Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 37:1/2 (2010) ► pp.31–73

Imaginative Science

The interactions of Henry Sweet’s linguistic thought and E. B. Tylor’s anthropology

| Regents Park College, Oxford
This article traces the interactions between the philologist and applied linguist Henry Sweet (1845–1912) and the anthropologist and evolutionist E. B. Tylor (1832–1917). Tylor was impressed by Sweet’s uniformitarian views on phonetic synthesis and word-division: that phonetic and grammatical processes observable in the present could be used to explain grammatical formation and inflection in the past. Conversely, Sweet’s views on language and its origins owe much to Tylor’s intellectualism and his doctrine of survivals. According to Tylor, ‘primitive man’ employed rational thought in his attempts to make intellectual sense of the world and its phenomena. In expressions such as ‘the sun rises’, vestiges of this primitive thought and animism then survive in the lexis and syntax of later, modern languages. Sweet used Tylorian material in his language textbooks, and the intellectualist theory was taken up by literary critics in the 1880s, e.g., in the Shelley Society — of which Sweet was a founding member, in order to explore the roots of poetic metaphor and figurative language as used in modern English poetry.
Published online: 21 May 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.37.1-2.02ath
References (117)
References
Ackerman, Robert. 1987. J. G. Frazer: His life and work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Stephen G. 1999. Darwinism and the Linguistic Image: Language, race, and natural theology in the nineteenth century. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Andresen, Julie Tetel. 1990. Linguistics in America 1769–1924: A critical history. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Asher, R. E. & Eugenie J. A. Henderson, eds. 1981. Towards a History of Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Atherton, Mark. 1996a. “Being Scientific and Relevant in the Language Textbook: Henry Sweet’s primers for the study of colloquial English”. Paradigm 201.1–20.Google Scholar
. 1996b. “Henry Sweet’s Psychology of Language Learning”. Theorie und Rekonstruction ed. by Klaus D. Dutz & Hans-J. Niederehe, 149–168. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
. 2008. “‘To observe things as they are without regard to their origin’: Henry Sweet’s general writings on language in the 1870s”. Bulletin of the Henry Sweet Society 511.41–58.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Priming the Poets: The making of Henry Sweet’s Anglo-Saxon Reader ”. Anglo-Saxon Culture and the Modern Imagination ed. by David Clark & Nicholas Perkins, 000–000. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
Augstein, Hannah Franziska. 1999. James Cowles Prichard’s Anthropology: Remaking the science of man in early nineteenth-century Britain. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Alexander Melville. 1867. Visible Speech: The science of universal alphabetics; or self-interpreting physiological letters, for the writing of all languages in one alphabet. London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co., and London & New York: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Benzie, W. 1983. Dr F. J. Furnivall: Victorian scholar adventurer. Norman, Okla.: Pilgrim Books.Google Scholar
Bodelsen, Carl Adolf. 1960. Studies in Mid-Victorian Imperialism. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Brandl, Alois. “Henry Sweet”. 1913. Archiv für das Studium der Neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 1301.8–11.Google Scholar
Brooke, Stopford A. 1876. English Literature. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1886. Inaugural Address to the Shelley Society. 10 March 1886 at University College, London. London: Shelley Society.Google Scholar
1892. The History of Early English Literature: Being the history of English poetry from its beginnings to the accession of King Alfred. 21 vols. London & New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dorson, Richard M. 1968. The British Folklorists: A history. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elffers, Els. 1999. “Psychological Linguistics”. Sprachtheorien der Neuzeit I: Der epistemologische Kontext neuzeitlicher Sprachund Grammatiktheorien ed. by Peter Schmitter, 301–341. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Ellis, Alexander J. 1869a. On Early English Pronunciation. Part I. On the pronunciation of the XIVth, XVIth, XVIIth, and XVIIIth Centuries. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
1869b. On Early English Pronunciation. Part II: On the pronunciation of the XIIIth and previous centuries, of Anglo-Saxon, Icelandic, Old Norse and Gothic, with chronological tables of the value of letters and expressions of sound in English writing. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
1871. On Early English Pronunciation. Part III: Illustrations of the pronunciation of the XIVth and XVIth centuries. Chaucer, Gower, Wycliffe, Spenser, Shakspere, Salesbur, Barcley, Hart Bullokar, Gill. Pronouncing vocabulary. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland & Finn Sivert Nielsen. 2001. A History of Anthropology. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1946. “The English School of Phonetics”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1946.92–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furnivall, Frederick J. 1867. “Education in Early Times in England”. Quarterly Journal of Education and Scholastic Advertiser, vol. I, no. 2, 47–56 (August 1867) and no. 3, 97–110 (November 1867).Google Scholar
Gneuss, Helmut. 1996. English Language Scholarship: A survey and bibliography from the beginnings to the end of the nineteenth century. Binghamton, N.Y.: Centre for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Gross, John. 1969. The Rise and Fall of the Man of Letters. Aspects of English literary life since 1800. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Harrison, W. J., revisor. 2004. “Christy, Henry (1810–1865)”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Online ed., 2010. Original entry by A. Bowdouin Van Riper.]Google Scholar
Henson, Hilary. 1971. “Early British Anthropologists and Language”. Social Anthropology and Language ed. by Edwin Ardener, 3–32. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howatt, A. P. R. 2004 [1984]. A History of English Language Teaching. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1870. Lay Sermons, Addresses and Reviews. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 1877. Physiography: An introduction to the study of nature. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jacks, Lawrence Pearsall. 1917. Life and Letters of Stopford Brooke. 21 vols. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1966. “Henry Sweet’s Paths Towards Phonemics”. In Memory of J. R. Firth ed. by C. E. Bazell, J. C. Catford, M. A. K. Halliday & R. H. Robins, 242–254. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Jankowsky, Kurt. 1999. “Sound Physiology in the Making: On the role of Henry Sweet (1845– 1912) and Eduard Sievers (1850–1932) in the development of linguistic science”. The Emergence of the Modern Language Sciences. Studies on the transition from historical-comparative to structural linguistics in honour of E. F. K. Koerner. Vol. I: Historiographical perspectives ed. by Sheila Embleton, John E. Joseph & Hans-Josef Niederehe, 77–91. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1904. How to Teach a Foreign Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Keesing, Roger M. & Andrew J. Strathern. 1998. Cultural Anthropology: A contemporary perspective. 3rd ed. Fort Worth, Tex.: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Kelly, John & John Local. 1985. “The Modernity of Henry Sweet”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 101.209–216.Google Scholar
Kent, Christopher A. 1989. “Victorian Periodicals and the Construing of Victorian Reality”. Victorian Periodicals: A guide to research ed. by J. Don Vann & Rosemary T. van Arsdel, 1–12. New York: Modern Languages Association.Google Scholar
Klinghardt, Hermann. 1888. Ein Jahr Erfahrungen mit der neuen Methode [A year of experiences with the new method]. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Knoepflmacher, U. C. & G. B. Tennyson, eds. 1977. Nature and the Victorian Imagination. Berkeley & London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Koepping, Klaus-Peter. 1983. Adolf Bastian and the Psychic Unity of Mankind: The foundations of anthropology in nineteenth-century Germany. New York: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 1988. The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformations of an illusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2005. The Reinvention of Primitive Society: Transformations of a myth. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lang, Andrew. 1907. “Edward Burnett Tylor.” Anthropological Essays Presented to Edward Burnett Tylor, ed. by W. H. R. Rivers et al., 1–15. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, Joan. 1980. Culture in Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives: E. B. Tylor and the making of Primitive Culture . Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Anthropological Perspectives on the Origin of Language Debate in the Nineteenth Century: Edward B. Tylor and Charles Darwin”. Theorien vom Ursprung der Sprache ed. by Joachim Gessner & Wolfert von Rahden, vol. II1, 151–176. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levine, Philippa. 1986. The Amateur and the Professional: Antiquarians, historians and archaeologists in Victorian England, 1838–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linn, Andrew. 2008. ‘The Birth of Applied Linguistics: The Anglo-Scandinavian school as “discourse community”’. Historiographia Linguistica 35:3.342–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 2008 [1706]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. 5th edition, London. Ed. by Pauline Phemister. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lubbock, John. 1869. Pre-Historic Times as Illustrated by Ancient Remains, and the Manners and Customs of Modern Savages. 2nd ed. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
. 1870. The Origins of Civilisation and the Primitive Condition of Man. Mental and Social Condition of Savages. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
MacMahon, M[ichael] K. C. 1981. “Henry Sweet’s System of Shorthand”. Towards a History of Phonetics ed. by R. E. Asher & E. J. A. Henderson, 265–281. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
MacMahon, M. K. C. 1991. “Sweet, Europe and Phonetics”. Henry Sweet Society Newsletter 171.12–18 (November 1991).Google Scholar
1994. “Henry Sweet’s Linguistic Scholarship: The German connection”. Anglistik 5:2.91–101 (September 1994).Google Scholar
2001. “Modern Language Instruction and Phonetics in the Later 19th Century”. History of the Language Sciences ed. by Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe, Kees Versteegh, Tome II1, 1585–1595. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2004. “Sweet, Henry (1845–1912)”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Online ed., 2010.]Google Scholar
March, Francis A. 1870. A Comparative Grammar of the Anglo-Saxon Language. London: Sampson Low, Son & Marston.Google Scholar
Marett, R. R. 1936. Tylor. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Monaghan, John & Peter Just. 2000. Social and Cultural Anthropology: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Jerry D. 2009. Visions of Culture: An introduction to anthropological theories and theorists. 3rd ed. Lanham, Md. & Plymouth: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1877. Ancient Society. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 1992. Nineteenth-Century Linguistics. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Müller, Friedrich Max. 1895 [1856]. “Comparative Mythology”. Chips from a German Workshop. New edition, vol. IV1, 1–154. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
. 1861. Lectures on the Science of Language. First series. London: Longmans, Green, Longman & Roberts. (Repr., London: Routledge/Thoemmes, 1994.)Google Scholar
. 1864. Lectures on the Science of Language. Second series. London: Longmans, Green, Longman & Roberts. (Repr., London: Routledge/Thoemmes, 1994).Google Scholar
Myers, Frederic W. H. 1881. Wordsworth. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Onions, C[harles] T. 1921. “Henry Sweet 1845–1912”. Dictionary of National Biography 1912–1921 ed. by H. W. C. Davies & J. R. H. Weaver, 519–520. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, James. 1985. “Darwin and Landscape”. Victorian Science and Victorian Values: Literary perspectives ed. by James Paradis & Thomas Hebblethwaite, 85–110. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. 1997 [1967]. A Short History of Linguistics. 4th ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Segal, Robert A. 1998. The Myth and Ritual Theory: An anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002. “Myth as Primitive Philosophy: The case of E. B. Tylor”. Thinking through Myth: Philosophical perspectives ed. by Kevin Schilbrack, 18–45. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. 1952. Poetical Works. Ed. by Thomas Hutchinson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Richard C. 2009. “Claude Marcel (1793–1876): A neglected applied linguist?”. Language and History 52:2.171–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanley, E[ric] G. 1975. The Search for Anglo-Saxon Paganism. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer; Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stanley, E. G. 1981. “The Scholarly Recovery of the Significance of the Anglo-Saxon Records in Prose and Verse: A new bibliography”. Anglo-Saxon England 91.223–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann. 1855. Grammatik, Logik und Psychologie: Ihre Prinzipien und ihr Verhältnis zueinander. Berlin: Ferd. Dümmler. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1968.)Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. 1987. Victorian Anthropology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1995. After Tylor: British social anthropology, 1888–1951. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1870. Review of March (1870). The Academy (London), vol. II, No. 13, 26–28 (22 October 1870).Google Scholar
. 1871a. Review of Ellis (1869a, b). The Academy (London), vol. II, No. 25, 294–296 (1 June 1871).Google Scholar
. 1871b. Review of Ellis (1871). The Academy (London), vol. II, No. 26, 320–321 (15 June 1871).Google Scholar
. 1871c. “Sketch of the History of Anglo-Saxon Poetry”. Warton’s History of English Poetry ed. by W. C. Hazlitt, vol. 21, pp. 3–18. London: Reeves.Google Scholar
, ed. 1871–1872. King Alfred’s West Saxon Version of Gregory’s Pastoral Care. (= Early English Texts Society, original series, 45.) 21 vols. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1872a. “Germanic Studies”. The Academy (London), vol. III, No. 48, 198 (15 May 1872).Google Scholar
. 1872b. Review of Wedgwood (1871–1872). The Academy (London), vol. III, no. 49, 218–219 (1 June 1872).Google Scholar
. 1872c. Letter to Guðbrandur Vigfússon. Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS. Eng. misc. d. 131, f. 588.Google Scholar
. 1874. The History of English Sounds: From the earliest period, including an investigation of the general laws of sound change, and full word lists. London: Trübner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1876a. An Anglo-Saxon Reader in Prose and Verse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1876b. “Words, Logic, and Grammar”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1875/76.470–503. (Repr. in Sweet. 1913.1–33.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1877a. “Language and Thought”. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 61.457–481.Google Scholar
. 1877b. “Presidential Address”. At the anniversary meeting of the Philological Society, 18 May 1877. (Repr. in Sweet. 1913.80–94.)Google Scholar
. 1877c. Handbook of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1882a. An Anglo-Saxon Primer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1884. “The Practical Study of Language”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1882–84, 577–599. (Repr. in Sweet. 1913.34–55.)Google Scholar
. 1885a. The Oldest English Texts. (= Early English Texts Society, original series, 83.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1885b. Elementarbuch des gesprochenen Englisch. Oxford: Clarendon Press; Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
. 1892, 1898. A New English Grammar. 21 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1899. The Practical Study of Languages: A guide for teacher and learner. London: J. M. Dent. (Repr. London: Oxford University Press, 1964.)Google Scholar
. 1900. The History of Language. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
. 1913. Collected Papers. Ed. by H. C. Wyld. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael Welman. 2004. “Wright, Thomas (1810–1877)”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Online ed., 2010.]Google Scholar
Thorpe, Benjamin. 1846. Analecta Anglo-Saxonica: A selection in prose and verse from Anglo-Saxon authors of various ages, with a glossary. London: Smith, Elder.Google Scholar
Trigger, Bruce G. 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward Burnett. 1865. Researches into the Early History of Mankind and the Development of Civilisation. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
. 1866. “The Science of Language”. Quarterly Review 1191.394–435.Google Scholar
. 1871. Primitive Culture. 21 vols. London: Murray.Google Scholar
. 1877. Comments on Sweet (1877a). Journal of the Anthropological Institute 61.482.Google Scholar
. 1881. Anthropology: An introduction to the study of man and civilisation. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tyndall, John. 1870. On the Scientific Use of the Imagination. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Wallace, Alfred R. 1872. Review of Tylor (1871). The Academy (London), vol. III, No. 44, 69–71 (15 Feb. 1872).Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Hensleigh. 1871–1872. A Dictionary of English Etymology. 2nd ed. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 2000. “On the Limitations of Linguistics Applied”. Applied Linguistics 21:1.3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wordworth, William. 1971 [1850]. The Prelude. Ed. by J. C. Maxwell. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wrenn, C. L. 1946. “Henry Sweet”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1946.177–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Thomas. 1846. Essays on Subjects Connected with the Literature, Popular Superstitions, and History of England in the Middle Ages. 21 vols. London: John Russell Smith.Google Scholar
. 1861. Essays on Archæological Subjects. And on various subjects connected with the history of art, science, and literature in the Middle Ages. 21 vols. London: John Russell Smith.Google Scholar
. 1871. The Homes of Other Days. A history of domestic manners and sentiments in England. From the earliest period to modern times. London: Trübner.Google Scholar