Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 37:1/2 (2010) ► pp.263266
References (9)
References
Buchanan, James. 1762. The British Grammar. London: Printed for A. Miller.Google Scholar
Facchinetti, Roberta. 2000. “The Modal Verb shall between Grammar and Usage in the Nineteenth Century”. The History of English in a Social Context ed. by Dieter Kastovsky & Arthur Mettinger, 115–134. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González-Díaz, Victorina. 2003. The Evolution of the Comparative Degree in English: A CorpusBased Study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manchester. [Revised version published under the title English Adjective Comparison: A historical perspective (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2008).]Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Larisa Oldireva. 2002. Preterite and Past Participle Forms in English 1680–1790: Standardisation processes in public and private writing. Ph.D. dissertation, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Konopka, Marek. 1996. Strittige Erscheinungen der deutschen Syntax im 18. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langer, Nils. 2001. Linguistic Purism in Action: How auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polenz, Peter von. 1999. Deutsche Sprachgeschichte vom Spätmittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. Vol. III: 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takada, Hiroyuki. 1998. Grammatik und Sprachwirklichkeit von 1640–1700: Zur Rolle deutscher Grammatiker im schriftsprachlichen Ausgleichsprozeß. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, James. 1761. The English Verb. London: Printed for A. Miller.Google Scholar