Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 31:1 (2004) ► pp.3358
References (45)
References
Aarsleff, Hans. 1982. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the study of language and intellectual history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S[idney]. 1953. Phonetics in Ancient India. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anquetil-Duperron, Abraham Hyacinthe. 1808[1784–1793]. “Le Premier fleuve de l’Inde, le Gange, selon les anciens, expliqué par le Gange, selon les modernes”. Mémoires de littérature, tirés des registers de l’Académie Royale des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 491.512–646; Supplément au mémoire qui précède, 647–712. [The Supplément publishes correspondence of Père Coeurdoux with the Académie des Inscriptions of about 1768.]Google Scholar
Bühler, Georg. 1962 [1898]. Indian Palaeography. Calcutta: Firma Mukhopadhyaya.Google Scholar
Bopp, Franz. 1816. Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache. Frankfurt/Main: Andreäische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Breckenridge, Carol A. & Peter van der Veer, eds. 1993. Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Robert. 1856. A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian Family of Languages. London: Harrison.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alexander D. 1816. A Grammar of the Teloogoo Language, commonly termed the Gentoo, peculiar to the Hindoos inhabiting the North Eastern provinces of the Indian Peninsula. Madras: College Press of Fort St. George.Google Scholar
Carey, William. 1814. A Grammar of the Telingana Language. Serampore: Mission Press.Google Scholar
Coeurdoux, Gaston-Laurent, S. J. 1808 [c.1768]. “Réponse au mémoire de M. l’Abbé Barthélemy”. Published in Anquetil-Duperon 1808.647–667.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. 1985. “The Command of Language and the Language of Command”. Subaltern Studies IV: Writings on South Asian history and society ed. by Ranajit Guha, 276–329. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Colebrooke, Henry Thomas. 1801. “On the Sanscrit and Pracrit Languages”. Asiatick Researches 71.199–231.Google Scholar
Droit, Roger-Pol. 1989. L’Oublie de l’Inde: Une amnésie philosphique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna. 1995. The Alphabetic Labyrinth: Letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Du Ponceau, Peter Stephen. 1838. Mémoire sur le système grammatical des langues de quelques nations indiennes de l’Amerique du nord. Paris: A. Pihan de la Forest.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1970 [1966]. Homo hierarchicus. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Ellis, Francis Whyte n.d. The Ellis papers. MS in the Bodleian Library, Oxford.
. 1816. “Note to the Introduction”. Campbell 1816.1–20.Google Scholar
. 1818. Replies to Seventeen Questions Proposed by the Goverment of Fort St. George Relative to Mirasi Right, with two appendices elucidatory of the subject. Madras: Government Gazette Office. (Repr. in Three Treatises on Mirasi Right ed. by C. P. Brown, with remarks made by the Hon’ble the Court of Directors. Madras: D. P. L. C. Connor, 1852.)Google Scholar
Gobineau, Joseph Arthur, comte de. 1853–1855. Essai sur l’inégalité des races humaines. 41 vols. Paris: Firmin Didot Frères.Google Scholar
Gulya, János. 1974. “Some 18th Century Antecedents of Nineteenth Century Linguistics: The discovery of Finno-Ugrian”. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and paradigms ed. by Dell Hymes, 258–276. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Halbfass, Wilhelm. 1988 [1981]. India and Europe: An essay in understanding. Albany, N. Y.: State University of New York Press. [Transl. of Indien und Europa: Perspektiven ihrer geistigen Begegnung.]Google Scholar
Irschick, Eugene F. 1994. Dialogue and History: Constructing South India, 1795–1895. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. c.1782. Notes on the State of Virginia. N.p: n. pub.Google Scholar
Jones, William. 1787 [1786]. “On the Hindus: The third anniversary discourse”. Asiatick researches 11.415–431.Google Scholar
. 1787. “A Dissertation on the Orthography of Asiatick Words in Roman Letters”. Asiatick researches 11.1–56.Google Scholar
. 1799. The works of Sir William Jones. Ed. by Anna Maria Jones. 61 vols. London: G. G. & J. Robinson, and R. H. Evans.Google Scholar
. 1807. The works of Sir William Jones. 131 vols., ed. Anna Maria Jones. London: John Stockdale & John Walker.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Georg. Wilhelm. 1718. “Lebnitii desiderata circa linguas populorum, ad Dn. Podesta, Interpretem Caesareum transmissa”. Otium Hanoverum ed. by Joachim Friederich Feller, 49–54. Leipzig: J. C. Marinus.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Bruce. 1999. Theorizing Myth: Narrative, ideology, and scholarship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marsden, William. 1782 [1781]. “Remarks on the Sumatran Languages, by Mr. Marsden. In a letter to Sir Joseph Banks, Bart. President of the Royal Society”. Archaeologia: or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity. London: Society of Antiquaries.Google Scholar
. 1785. “Observations on the language of the people commonly called Gypsies. In a letter to Sir Joseph Banks, Bart. F. R. S. From Mr. Marsden, F. R. S.”. Archaeologia 71.383–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1834. Miscellaneous works of William Marsden, F. R. S. London: Published for the Author by Parbury, Allen & Co.Google Scholar
Müller, F[riedrich] Max. 1855 [1854]. The Languages of the Seat of War in the East, with a survey of the three families of language, Semitic, Arian, and Turanian. 2nd ed. London: Williams and Norgate. [Original title: Suggestions for the assistance of officers in learning the languages of the seat of war in the East.]Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, J. Robert. 1947. “Physics in the Contemporary World: Speech delivered at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology”. Cited in John Bartlett, Familiar Quotations p. 1055. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Pallas, Peter Simon, ed. 1786–1789. Linguarum totius orbis vocabularia comparativa. 21 vols. St. Petersburg: Carl Schnoor.Google Scholar
Prichard, John Cowles. 1973 [1813]. Researches into the Physical History of Man. Repr. With an Introduction by George W. Stocking, Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Stepan, Nancy. 1982. The Idea of Race in Science: Great Britain 1800–1960. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Isaac. c.1889. The Origin of the Aryan: An account of the prehistoric ethnology and civilisation of Europe. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
Tooker, Elisabeth. 2002. “Classifying North American Indian languages before 1850”. Anthropology, History, and American Indians: Essays in honor of William Curtis Sturtevant ed. William L. Merrill & Ives Goddard (= Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, 44), 173–178. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 1981. Dravidian Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992. “The Revolution in Ethnological Time: The Marett Memorial Lecture 1991”. Man n.s. 271.379–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. Aryans and British India. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Indian ed., New Delhi: Vistaar Publications/Sage.)Google Scholar
1999. “Hullabaloo about Telugu”. South Asia Research 19.1.53–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Asher, R. E.
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.