Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 34:2/3 (2007) ► pp. 189–212

Shelf life and time horizons in the historiography of linguistics

| Jesus College, Oxford
The aim of this paper is to outline an approach to linguistic historiography which is informed by 20th-century phenomenology and hermeneutics, but which is formulated in linguistic terms. The key concept is that of the ‘time horizons’ which delimit the context which is relevant to the interpretation of an event or text. The idea of the time horizon is here illustrated by the everyday notion of the shelf-life of consumable items. The main thrust of the argument is that the interpretation of historical events and texts necessarily involves not one but two cognitive contexts, that of the historical protagonist and that of the modern observer. The approach sets up a three-level contrast between chronography (getting the facts right), reconstruction (recounting the historical story), and interpretation (making sense of the past story in terms of present-day understandings).
Published online: 13 November 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.34.2.02cra
References
Adam, Barbara
1990 Time and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Amsler, Mark
1989 Etymology and Grammatical Discourse in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Augustine of Hippo
1961 Confessions. Translated with an Introduction by R. S. Pine-Coffin. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Baker, Mona
2006 “Contextualization in Translator- and Interpreter-Mediated Events”. Journal of Pragmatics 381.321–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bal, Mieke
1985 Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Andrew
2003 “Interpreter of Myths: A profile of Roy Foster”. The Guardian, Saturday Review 13 September 2003, p. 20.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian & George Yule
1983 Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934 Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer. [An abridged English translation of Part 2, “Das Zeigfeld der Sprache und die Zeigwörter”, can be found in Jarvella & Klein (1982: 9–30).]Google Scholar
Burke, Peter
2004 What is Cultural History? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter & R. Po-chia Hsia
2007 Cultural Translation in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Cecil Delisle
1933a “The Sense of the Horizon”. Philosophy 311.301–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1933b The Horizon of Experience: A study of the modern mind. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert
1965 [1931] The Whig Interpretation of History. New York & London: W. W. Norton. [Original publication: London: G. Bell & Sons 1931.]Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn
1996 “Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed?” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 81.61–88. LondonGoogle Scholar
Clay, Edmund R.
1882 The Alternative: A study in psychology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Coveney, Peter & Roger Highfield
1990 The Arrow of Time: A voyage through science to solve time’s greatest mystery. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Cram, David
2003 “De gustibus metahistoriographicis”. Später Mittag: Vermischte Anmerkungen zur Metahistoriographie: Festgabe für Peter Schmitter zum. 60 Geburtstag ed. by Klaus D. Dutz, 11–22. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
2005 “On Wild Etymology and Descriptive Profligacy: A contrastive case study”. A Companion in Linguistics: A Festschrift for Anders Ahlqvist on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday ed. by Bernadette Smelik et al., 219–230. Nijmegen: Stichting Uitgeverij de Keltische Draak.Google Scholar
Cram, David & Jaap Maat
2001 George Dalgarno on Universal Language: An edition and translation of Ars Signorum (1661) together with an edition of his unpublished papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Allen
1977 “The Pragmatics of Lexical Specificity”. Journal of Linguistics 131.153–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dainton, Barry
2000 Stream of Consciousness: Unity and continuity in conscious experience. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, Anna Morpurgo
1983 “Mycenean and Greek Prepositions: o-pi, e-pi etc”. Res Mycenaeae: Akten des VII. Internationalen Mykenologischen Colloquiums in Nürnberg 1981 ed. by Alfred Heubeck & Günter Neumann, 287–310. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Dutz, Klaus
1988 Theorie und Praxis: Formen und Aufgaben einer semiotischen Geschichtsschreibung. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
1990 “Methodologische Probleme in der Rekonstruktion sprachwissenschaftlichen Wissens: Geschichte und Geschichten”. Understanding the Historiography of Linguistics: Problems and projects ed. by Werner Hüllen, 49–60. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
2003 Mouse or Rat? Translation as negotiation. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Fischer, David Hackett
1971 Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a logic of historical thought. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Fraser, Julius T.
ed. 1968 The Voices of Time: A cooperative survey of man’s views of time as expressed by the sciences and the humanities. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans Georg
1989 Truth and Method. 2nd revised ed. translated by Joel Weinsheimer & Donald G. Marshall. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg
2004 A Century of Philosophy: A conversation with Riccardo Dottori. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard Milton
1968 The Language of Time. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard
1980 Narrative Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. [Translation of Discours du récit (Paris: Éditions du Seuil 1972).]Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2005 Context as Other Minds: The pragmatics of sociality cognition, and communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, Georgia M.
1989 Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August
2000 [1 1991] Translation and Relevance: Cognition and context. 2nd ed. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Hartley, L[eslie] P[oles]
1953 The Go-Between. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin
1962 Being and Time. Translated by John MacQuarrie & Edward Robinson. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
House, Juliane
2006 “Text and Context in Translation”. Journal of Pragmatics 381.338–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hüllen, Werner
2005 “On the Method of Linguistic Historiography”. Flores grammaticae: Essays in memory of Vivien Law ed. by Nicola McLelland & Andrew R. Linn, 9–19. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund
1962 Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersdemester 1925. Herausgegeben von Walter Biemel. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
1977 Phenomenological Psychology: Lectures, Summer Semester 1925. Transl. by John Scanlon. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan
2006 Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa
1991 Universal History of Linguistics. India, China, Arabia, Europe. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, William
1890 The Principles of Psychology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jarvella, Robert J. & Wolfgang Klein
eds. 1982 Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in deixis and related topics. Chichester & New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna
1996 “Reported Speech, Vehicles of Thought, and the Horizon”. Lingua e Stile 311.113–133.Google Scholar
2002 Semantics and Pragmatics: Meaning in language and discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Kelly, Louis G.
1979 The True Interpreter: A history of translation theory and practice in the west. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kelly, Sean Dorrance
2005 “Temporal Awareness”. Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind ed. by David W. Smith & Amie L. Thomasson, 221–234. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K[onrad]
1989 Practising Linguistic Methodology: Selected essays. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
2004 Essays in the History of Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.
1962 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. (2nd ed. 1970.)Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnston
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langer, Susanne K.
1942 Philosophy in a New Key. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, James
1937 Taste and Fashion from the French Revolution until Today. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
1969 Modesty in Dress: An inquiry into the fundamentals of fashion. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien
2002 The History of Linguistics in Europe From Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Presumptive Meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, Mass. & London: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linn, Andrew
2001 “Professor Storm’s Diary: Historical fact – historiographical fiction”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 111.193–219.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David
1985 The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1982 “Deixis and Subjectivity: Loquor ergo sum?”. Jarvella & Klein, eds. 1982.101–124.Google Scholar
Mabbott, John D.
1951 “Our Direct Experience of Time”. Mind 601.153–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McTaggart, John McT. E.
1908 “The Unreality of Time”. Mind 171.456–473.Google Scholar
Mundle, Clement W. K.
1954 “How Specious is the ‘Specious Present’?”. Mind 631.26–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
2001 Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Palm, Jonas
1969 “Lag die Zukunft der Griechen hinter ihnen?”. Annales Academiæ Regiæ Scientiarum Upsaliensis 131.5–13.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith
1976 “The Applicability of Kuhn’s Paradigms to the History of Linguistics”. Language 521.285–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Misja S., M. van Gool & E. Messing
1992 A Bibliography on Space, Deixis, and Related Topics. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Puech, Christian
2000 “L’esprit de Saussure: Paris contre Genève. L’héritage saussurien”. Modèles linguistiques 201.79–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Saussurisme et structuralisme français dans le contexte européen”. The Cambridge Companion to Saussure ed. by Carol Sanders, 124–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
2005 “Literalism and Contextiualism: Some varieties”. Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, meaning and truth ed. by Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter, 171–196. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Matheson
2006 Husserl: A guide for the perplexed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1983 [1916] Course in General Linguistics. Translated and annotated by Roy Harris. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich
1834 [1813] “Über die verschiedenen Methoden des Übersetzens”. Sämtliche Werke, vol. III, Abt. II, 207–245. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Philip
1977 “Newsmen and their Time-Machine”. British Journal of Sociology 81.336–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987 Putting ‘Reality’ Together: BBC News. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Peter
1982 Untersuchungen zur Historiographie der Linguistik: Struktur, Methodik, theoretische Fundierung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
1986 “Fortschritt: Zu einer umstrittenen Interpretationskategorie in der Geschichtsschreibung der Linguistik und der Semiotik”. Geschichte und Geschichtsschreibung der Semiotik: Fallstudien ed. by Klaus Dutz & Peter Schmitter, 39–73. Münster: MAKs Publikationen.Google Scholar
1994 “Narrativity as a Metahistorical Term: Some systematic and historical considerations”. Perspectives on English: Studies in honour of Professor Emma Vorlat ed. by Keith Carlon, Kristin Davidse & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, 140–157. Leuven & Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
2003 Historiographie und Narration: Metahistoriographische Aspekte der Wissenschaftsgeschichtsschreibung der Linguistik. Seoul: Sowadalmedia; Tübingen: Gunter Narr (in Kommission).Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael
1986 “Deadlines, Datelines, and History”. Reading the News ed. by Robert K. Manoff & Michael Schudson, 79–108. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin
1969 “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”. History and Theory 81.3–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1986 “Loose Talk”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 61.153–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 [1 1986] Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stamenov, Maxim I.
2003 “Language and Self-Consciousness: Modes of self-presentation in language structure”. The Self in Neuroscience and Psychiatry ed. by Tilo Kircher & Anthony S. David, 76–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanz, Christian
1980 Studies in the Acquisition of Deictic Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R.
1995 [1 1989] Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James
ed. 1988 Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael
1979 Rubbish Theory: The creation and destruction of value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid
1996 An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence
1995 The Translator’s Invisibility: History of translation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
West, Michael
1953 A General Service List of English Words, with Semantic Frequencies. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Whitrow, Gerald James
1980 [1 1961] The Natural History of Time. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1989 Time in History: Views of time from prehistory to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2004 “Relevance and Lexical Pragmatics”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 161.343–360. London.Google Scholar
Young, Michael
1988 The Metronomic Society: Natural rhythms and human timetables. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Joseph, John E.
2020. The agency of habitus: Bourdieu and language at the conjunction of Marxism, phenomenology and structuralism. Language & Communication 71 ► pp. 108 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.