Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 34:1 (2007) ► pp. 118
References
Alston, R[obin] C[arfrae]
1965A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Vol. I1: English Grammars Written in English. Leeds: E. J. Arnold & Son.Google Scholar
Alston, R. C.
1974English Linguistics 1500–1800. London: The Scolar Press.Google Scholar
1994Books with Manuscript: A short title catalogue of books with manuscript notes in the British Library. London: British Library.Google Scholar
Baker, Frank
ed. 1980The Works of John Wesley. Vol. XXV1: Letters I1. 1721–1739. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Balderston, Katharine C.
1951Thraliana: The diary of Mrs. Hester Lynch Thrale (Later Mrs. Piozzi) 1776–1809. 21 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, R[obert] W[illiam]
1945 “The Formal Parts of Johnson’s Letters”. Essays on the Eighteenth Century presented to David Nichol Smith in honour of his seventieth birthday ed. by James Sutherland & Frank Percy Wilson, 147–154. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
DNB: Dictionary of National Biography
1885–1900. London: Smith, Elder & Co.
ECCO: Eighteenth Century Collections Online
Thomson Gale.
Ferguson, Richard S.
1889Diocesan Histories: Carlisle. London: SPCK. (http://​www​.stevebulman​.f9​.co​.uk​/cumbria​/diocese​_ferguson12​_f​.html, consulted on 11 Feb. 2006.)
Fletcher, Edward G.
ed. 1963The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. By James Boswell, ESQ. With marginal comments and markings from two copies annotated by Hester Lynch Thrale Piozzi. Vol. I1. New York: Heritage Press.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Larisa Oldireva
2002a “Preterite and Past Participle Forms in English 1680–1790”. Standardisation Processes in Public and Private Writing. (= Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia, 120.) Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
2002b “Variation in Usage and Grammars: The past participle forms of write in English 1680–1790”. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 2 (http://​www​.leidenuniv​.nl​/hsl​_shl​/Contents,Articles).
Hepworth, Brian
1978Robert Lowth. Boston: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1995Women, Men, and Politeness. New York & London: Longman.Google Scholar
Jackson, Heather J.
2001Marginalia: Readers writing in books. New Haven, Ct. & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
ed. 2003A Book I Value: Selected marginalia by Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
2005Romantic Readers: The evidence of marginalia. New Haven, Ct. & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jacox, Francis
1972 [1872]Aspects of Authorship: Or book marks and book makers. Freeport, N.Y.: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, S[terling] A[ndrus]
1929The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage, 1700–1800. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin (Repr., New York: Russell & Russell 1962.)Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert
1762A Short Introduction to English Grammar; with critical notes. London: J. Hughs for A. Millar, and for R. and J. Dodsley. (Facs.-repr. with a notice by Robin C. Alston, Menston: The Scolar Press 1968.)Google Scholar
1763A Short Introduction to English Grammar; with critical notes. The second edition, corrected. London: A. Millar, and R. and J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
1764A Short Introduction to English Grammar; with critical notes. A new edition, corrected. London: A. Millar, and R. and J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Mann, Charles W., Jr.
1994 “The Williamscote Library at Penn State: An 18th-century survival”. Paper delivered for the meetings of the East-Central American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies held at Penn State. October 1994. (http://​www​.libraries​.psu​.edu​/specolls​/rbm​/collections​/MannLoveday​.htm, consulted on 11 Feb. 2006.)
Michael, Ian
1987The Teaching of English, from the sixteenth century to 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagashima, Daisuke
1968 “Mutual Debt between Johnson and Lowth: A contribution to the history of English grammar”. Studies in English Literature (Japan) 441.221–232.Google Scholar
Navest, Karlijn
2003 “Epistolary Formulas in Queeney Thrale’s Letters”. MA thesis, English Department, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
2006 “An Index of Names to Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762), (1763), (1764)”. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 61 (http://​www​.let​.leidenuniv​.nl​/hsl​_shl​/Contents,Articles).
Nichol, Donald W.
ed. 1992Pope’s Literary Legacy: The book-trade correspondence of William Warburton and John Knapton with other letters and documents 1744–1780. Oxford: Oxford Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
OCEL: The Oxford Companion to the English Language
1992 Ed. by Tom McArthur. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OED: The Oxford English Dictionary
Online edition: www​.oed​.com
ODNB: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
2004 Ed. by H. C. G. Matthew & Brian Harrison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Percy, Carol
1997 “Paradigms Lost: Bishop Lowth and the ‘Poetic Dialect’ in his English grammar”. Neophilologus 811.129–144.Google Scholar
Reddick, Allen
1990The Making of Johnson’s Dictionary 1746–1773. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Redford, Bruce
1986The Converse of the Pen: Acts of intimacy in the eighteenth-century familiar letter. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reibel, David
1995 “Introduction” to Robert Lowth, A Short Introduction to English Grammar, v–xxxii. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press. [Reprint of the 2nd, corrected ed. of 1763.]Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
1997 “Lowth’s Corpus of Prescriptivism”. To Explain the Present. Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen ed. by Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, 451–463. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
2000 “Normative Studies in England”. History of the Language Sciences/Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften/Histoire des Sciences du Langage ed. by Sylvain Aroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh, vol. I1, 876–887. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001 “Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762) reprinted”. Publishing History 491.5–17.Google Scholar
2002 “Robert Lowth and the Strong Verb System”. Language Sciences 241.459–469.Google Scholar
2003a “Lowth’s Language”. Insights into Late Modern English ed. by Marina Dossena & Charles Jones, 241–264. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2003b “ ‘Tom’s Grammar’: The genesis of Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar revisited”. The Teaching of English in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: Essays for Ian Michael on his 88th birthday ed. by Frances Austin & Chris Stray (= Special issue of Paradigm 2:7), 36–45.Google Scholar
2006a “Eighteenth-Century Prescriptivism and the Norm of Correctness”. The Handbook of the History of English ed. by Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los, 539–557. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006b.“James Merrick: Poet, scholar, and linguist?Historiographia Linguistica 33:1/2.39–56.Google Scholar
Tierney, James E.
ed. 1988The Correspondence of Robert Dodsley 1733–1764. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
The Williamscote Library at Penn State
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Day, Geoffrey & Suzanne Foster
2012. Lowth Holdings in Winchester College. Historiographia Linguistica 39:1  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Percy, Carol
2012. Robert Lowth and the Critics. Historiographia Linguistica 39:1  pp. 9 ff. Crossref logo
TIEKEN-BOON VAN OSTADE, INGRID
2012. Late Modern English in a Dutch context. English Language and Linguistics 16:2  pp. 301 ff. Crossref logo
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
2012. Robert Lowth as a Codifier of the English Language. Historiographia Linguistica 39:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
2014.  In Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900 [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 3],  pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.