Cover not available
Part of
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 26:3 (1999) ► pp.262–264
Miscellaneous

Select Bibliography of James D. McCawley's Writings

 | University of Ottawa
Published online: 7 January 2000
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.26.3.03sel
References (46)
1963. “Finnish Noun Morphology”. Quarterly Progress Report 681.180–186. Cambridge, Mass.: Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT.Google Scholar
1964. Review of Robert T. Harms, Estonian Grammar (Bloomington: Indiana University; The Hague: Mouton, 1962). Word 191.114–126.Google Scholar
1967a. “Edward Sapir’s ‘Phonologic Representation’”. International Journal of American Linguistics 331.106–111. (Reprinted in McCawley 1979b:3–9 and also in Edward Sapir: Appraisals of his life and work ed. by Konrad Koerner, 153–158. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1984.)Google Scholar
1967b. “The Phonological Theory behind Whitney’s Sanskrit Grammar”. Languages and Areas: Studies presented to George V. Bobrinskoy, 76–44. Chicago: Humanities Division, University of Chicago. (Reprinted in McCawley 1979:10–19.)Google Scholar
1968a. “Lexical Insertion in a Transformational Grammar without Deep Structure”. Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society ed. by Paul M. Peranteau et al., 71–80. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:155–166.)Google Scholar
1968b. “Concerning the Base Component of a Transformational Grammar”. Foundations of Language 41.243–269. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:35–58.)Google Scholar
1968c. “The Role of Semantics in a Grammar”. Universals in Linguistic Theory ed. by Emmon Bach & Robert Harms, 124–169. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:59–98.)Google Scholar
1968d. “A Note on Faroese Vowels”. Glossa 21.11–16. Burnaby, British Columbia: Department of Modern Languages, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
1968e. The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton. [Revised version of the authors’s dissertation, MIT, 1965.)Google Scholar
1968f. Review of Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol.III1: Theoretical Foundations (The Hague: Moution, 1966). Language 441.556–593. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c: 167–205.)Google Scholar
1970a. “A Note on Tone in Tiv Conjugation”. Studies in African Linguistics 11.123–130.Google Scholar
1970b. “English as a VSO Language”. Language 461.286–299. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:211–28; in Semantic Syntax ed. by Pieter Seuren, 74–95. Oxford: Clarendon, 1974, and in The Logic of Grammar ed. by Donald Davidson & Gilbert H. Harman, 100–113. Encino: Dickenson, 1975. – German translation in Generative Semantik ed. by Pieter Seuren, 150–174. Düsseldorf: Schwann, 1973.)Google Scholar
1970c. “Some Tonal Systems that Come Close to Being Pitch Accent Systems but Don’t Quite Make It”. Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 526–532. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1970d. “Where Do Noun Phrases Come from”. Readings in English Transformational Grammar ed. by Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum, 166–183. Boston: Ginn & Co. (Revised version in Semantics ed. by Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits, 217–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972; also reprinted in McCawley 1973c: 133–54. – Spanish translation in Semántica en la lingüística transformatoria ed. by V. Sanchez de Zavala, 232–258. Madrid: Ali-anza Editorial, 1974; German translation in Syntax und generative Grammatik ed. by Ferenc Kiefer & David M. Perlmutter, vol.II1, 129–160. Frankfurt: Athenaion, 1974.)Google Scholar
1970e. “Semantic Representation”. Cognition: A multiple view ed. by Paul L. Garvin, 227–247. New York: Spartan. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:240–256.)Google Scholar
1971a. “Interpretative Semantics meets Frankenstein”. Foundations of Language 71.285–296. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:333–342.)Google Scholar
1971b. “Tense and Time Reference in English”. Studies in Linguistic Semantics ed. by Charles J. Filmore & D. Terence Langendoen, 96–113. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Reprinted in McCawley 1973c:257–282.)Google Scholar
1973a. “Tone in Tonga”. A Festschrift for Morris Halle ed. by Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky, 140–152. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
1973b. “Global Rules and Bangubangu Tone”. Issues in Phonological Theory ed. by Michael Kenstowicz & Charles Kisseberth, 160–168. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1973c. Grammar and Meaning. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
1973d. “Syntactic and Logical Arguments for Semantic Structures”. Three Dimensions of Linguistic Research ed. by Osamu Fujimura, 259–376. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
1974. Review of Noam Chomsky & Morris Halle, The Sound Pattern of English (New York: Harper & Row, 1968). International Journal of American Linguistics 401.50–88. (Reprinted in Essays on ‘The Sound Pattern of English’ ed. by Didier Goyvaerts & Geoffrey Pullum, 145–197. Ghent: E. Story-Scientia, 1976.)Google Scholar
1975. Review of Noam Chomsky, Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar (The Hague: Mouton, 1972). Studies in English Linguistics (Tokyo) 31.209–311. (Reprinted in McCawley 1982:10–127.)Google Scholar
1976a. “¡Madison Avenue, si, Pennsylvania Avenue, no!”. The Second LACUS Forum ed. by Peter A. Reich, 17–28. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam. (Reprinted in McCawley 1979:223–233.)Google Scholar
1976b. (Editor). Notes from the Linguistic Underground. (= Syntax and Semantics, 7) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1978a. “What is a Tone Language?”. Tone: A linguistic survey ed. by Victoria A. Fromkin, 113–131. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1978b. “Conversational Implicature and the Lexicon”. Pragmatics ed. by Peter Cole (= Syntax and Semantics, 9), 245–259. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979. Adverbs, Vowels, and Other Objects of Wonder. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1981a. Everything Linguists Always Wanted to Know about Logic (But Were Ashamed to Ask). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1981b. “An Un-Syntax”. Current Approaches to Syntax ed. by Edith Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (= Syntax and Semantics, 13), 167–193. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1982. Thirty Million Theories of Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1984. Introduction to reprint of Otto Jespersen, Analytic Syntax [1933], xi–xix. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1985. “Kuhnian Paradigms as Systems of Markedness Conventions”. Linguistics and Philosophy: Studies in honor of Rulon S. Wells ed. by Adam Makkai & Alan K. Melby, 23–43. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. “A Case of Syntactic Mimicry”. Functionalism ed. by Réné Dirven & Vilém Fried, 459–470. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1988a. The Syntactic Phenomena of English. 21 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (2nd rev. ed. in 11 volume, 1998.)Google Scholar
1988b. Review of Noam Chomsky, Knowledge of Language: Its nature, origin and use (New York: Praeger, 1986). Language 641.355–365.Google Scholar
1988b. 1991. “Contrastive Negation and Metalinguistic Negation”. Papers from the 27th Meetimg of the Chicago Linguistics Society, vol.111, 189–206. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1988b. 1992a. “Modifiers Hosted by Indefinite and Interrogative Pronouns”. Linguistic Inquiry 231.663–637.Google Scholar
1992b. Introduction and index to reprint of Otto Jespersen, The Philosophy of Grammar [1924], 1–9 and 315–363. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
1992c. “The Biological Side of Otto Jespersen’s Linguistic Thought”. Historio-graphia Linguistica 191.97–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. Introduction to reprint of Otto Jespersen, Progress in Language [1894], ix–xvii. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995a. Review of Peter H. Matthews, Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992). Journal of Linguistics 311.444–453.Google Scholar
1995b. “Generative Semantics”. Handbook of Pragmatics ed. by Jeff Verschuren et al., 311–319. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1995c. “The Focus and Scope of only”. Discourse and Meaning ed. by Barbara H. Partee & Petr Sgall, 171–193. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1996a. “Conversational Scorekeeping and the Interpretation of Conditional Sentences”. Grammatical Constructions ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson, 77–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1996b. “Acceptability Judgments in the Teaching and Doing of Syntax”. Papers from the 32nd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

[no author supplied]
2021. Bibliography of writings by E. F. Konrad Koerner. Historiographia Linguistica 48:2-3 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.