Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 29:3 (2002) ► pp. 293327
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Amsler, M.
2006.  In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,  pp. 218 ff. Crossref logo
Isermann, Michael M.
2007. Letters, sounds and things. Historiographia Linguistica 34:2-3  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

A.Grammatical texts

Aimericus
. Ars Lectoria Ed. by Harry F. Reijnders. Vivarium 9.119–137 (1971); 10.41–101 and 124–176 (1972).Google Scholar
Donatus Ortigraphus
Ed. by John Chittenden (= Corpus Christianorum. Continuatio medievalis XLD). Turnholt: Brepols 1982.Google Scholar
Glosa ‘Promisimus’ (Prom.)
Ed. by Karin Margareta Fredborg. “ Promisimus ”. CIMAGL 70 (1999): 81–228 [includes up to Prisc. gramm. II 6, 23].Google Scholar
Idem
Oxford, Bodleian Library, Laud. Lat. 67 (from Prisc. gramm. II 6, 23.)
Glosule super Priscianum (Gl.)
. Edidit Georgius Arrivabenus de Mantua. Venetiis 1488 (e). (Another copy, Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, nouv. acq. lat 1623 (P).)Google Scholar
John Dacus
(JD). Summa Grammatica Ed. by Alfred Otto. Iohannis Daci Opera (= Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi, 1), 45–220. Hauniae: Societas Linguae et Litterarum Danicarum 1955.Google Scholar
John of Genoa
. Catholicon. Mainz 1460 (Repr., Westmead, Farnborough, Hants: Gregg International 1971.)Google Scholar
Papias
. Ars grammatica. A cura di Roberta Cervani. Bologna: Pàtron 1998.Google Scholar
Peter Helias
(PH). Summa super Priscianum Ed. by Leo Reilly. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies 1993.Google Scholar
Priscian
. Institutionum Grammaticarum Liber I Ed. by Martin Hertz. (= Grammatici Latini, 2.) Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1855 (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1961.) Google Scholar
Pseudo-Kilwardby (Pseudo-Kilw.)
. The Commentary on ‘Priscianus Maior’ Ascribed to Robert Kilward by. Selected texts Ed. by Karin M. Fredborg, N. J. Green-Pedersen, Lauge Nielsen & Jan Pinborg. (= CIMAGL 15.) Copenhagen 1975.Google Scholar
Robert Grosseteste
. De Generatione Sonorum Ed. by Ludwig Baur. Die philosophishen Werke Grossetestes, 7–10 and 646–647. Münster: Aschendorff 1912.Google Scholar
Robert Kilwardby
(Kilw.). Commentary on De Accentibus Ed. by P. Osmund Lewry. “Thirteenth-Century Teaching on Speech and Accentuation: Robert Kilwardby’s Commentary on De Accentibus of Pseudo-Priscian”. Mediaeval Studies 50.96–185 (1988).Google Scholar
Roger Bacon
. The Greek Grammar of Roger Bacon and a Fragment of his Hebrew Grammar Ed. by Edmond Nolan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1902.Google Scholar
Simon
Domifex. Domus Grammaticae Ed. by Alfred Otto. Simonis Daci Opera (= Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi, 3), 1–87. Hauniae: Societas Linguae et Litterarum Danicarum 1963.Google Scholar
Terentius Scaurus
. De Orthographia Ed. by Heinrich Keil. (= Grammatici Latini, 7), 11–35. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1880 (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1961.)Google Scholar
Tractatus de grammatica: Eine fälschlich Robert Grosseteste zugeschriebene spekulative Grammatik (Tract.)
Edition und Kommentar von Karl Reichl. München – Paderborn – Wien: Ferdinand Schöningh 1976.Google Scholar
William of Conches (WCh)
Glose super Priscianum. Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, Lat. 15130 (2nd version).

B.Secondary literature

Baur, Ludwig
1912 See Robert Grosseteste.Google Scholar
Burnett, Charles
1991 “Sound and its Perception in the Middle Ages”. The Second Sense: Studies in hearing and musical judgement from Antiquity to the 17th-century ed. by Charles Burnett, 43–69. London: The Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L.
1971Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cervani, Roberta
1998 See Papias.Google Scholar
Covington, Michael A.
1984Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Rijk, L. M.
1967Logica modernorum II.1. Assen: van Gorcum & Co.Google Scholar
Desbordes, Françoise
1990Idées romaines sur l’écriture. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
Dutton, Paul E. & Anneli Luhtala
1994 “Eriugena in Priscianum”. Mediaeval Studies 56.153–163.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin Margareta
1973 “The Dependence of Petrus Helias’ Summa super Priscianum on William of Conches’ Glose super Priscianum ”. CIMAGL 11.1–57.Google Scholar
1980 “Universal Grammar according to Some 12th-Century Grammarians”. HL 7:1/2.69–84.Google Scholar
1981 “Some Notes on the Grammar of William of Conches”. CIMAGL 37.21–41.Google Scholar
1988 “Speculative Grammar”. A History of 12th-Century Western Philosophy ed. by Peter Dronke, 177–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1990 “The Priscian Commentary from the Second Half of the Twelfth Century: Ms Leiden BPL 154”. HEL 12:2.53–68.Google Scholar
1999 “The Promisimus ”. Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition: Acts of the Symposium of the Copenhagen School of Medieval Philosophy Jan. 10–13, 1996 ed. by Sten Ebbesen & Russell Friedmann, 191–205. Copenhagen: Reitzels.Google Scholar
Gibson, Margaret
1979 “The Early Scholastic Glosule to Priscian, Institutiones Grammaticae: the Text and its Influence”. Studi medievali 3ª série 20.235–254.Google Scholar
1992 “Milestones in the Study of Priscian, circa 800 – circa 1220”. Viator 23.17–33.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even
1990 “ Una et Eadem: Some observations on Roger Bacon’s Greek Grammar”. De Ortu Grammaticae: Studies in mediaeval grammar and linguistic theory in memory of Jan Pinborg ed. by Geoffrey L. Bursill-Hall, Sten Ebbensen & Konrad Koerner, 117–131. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hunt, Richard W.
1943 “Studies on Priscian in the 11th and 12th Centuries. I: Petrus Helias and his predecessors”. Medieval and Renaissance Studies 1:2.194–231. (Repr. in Hunt, The History of Grammar in the Middle Ages ed. by Geoffrey L. Bursill-Hall, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1980.)Google Scholar
1950 “Studies on Priscian in the 12th century. II: The School of Ralph of Beauvais”. Medieval and Renaissance Studies 2:1.1–56 (Repr. in Hunt, The History of Grammar in the Middle Ages ed. by Geoffrey L. Bursill-Hall, 39–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1980.)Google Scholar
Jeauneau, Édouard
1960 “Deux rédactions des Gloses de Guillaume de Conches sur Priscian”. Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale 27.212–247.Google Scholar
Kelly, Louis G.
1974 “Grammar and Meaning in the Late Middle Ages”. HL 1.203–219.Google Scholar
1979 “ Modus Significandi: An interdisciplinary concept”. HL 6:2.159–180.Google Scholar
Knepkeens, C. H.
1987Het Iudicium Constructionis: Het leerstuk van de constructio in de 2de helft van de 12de eeuw. 4 vols. Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien
1997a [1994] “The Study of Grammar under the Carolingians”. Grammar and Grammarians in the Early Middle Ages by V. Law, 129–153. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
1997b [1992] “Carolingian Grammarians and Theoretical Innovation”. Grammar and Grammarians in the Early Middle Ages by V. Law, 154–163. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Luhtala, Anneli
1993 “Syntax and Dialectic in Carolingian Commentaries on Priscian’s Institutiones Grammaticae” . HL 20.145–191.Google Scholar
2000 “Early Medieval Commentary on Priscian’s Institutiones Grammaticae ”. CIMAGL 71.115–188.Google Scholar
Lusignan, Serge
1986Parler vulgairement. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Marmo, Costantino
1994Semiotica e linguaggio nella Scolastica: Parigi, Bologna, Erfurt 1270–1330: La semiotica dei Modisti. Roma: Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medio Evo.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith
1982 “Antonio de Nebrija and the Dawn of Modern Phonetics”. Respublica Litterarum 5.221–232.Google Scholar
1987 “On the Extent of Phonetic Knowledge in the Middle Ages”. Neuere Forschungen zur Wortbildung und Historiographie der Linguistik: Festgabe für Herbert E. Brekle zum 50. Geburtstag ed. by Brigitte Asbach-Schnitker & Johannes Roggenhofer, 271–286. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Pérez Rodríguez, Estrella
1997 “El concepto de littera en Nebrija: Análisis a la luz de la tradición gramatical”. Humanismo y Pervivencia del Mundo Clásico II. Homenaje al Prof. Luis Gil ed. by José Mª Maestre et al., 663–671. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz.Google Scholar
2002a “La doctrina de Prisciano sobre la letra según sus comentaristas del s. XII”. Actas del III Congreso Hispánico de Latín Medieval ed. Maurilio Pérez, 661–670. León: Universidad de León.Google Scholar
2002b “La Reducción de las Letras de Juan Pablo Bonet: ¿de la grafía al sonido?”. Actas del III Congreso Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Historiografía Lingüístic ed. by Miguel Ángel Esparza, Benigno Fernández & Hans-Josef Niederehe, 391–406. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan
1967Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
1982 “Speculative Grammar”. The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy ed. by Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg, 254–269. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reichl, Karl
1976 See Tractatus de grammatica .Google Scholar
Reilly, Leo
1993 See Peter Helias.Google Scholar
Rosier, Irène
1983La grammaire spéculative des Modistes. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
1993 “Le commentaire des Glosulae et des Glosae de Guillaume de Conches sur le chapitre De voce des Institutiones Grammaticae de Priscien”. CIMAGL 63.115–144.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène
1997 “Roger Bacon and Grammar”. Roger Bacon and the Sciences ed. by Jeremiah Hackett, 67–102. Leiden.: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Seeman, Khalil I.
1968Linguistics in the Middle Ages: Phonetic studies in Early Islam. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles
1869Extraits de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l’histoire des doctrines grammaticales au Moyen Âge. Paris: Impr. Nationale. (Repr., Frankfurt am Main: Minerva 1964.)Google Scholar
Wollock, Jeffrey
1997The Noblest Animate Motion: Biology, medicine and speech in pre-Cartesian linguistic thought. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar