Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 28:3 (2001) ► pp.435442
Chomsky, Noam
1975[1955]The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum. (Repr., with an index compiled by Jan van Voorst, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1985.)Google Scholar
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E.
1976A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1986 “Has there Been a ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ in Linguistics?”. Language 621.1–19. (Repr. in F. J. Newmeyer, Generative Linguistics: A historical perspective, 23–38. London & New York: Routledge 1996.)Google Scholar
Ogden, C[harles] K. & I[vor] A. Richards
1923The Meaning of Meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.; New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith
1981 “The Saussurean Paradigm: Fact or fantasy?”. Semiotica 361.33–49.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk van
1998 “GLOW 1978–1998”. Glot International 31.18–19.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Peter S.
1967The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1966[1916]Course in General Linguistics. Transl. by Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1876 “Words, Logic, and Grammar”. Transactions of the Philological Society n.v.[201].470–503.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: C. Klincksieck. (2nd ed. 1966.)Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V[alentin] N.
1973[1929]Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Transl. from the Russian by Ladislav Matejka & I. R. Titunik. New York: Seminar Press. (Repr., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1984.)Google Scholar