Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 27:1 (2000) ► pp.79102
References (54)
References
Bakhtin [Baxtin], Mikhael [Mixail] M[ixajloviã]. 1973[1929]. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Translation of second edition. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Karoma.Google Scholar
. 1979. Estitika slovesnogo tvorãestva [The aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow: Iskusstvo.Google Scholar
. 1981[1934/35]. “Discourse in the Novel”. The Dialogic Imagination. Four essays ed. by Michael Holquist (transl. by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist), 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1986[1952/53]. “The Problem of Speech Genres”. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays ed. by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (transl. by Vern W. McGee), 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1993[1986]. Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Transl. and notes by V. Liapunov; ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. Sobranie soãinenii [Collected writings]. Vol.V1. Moscow: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
Barnard, F. M., ed., 1969. J. G. Herder On Social and Political Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dentith, Simon. 1995. Bakhtinian Thought: An introductory reader. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 1929[1925.]. Experience and Nature. 3rd ed. London: Allen & Unwin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erdmann, Karl Otto. 1910[1900]. Die Bedeutung des Wortes: Aufsätze aus dem Grenzgebiet der Sprachpsychologie und Logik. 21. Aufl. Leipzig: Avenarius. (4th ed., 1925.)Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert. 1957[1935]. “The Use and Distribution of Certain English Sounds”. Papers in Linguistics 1934–51, 34–46. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1964[1937/1930]. The Tongues of Men & Speech. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, (Sir) Alan Henderson. 1951[1932]. The Theory of Speech and Language. 2nd ed., with additions [pp.328–344]. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Repr., 1963.)Google Scholar
Grübel, Rainer. 1998. “Der Russische Formalismus”. Semiotik/Semiotics: Ein Handbuch zu den zeichentheoretischen Grundlagen von Natur und Kultur/A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture ed. by Roland Posner, Kurt Robering & Thomas A. Sebeok, vol.II1, 2233–2248. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M[ichael] A. K. 1975. “Language as Social Semiotic: Towards a general sociolinguistic theory”. The First LACUS Forum. Ed. by Adam Makkai & Valerie Becker Makkai, 17–46. Columbia, S.C.: The Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1772. Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache. Leipzig: Voss.Google Scholar
Holquist, Michael. 1990. Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1998. “Emergent Grammar”. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure ed. by Michael Tomasello, 155–175. Mahwah, N.J. & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hülzer-Vogt, Heike. 1993. “Réflexions sémantiques d’un romaniste: Léo Spitzer (1887–1960) sur le changement de sens”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 15:1. 111–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1963[1827]. “Ueber den Dualis”. Werke in Fünf Bänden ed. by Andreas Flitner & Klaus Giel, Bd. III1: Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie, 113–143. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
. 1988[1836]. On Language: The diversity of human language-structure and its influence on the mental development of mankind. Transl. by Peter Heath. Introduction by Hans Aarsleff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jäger, Ludwig. 1975. Zu einer Rekonstruktion der authentischen Sprach-Idee Ferdinand de Saussures. Dissertation, Universität Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb. Cambridge, Mass.: Department of Slavic Languages and Literature, Russian Language Project, Harvard University.Google Scholar
. 1972. “Verbal Communication”. Scientific American 227:3.72–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language. Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: Allen & Unwin; New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Lähteenmäki, Mika. 1998a. “On Meaning and Understanding: A dialogical approach”. Dialogism 11.74–91.Google Scholar
. 1998b. “On Dynamics and Stability: Saussure, Voloshinov, and Baxtin”. Dialogues on Baxtin: Interdisciplinary readings ed. by Mika Lähteenmaki & Hannele Dufva, 51–70. Jyväskylä, Finland: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1953[1923]. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages”. Charles K. Ogden & Ivor A. Richards, The Meaning of Meaning. Supplement I [= pp.296–336]. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Edited with an introduction by Charles W. Morris. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1905. “Comment les mots changent de sens”. Année sociologique 91:230–271. (Repr. in Linguistique historique et linguistique générale I1, 230–271. Paris: Champion, 1921.)Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul. 1998. “Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich (1895–1975)”. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. by Edward Craig et al., vol. I1, 638b–645b. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt 1992. “Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Introduction to the Kawi Language”. Semiotica 93:1/2.125–144. [Review Article on Humboldt 1988.]Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte. 1990. Change in Language: Whitney, Bréal and Wegener. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1992. Semantic Theories in Europe, 1830–1930. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke. 1995. “The 1930s – at the Birth of a Pragmatic Conception of Language”. HL 22:3.311–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Language, Action, and Context: The early history of prag matics in Europe and America, 1780–1930. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Humboldt, Wilhelm von”. Handbook of Pragmatics ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen, 1–14. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. In press. “Semantic Fields and Frames: Historical explorations at the interface between language, action, and cognition”. Journal of Pragmatics.
Nyrop, Kristoffer. 1913. Sémantique. [= Vol. IV1 of his Grammaire historique de la langue française]. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.Google Scholar
Pateman, Trevor. 1989. “Pragmatics in Semiotics: Bakhtin/Volosinov”. Journal of Literary Semantics 18:3.203–216.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1880. Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer. (2nd rev. ed., 1886; 5th ed., 1920.)Google Scholar
Paulhan, Frédéric. 1886. “Le langage intérieur et la pensée”. Revue Philosophique 211.26–58.Google Scholar
. 1927. “La double fonction du langage”. Revue Philosophique 1041.22–73.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Éd. par Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye, avec la collaboration de Albert Riedlinger. Paris & Lausanne: Payot. (3rd, corrected ed., 1931.)Google Scholar
Schmitter, Peter. 1987. Das sprachliche Zeichen. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Shotter, John & Michael Billig. 1998. “A Bakhtinian Psychology: From out of the heads of individuals and into the dialogues between them”. Bakhtin and the Human Sciences ed. by Michael Gardiner & Michael Mayerfeld Bell, 3–29. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vassilyev, Leon. 1974. “The Theory of Semantic Fields”. Linguistics 1371.79–93.Google Scholar
Voloshinov [Volo‰inov], V[alentin] N[ikolaeviã]. 1983[1926]. “Discourse in Life and Discourse in Poetry: Questions of sociological poetics”. Bakhtin School Papers ed. by Ann Shukman, 5–30. Oxford: RPT Publications in association with Dept. of Literature, University of Essex; Oxford: Distributed by Holdan Books.Google Scholar
. 1986[1929]. Marxism and the Philosophy of language. Transl. from the Russian by Ladislav Matejka & I. R. Titunik. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev Semanovitch. 1962[1934]. Thought and Language. Translated by Gertrud Vakar & Eugenia Hanfmann. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, Philipp. 1991[1885]. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer. (New ed. prepared by E. F. K. Koerner, with an introduction by Clemens Knobloch, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1991.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1902. Review of Berthold Delbrück, Grundfragen der Sprachforschung mit Rücksicht auf W. Wundts Sprachpsychologie erörtert. (Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner, 1901). Literarisches Centralblatt Nr. 121 (22 March 1902).cols 401–410.Google Scholar
Weisgerber, Leo. 1927. “Die Bedeutungslehre: Ein Irrweg der Sprachwissenschaft?Germanisch Romanische Monatsschrift 151.161–183.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Nerlich, B.
2006. Pragmatics: History. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Lähteenmäki, Mika
2002. Vološinov and Cassirer. Historiographia Linguistica 29:1-2  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Chapter 8. The Baxtin myth and its historiography. In Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 128],  pp. 194 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.