Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 31:1 (2004) ► pp.105–136

Leonard Bloomfield

Linguistics and mathematics

| Downing College, Cambridge

This paper considers various aspects of Leonard Bloomfield’s (1887–1949) interest in contemporaneous mathematics. Specifically, some of the sources from which he obtained his mathematical knowledge are discussed, as are his own proposals for a linguistics-based solution to the foundations crisis which preoccupied leading mathematicians during the first half of the 20th century. In addition, his attitude towards the role of meaning in linguistic theory is reassessed in the light of his knowledge of Hilbertian Formalism.

Published online: 30 July 2004
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.31.1.06tom
References
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
1953 “On Recursive Definitions in Empirical Science”. Eleventh International Congress of Philosophy, vol. V1, 160–165. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1964 Language and Information: Selected essays on their theory and application. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Belyi, Vilen V[iktorovič]
1967 “Some Facts about Weiss’ Influence on Bloomfield”. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 151.409–412. (Repr. in Fought 1999, ed. II1, 115–118.)Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1926 “A Set of Postulates for the Science of Language”. Language 21.153–164. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.128–140.) DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1933 Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
1935 “Linguistic Aspects of Science”. Philosophy of Science 21.499–517. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.307–321.) DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1936 “Language or Ideas?”. Language 121.89–95. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.322–328.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1939 “Linguistic Aspects of Science”. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 1:1/5.258–301. (Also published separately, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, iv1, 1–59 pp.)Google Scholar
1943 “Meaning”. Monatshefte für deutschen Unterricht 351.101–106. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.400–405.)Google Scholar
1970 [1937] The Language of Science. An unpublished manuscript, fragments of which are collected in Bloomfield 1970.333–338.Google Scholar
1970 A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Ed. by Charles F. Hockett. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf
1928 Der logische Aufbau der Welt: Versuch einer Konstitutionstheorie der Begriffe. Berlin: Welt-Kreis.Google Scholar
1934 Logische Syntax der Sprache. Vienna: Julius Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1937 [1934] The Logical Syntax of Language. Transl. by Atheme Smeaton. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
1967 [1928] The Logical Structure of the World: Pseudoproblems in philosophy. Transl. by R. A. George. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Church, Alonzo
1944 Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Vol. I1. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Copi, Irving, M.
1971 The Theory of Logical Types. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Detlefsen, Michael
1993 “Hilbert’s Formalism”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 471.285–304.Google Scholar
Ewald, William B.
1996 From Kant to Hilbert: A source book in the foundations of mathematics. 21 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fought, John G.
1999 “Leonard Bloomfield’s Linguistic Legacy: Later uses of some technical features”. Historiographia Linguistica 261.313–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ed. 1999 Leonard Bloomfield: Critical assessments. 31 vols. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael
1999 Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fries, Charles C.
1954 “Meaning and Linguistic Analysis”. Language 301.57–68. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grattan-Guinness, Ivor
2000 The Search for Mathematical Roots, 1870–1940: Logics, set theories and the foundations of mathematics from Cantor through Russell to Gödel. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grelling, Kurt
1936 “The Logical Paradoxes”. Mind 451.481–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1991 The Theory of Language and Information. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harwood, F. W.
1955 “Axiomatic Syntax: The construction and evaluation of syntactic calculus”. Language 311.409–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heijenoort, Jean van
ed. 1967 From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hilbert, David
1899 Grundlagen der Geometrie. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
1900 “Über den Zahlbegriff”. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 81.180–184.Google Scholar
1918 “Axiomatisches Denken”. Mathematische Annalen 781.405–415. (Repr. in Hilbert, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, vol. III1, 146–156. Berlin: Springer 1970.)Google Scholar
1925 “Über das Unendliche” Mathematische Annalen 951.161–190. [English transl. by S. Bauer-Mengelberg in Heijenoort 1967.367–392.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967 [1904] “On the Foundations of Logic and Arithmetic”. Transl. by B. Woodward in van Heijenoort 1967.130–138.Google Scholar
1967 [1927] “The Foundations of Mathematics”. Transl. by S. Bauer-Mengelberg and D. Føllesdal, in Heijenoort 1967 464–479.Google Scholar
1998 [1922] “The New Grounding of Mathematics”. Transl. by W. Ewald in Mancosu 1998.198–214.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko ed
1995 From Dedekind to Gödel: Essays on the development of the foundations of mathematics. London & New York: Kluwer Academic Publisher. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiż, Henry & Pierre Swiggers
1990 “Bloomfield, the Logical Positivist”. Semiotica 791.257–270. (Repr. in Fought, ed. 1999 II1, 224–236.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
ed. 1970 See Bloomfield 1970.Google Scholar
Kleene, Stephen
1952 Introduction to Metamathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kline, Morris
1980 Mathematics: The loss of certainty. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K[onrad]
2002 Towards a History of American Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kreisel, Georg
1958 “Hilbert’s Programme”. Dialectica 121.346–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luschei, Eugene C.
1962 The Logical Systems of Lésniewski. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo
1998 From Brouwer to Hilbert: The debate on the foundations of mathematics in the 1920s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.
1993 Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1994 Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O.
1985 The Time of My Life: An autobiography. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Constance
1996 Hilbert. New York – Heidelberg – Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Alan W.
1998 Carnap’s Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the emergence of logical positivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert H.
1988 “Leonard Bloomfield: The man and the man of science”. Transactions of the Philological Society 86:1.63–87. (Repr. in Fought, ed. 1999 I1, 231–250.) DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
1903 Principles of Mathematics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Tomalin, Marcus
2002 “The Formal Origins of Syntactic Theory”. Lingua 1121.805–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 The Mathematical Origins of Transformational Generative Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weiss, Albert P.
1925 “One Set of Postulates for a Behaviourist Psychology”. Psychological Review 321.83–87. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred N. & Bertrand Russell
1925 [1910] Principia Mathematica. 2nd ed. 31 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, John W.
1911 Fundamental Concepts of Algebra and Geometry. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Young, John W. & Oswald Veblen
1918 Projective Geometry. Boston: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Passos, Maria de Lourdes R. da F. & Maria Amelia Matos
2007. The influence of Bloomfield’s linguistics on Skinner. The Behavior Analyst 30:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.