Noam Chomsky & Morris Halle, The Sound Pattern of English (New York: Harper & Row 1968) International Journal of American Linguistics 40.50–88. (Reprinted in Essays on ‘The Sound Pattern of English’ ed. by Didier Goyvaerts & Geoffrey Pullum, 145–197. Ghent: E. Story-Scientia 1976.)Google Scholar
1975
 Review of Noam Chomsky, Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar (The Hague: Mouton 1972) Studies in English Linguistics (Tokyo) 3.209–311. (Reprinted in McCawley 1982:10–127.)Google Scholar
1976a
 “¡Madison Avenue, si, Pennsylvania Avenue, no!”. The Second LACUS Forum ed. by Peter A. Reich, 17–28. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam. (Reprinted in McCawley 1979:223–233.)Google Scholar
1976b
 (Editor). Notes from the Linguistic Underground. (= Syntax and Semantics, 7) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1978a
 “What is a Tone Language?”. Tone: A linguistic survey ed. by Victoria A. Fromkin, 113–131. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1978b
 “Conversational Implicature and the Lexicon”. Pragmatics ed. by Peter Cole (= Syntax and Semantics, 9), 245–259. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1979
Adverbs, Vowels, and Other Objects of Wonder. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1981a
Everything Linguists Always Wanted to Know about Logic (But Were Ashamed to Ask). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1981b
 “An Un-Syntax”. Current Approaches to Syntax ed. by Edith Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (= Syntax and Semantics, 13), 167–193. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1982
Thirty Million Theories of Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1984
 Introduction to reprint of Otto Jespersen, Analytic Syntax [1933], xi–xix. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1985
 “Kuhnian Paradigms as Systems of Markedness Conventions”. Linguistics and Philosophy: Studies in honor of Rulon S. Wells ed. by Adam Makkai & Alan K. Melby, 23–43. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1987
 “A Case of Syntactic Mimicry”. Functionalism ed. by Réné Dirven & Vilém Fried, 459–470. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1988a
The Syntactic Phenomena of English. 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (2nd rev. ed. in 1 volume 1998.)Google Scholar
1988b
 Review of Noam Chomsky, Knowledge of Language: Its nature, origin and use (New York: Praeger 1986) Language 64.355–365.Google Scholar
1988b. 1991
 “Contrastive Negation and Metalinguistic Negation”. Papers from the 27th Meetimg of the Chicago Linguistics Society, vol.11, 189–206. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1988b. 1992a
 “Modifiers Hosted by Indefinite and Interrogative Pronouns”. Linguistic Inquiry 23.663–637.Google Scholar
1992b
 Introduction and index to reprint of Otto Jespersen, The Philosophy of Grammar [1924], 1–9 and 315–363. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
1992c
 “The Biological Side of Otto Jespersen’s Linguistic Thought”. Historio-graphia Linguistica 19.97–110.Google Scholar
1993
 Introduction to reprint of Otto Jespersen, Progress in Language [1894], ix–xvii. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1995a
 Review of Peter H. Matthews, Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992) Journal of Linguistics 31.444–453.Google Scholar
1995b
 “Generative Semantics”. Handbook of Pragmatics ed. by Jeff Verschuren et al., 311–319. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1995c
 “The Focus and Scope of only”. Discourse and Meaning ed. by Barbara H. Partee & Petr Sgall, 171–193. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1996a
 “Conversational Scorekeeping and the Interpretation of Conditional Sentences”. Grammatical Constructions ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson, 77–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1996b
 “Acceptability Judgments in the Teaching and Doing of Syntax”. Papers from the 32nd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar