Editorial published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 31:1 (2004) ► pp.16
References (15)
References
Hausmann, Frank-Rutger. 2000. ‘Vom Strudel der Ereignisse verschlungen’: Deutsche Romanistik im ‘Dritten Reich’. Frankfurt/M.: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Hutton, Christopher M. 1999. Linguistics and the Third Reich: Race, mother tongue fascism and the science of language. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knobloch, Clemens. 2004a. ‘Volkhafte Sprachforschung’: Studien über den Umbau der Sprachwissenschaft in Deutschland zwischen 1918 und 1945. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2004b. Review of Frank-Rutger Hausmann, Anglistik und Amerikanistik im “Dritten Reich” (Wiesbaden: Vittorio Klostermann, 2003). Historiographia Linguistica 31:1.151–157.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 1999. Linguistic Historiography: Projects & prospects. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. “Ideology in 19th and 20th Century Study of Language: A neglected aspect of linguistic historiography”. Indogermanische Forschungen 1051.1–26.Google Scholar
2001. “Linguistics and Ideology in 19th and 20th Century Studies of Language”. Language & Ideology, vol. I1: Theoretical Cognitive Approaches ed. by René Dirven, Bruce Hawkins & Esra Sandikcioglu, 253–276. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002a. Toward a History of American Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2002b. “Ideology, Politics, Social-Science Scholarship: On the responsibilities of intellectuals”. Lingua Humanitatis 2:2.51–84. Seoul: International Association for Humanistic Studies in Language. (Revised version reissued as Chapter 2 in Koerner 2004b.)Google Scholar
2004a. “Ideology, ‘Resonanzbedarf’, and Linguistic-Philological Scholarship”. Communicating Ideologies: Language, discourse and social practice ed. by Teun van Dijk, JoAnne Neff-van Aertselaer & Martin Pütz, 57–83. Frankfurt/Main & Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2004b. Essays in the History of Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerchenmüller, Joachim. 1997. Keltischer Sprengstoff: Eine wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Studie über die Keltologie von 1900 bis 1945. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Peter. 2003. “Alles bestens? Einige Beobachtungen zur intradisziplinären Wirkung der Historiographie der Sprachwissenschaft”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 131.115–126.Google Scholar
Schreyer, Rüdiger. 2000. “What’s Wrong with the Historiography of Linguistics?”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 101.205–208.Google Scholar
Tuite, Kevin. 2003. “Explorations in the Ideological Infrastructure of Indo-European Studies”. Historiographia Linguistica 30:1/2.205–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar