Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 31:1 (2004) ► pp.105136
References (57)
References
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1953. “On Recursive Definitions in Empirical Science”. Eleventh International Congress of Philosophy, vol. V1, 160–165. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
. 1964. Language and Information: Selected essays on their theory and application. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Belyi, Vilen V[iktorovič]. 1967. “Some Facts about Weiss’ Influence on Bloomfield”. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 151.409–412. (Repr. in Fought 1999, ed. II1, 115–118.)Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1926. “A Set of Postulates for the Science of Language”. Language 21.153–164. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.128–140.) DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
. 1935. “Linguistic Aspects of Science”. Philosophy of Science 21.499–517. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.307–321.) DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1936. “Language or Ideas?”. Language 121.89–95. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.322–328.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1939. “Linguistic Aspects of Science”. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 1:1/5.258–301. (Also published separately, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, iv1, 1–59 pp.)Google Scholar
. 1943. “Meaning”. Monatshefte für deutschen Unterricht 351.101–106. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.400–405.)Google Scholar
. 1970 [1937]. The Language of Science. An unpublished manuscript, fragments of which are collected in Bloomfield 1970.333–338.Google Scholar
. 1970. A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Ed. by Charles F. Hockett. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1928. Der logische Aufbau der Welt: Versuch einer Konstitutionstheorie der Begriffe. Berlin: Welt-Kreis.Google Scholar
. 1934. Logische Syntax der Sprache. Vienna: Julius Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1937 [1934]. The Logical Syntax of Language. Transl. by Atheme Smeaton. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
. 1967 [1928]. The Logical Structure of the World: Pseudoproblems in philosophy. Transl. by R. A. George. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Church, Alonzo. 1944. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Vol. I1. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Copi, Irving, M. 1971. The Theory of Logical Types. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Detlefsen, Michael. 1993. “Hilbert’s Formalism”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 471.285–304.Google Scholar
Ewald, William B. 1996. From Kant to Hilbert: A source book in the foundations of mathematics. 21 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fought, John G. 1999. “Leonard Bloomfield’s Linguistic Legacy: Later uses of some technical features”. Historiographia Linguistica 261.313–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1999. Leonard Bloomfield: Critical assessments. 31 vols. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1999. Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fries, Charles C. 1954. “Meaning and Linguistic Analysis”. Language 301.57–68. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. 2000. The Search for Mathematical Roots, 1870–1940: Logics, set theories and the foundations of mathematics from Cantor through Russell to Gödel. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grelling, Kurt. 1936. “The Logical Paradoxes”. Mind 451.481–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. 1991. The Theory of Language and Information. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harwood, F. W. 1955. “Axiomatic Syntax: The construction and evaluation of syntactic calculus”. Language 311.409–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heijenoort, Jean van, ed. 1967. From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hilbert, David. 1899. Grundlagen der Geometrie. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
. 1900. “Über den Zahlbegriff”. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 81.180–184.Google Scholar
. 1918. “Axiomatisches Denken”. Mathematische Annalen 781.405–415. (Repr. in Hilbert, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, vol. III1, 146–156. Berlin: Springer, 1970.)Google Scholar
. 1925. “Über das UnendlicheMathematische Annalen 951.161–190. [English transl. by S. Bauer-Mengelberg in Heijenoort 1967.367–392.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1967 [1904]. “On the Foundations of Logic and Arithmetic”. Transl. by B. Woodward in van Heijenoort 1967.130–138.Google Scholar
. 1967 [1927]. “The Foundations of Mathematics”. Transl. by S. Bauer-Mengelberg and D. Føllesdal, in Heijenoort 1967. 464–479.Google Scholar
. 1998 [1922]. “The New Grounding of Mathematics”. Transl. by W. Ewald in Mancosu 1998.198–214.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko ed. 1995. From Dedekind to Gödel: Essays on the development of the foundations of mathematics. London & New York: Kluwer Academic Publisher. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiż, Henry & Pierre Swiggers. 1990. “Bloomfield, the Logical Positivist”. Semiotica 791.257–270. (Repr. in Fought, ed. 1999 II1, 224–236.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F., ed. 1970. See Bloomfield 1970.Google Scholar
Kleene, Stephen. 1952. Introduction to Metamathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kline, Morris. 1980. Mathematics: The loss of certainty. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K[onrad]. 2002. Towards a History of American Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kreisel, Georg. 1958. “Hilbert’s Programme”. Dialectica 121.346–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luschei, Eugene C. 1962. The Logical Systems of Lésniewski. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo. 1998. From Brouwer to Hilbert: The debate on the foundations of mathematics in the 1920s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1993. Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. 1994. Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. 1985. The Time of My Life: An autobiography. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Constance. 1996. Hilbert. New York – Heidelberg – Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Alan W. 1998. Carnap’s Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the emergence of logical positivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert H. 1988. “Leonard Bloomfield: The man and the man of science”. Transactions of the Philological Society 86:1.63–87. (Repr. in Fought, ed. 1999 I1, 231–250.) DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1903. Principles of Mathematics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Tomalin, Marcus. 2002. “The Formal Origins of Syntactic Theory”. Lingua 1121.805–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The Mathematical Origins of Transformational Generative Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weiss, Albert P. 1925. “One Set of Postulates for a Behaviourist Psychology”. Psychological Review 321.83–87. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred N. & Bertrand Russell. 1925 [1910]. Principia Mathematica. 2nd ed. 31 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, John W. 1911. Fundamental Concepts of Algebra and Geometry. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Young, John W. & Oswald Veblen. 1918. Projective Geometry. Boston: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Passos, Maria de Lourdes R. da F. & Maria Amelia Matos
2007. The influence of Bloomfield’s linguistics on Skinner. The Behavior Analyst 30:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.