Vološinov and Cassirer
A case of plagiarism?
Recently, it has been suggested that Valentin Vološinov (1895–1936) plagiarised Ernst Cassirer (1874–1945). This claim is to be seen as grossly overstated, although Vološinov obviously benefited from Cassirer’s work on language. This article compares Vološinov’s and Cassirer’s concepts of the sign and discusses their views concerning the relation between language and reality. There are fundamental differences between their views on the nature of the sign which mainly stem from the fact that they are committed to different philosophical paradigms. Thus, the validity of the claims according to which philosophical sources of the dialogical conception of the sign can be found in Cassirer’s works should be seriously questioned.
References (41)
References
Alpatov, V[ladimir] M[ixajlovicˇ]. 1991. Istorija odnogo mifa: Marr i marrizm [The history of a myth: Marr and Marrism]. Moskva: Izd. “Nauka”.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baxtin, M[ixail] M[ixajlovicˇ]. 1996. Besedy V. D. Duvakina s M. M. Baxtinym [V. D. Duvakin’s conversations with M. M. Baxtin]. Moskva: Izd. “Progress”.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bogdanov, A[leksandr] A[leksandrovicˇ]. 1995 [1918]. “Metody truda i metody poznanija [The methods of labour and the methods of cognition]”. Russkij pozitivizm: Lesevicˇ, Juškevicˇ, Bogdanov [Russian positivism: Lesevicˇ, Juškevicˇ, Bogdanov]. Ed. by S[tanislav] S[ergeevicˇ] Gusev, 241–258. Sankt-Peterburg: Izd. “Nauka”.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandist, Craig. 1997. “Bakhtin, Cassirer and Symbolic Forms”. Radical Philosophy 851.20–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandist, Craig. 1999. “Bakhtin’s Grand Narrative: The significance of the Renaissance”. Dialogism 31.11–30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandist, Craig. 2000. “Neo-Kantianism in Cultural Theory”. Radical Philosophy 1021.6–16.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandist, Craig. 2002. The Bakhtin Circle: Philosophy, culture, and politics. London: Pluto Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buxarin, N[ikolaj] I[vanovicˇ]. 1921. Teorija istoricˇeskogo materializma: Populjarnyj ucˇebnik marksistskoj sociologii [The theory of historical materialism: A popular textbook of Marxist sociology]. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buxarin, N[ikolaj] I[vanovicˇ]. 1926 [1921]. Historical Materialism: A system of sociology. Anonymous authorised translation. London: George Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cassirer, Ernst. 1923. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Erster Teil: Die Sprache. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cassirer, Ernst. 1946 [1925]. Language and Myth. Transl. by Susanne K. Langer. New York: Dover Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cassirer, Ernst. 1953 [1923]. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. I1: Language. Transl. by Ralph Manheim. New Haven: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cassirer, Ernst. 1957 [1929]. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. III1: The Phenomenology of Knowledge. Transl. by Ralph Manheim. New Haven: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deborin, A[bram] M[oiseevicˇ]. 1935. “Novoe ucˇenie o jazyke i dialekticˇeskij materializm [The new doctrine of language and dialectical materialism]”. Otdel’nyj ottisk iz Jubilejnogo sbornika v cˇest’ N. Ja. Marra, 3–60. Moskva: Izd. Akademii Nauk SSSR.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gardiner, Michael. 1992. The Dialogics of Critique: M. M. Bakhtin and the theory of ideology. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffmann, Johann Joseph. 1877. Japanische Sprachlehre. Nach der holländischen Ausgabe von 1868 ins Deutsche übertragen. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krois, John Michael. 1987. Cassirer: Symbolic forms and history. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lähteenmäki, Mika. 1998. “On Dynamics and Stability: Saussure, Voloshinov, and Bakhtin”. Dialogues on Bakhtin: Interdisciplinary readings ed. by Mika Lähteenmäki & Hannele Dufva, 51–69. Jyväskylä: Centre for Applied Language Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lotze, Hermann. 1874–1879. System der Philosophie. 21 vols. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marr, N[ikolaj] Ja[kovlevicˇ]. 1926. Po etapam razvitija jafeticˇeskoj teorii: Sbornik statej N. Ja. Marra [On the stages of the development of the Japhetic theory: A collection of articles by N. Ja. Marr]. Moskva & Leningrad: Naucˇno-issledovatel’-skij institut etnicˇeskix i nacional’nyx kul’tur narodov vostoka SSSR.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mathews, Robert H. 1902. “Aboriginal Languages of Victoria”. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 361.71–106.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moss, Kevin. 1994. “Byla li Ol’ga Frejdenberg marristkoj? [Was Ol’ga Freidenberg a Marrist?]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1994: 51.98–106.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noiré, Ludwig. 1877. Der Ursprung der Sprache. Mainz: Victor von Zabern.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poole, Brian. 1998. “Bakhtin and Cassirer: The philosophical origins of Bakhtin’s carnival messianism”. The South Atlantic Quarterly, Summer/Fall 1998, 3/41.537–578.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poole, Brian. 2001. “From Phenomenology to Dialogue: Max Scheler’s phenomenological tradition and Mikhail Bakhtin’s development from ‘Towards the philosophy of the act’ to his study of Dostoevsky”. Bakhtin and Cultural Theory, revised and expanded second edition prepared by Ken Hirschkop & David Shepherd, 109–135. Manchester: Manchester University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spitzer, Leo. 1922. Italienische Umgangssprache. Bonn & Leipzig: K. Schroeder.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomas, Lawrence L. 1957. The Linguistic Theories of N. Ja. Marr. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tihanov, Galin. 1998. “Vološinov, Ideology, and Language: The birth of Marxist sociology from the spirit of Lebensphilosophie
”. The South Atlantic Quarterly, Summer/Fall 1998, 3/41.599–621.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tihanov, Galin. 2001. “Contextualising Bachtin: Two poems by Mandel’štam”. Russian Literature 50:2.165–184. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vološinov, V[alentin] N[ikolaevicˇ]. 1926. “Slovo v žizni i slovo v poezii [Discourse in life and discourse in poetry]”. Zvezda 61.244–267.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vološinov, V[alentin] N[ikolaevicˇ]. 1930. “Stilistika xudožestvennoj recˇi: Cˇ to takoe jazyk [Literary stylistics: What is language]”. Literaturnaja ucˇeba 21.48–66.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vološinov, V[alentin] N[ikolaevicˇ]. 1973 [1929]. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Transl. by Ladislav Matejka & Irwin R. Titunik. New York & London: Seminar Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vološinov, V[alentin] N[ikolaevicˇ]. 1983a [1926]. “Discourse in Life and Discourse in Poetry”. Bakhtin School Papers transl. by John Richmond, ed. by Ann Shukman, 5–30. Oxford: RPT Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vološinov, V[alentin] N[ikolaevicˇ]. 1983b [1928]. “The Latest Trends in Linguistic Thought in the West”. Bakhtin School Papers transl. by Noel Owen, ed. by Ann Shukman, 31–49. Oxford: RPT Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vološinov, V[alentin] N[ikolaevicˇ]. 1983c [1930]. “Literary Stylistics: What is language?”. Bakhtin School Papers transl. by Noel Owen, ed. by Ann Shukman, 93–113. Oxford: RPT Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vološinov, V[alentin] N[ikolaevicˇ]. 1987 [1927]. Freudianism: A critical sketch. Transl. by Irwin R. Titunik. Ed. by I. R. Titunik & Neal H. Bruss. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vološinov, V[alentin] N[ikolaevicˇ]. 1995. “Licˇnoe delo V. N. Vološinova [V. N. Vološinov’s personal file]”. Dialog. Karnaval. Xronotop 21.70–99.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, James. 1995. “Ot filosofii k vseobšcˇej organizacionnoj nauke: istocˇniki I predšestvenniki tektologii A. Bogdanova [From philosophy to universal organisation science: sources and precursors of A. Bogdanov’s tektology]”. Voprosy filosofii 81.38–49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Transl. and ed. by Gertrude E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Lähteenmäki, Mika
2006.
Nikolai Marr and the idea of a unified language.
Language & Communication 26:3-4
► pp. 285 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.