Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 37:3 (2010) ► pp.321–340

William Dwight Whitney and the Social Dimension of Lexical Diffusion

| Gordon College

The paper traces how the American linguist William Dwight Whitney (1827–1894) and his intellectual descendants anticipated, and in part influenced, modern-day discussions of ‘lexical diffusion’, the piecemeal spread of phonological changes both through an individual speaker’s word-inventory and speaker-to-speaker through an entire community. Whitney regarded these two processes as inextricably linked; he also stressed comparison between different speech communities in search of locally distinct diffusionary patterns that challenged the Neogrammarian regularity hypothesis. Recent discussions of these and other aspects of lexical diffusion suggest that comparative-local studies, such as Whitney pioneered, remain essential for working out the explanatory nexus between lexical diffusion’s internally-phonological and social contexts.

Published online: 17 November 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.37.3.02alt
References
Alter, Stephen G.
2005 William Dwight Whitney and the Science of Language. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl & Hermann Osthoff
1967 [1878] “Preface to Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen ”. Reader in Nineteenth-Century Historical Indo-European Linguistics ed. and transl. by Winfred P. Lehmann, 197–209. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Christy, Craig
1983 Uniformitarianism in Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collinge, N[eville] E.
1994 “Historical Linguistics: History”. Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics ed. by R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, vol. III1, 1559–1567. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Bertold
1882 [1880] Introduction to the Study of Language. Transl. by Eva Channing [of Einleitung in das Studium der indogermanischen Sprachen]. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. (Repr., with an Introduction in English by Konrad Koerner, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1974.)Google Scholar
1908 Einleitung in das Studium der indogermanischen Sprachen. 5th ed. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Easton, Morton W[illiam]
1884 “Analogy and Uniformity”. American Journal of Philology 51.164–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Henry Allan, Jr.
1955 Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
2003 “Variationist Approaches to Phonological Change”. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, 369–400. New York: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
H[errick], R[obert]
1943 “Tarbell, Frank Bigelow”. Dictionary of American Biography. Published under the auspices of the American Council of Learned Societies, vol. XVIII1, p. 306. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles
1958 A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1922 Language: Its nature, origin and development. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.
2001 “Is there Such a Thing as ‘grammaticalization’?”. Language Sciences 231.163–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. & Richard D. Janda
2003 “Introduction”. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Joseph & Janda, 3–180. New York: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1995, 2003 “The Phonological Basis of Sound Change”. Handbook of Phonological Theory ed. by John A. Goldsmith, 640–670. Oxford & Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell. (Repr. in The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, 313–342. New York: Blackwell.)Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
ed. 1991 First Person Singular II: Autobiographies by North American scholars in the language sciences. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
2002 Toward a History of American Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004 “The Place of Geology in W. D. Whitney’s Linguistic Argument”. Essays in the History of Linguistics by Koerner, 145–158. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Hermann Paul and General Linguistic Theory”. Language Sciences 301.102–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1992 “Evidence for Regular Sound Change in English Dialect Geography”. History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics ed. by Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen, 42–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. I1: Internal factors. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lien, C[hienfa]
1994 “Lexical Diffusion”. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, III1, 2141–2144. Oxford & New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1967 “Each Word Has a History of its Own”. Glossa 11.137–149.Google Scholar
Milroy, James
1991 Linguistic Variation and Change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1983 Group Formation in Social Science. Carbondale, Ill.: Linguistic Research, Inc. [A thoroughly revised edition appeared as Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America: A social history (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1994.)]Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte
1990 Change in Language: Whitney, Bréal, and Wegener. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ogura, Mieko
1995 “The Development of Middle English i and u: A reply to Labov (1992, 1994)”. Diachronica 121.31–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paley, William
1825 [1785] Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. 11th American ed. Boston: Richardson & Lord.Google Scholar
Paul, Herman
1880 Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger
1931 [1924] The Discovery of Language: Linguistic science in the nineteenth century. Transl. by J[ohn] Webster Spargo [of Sprokvidenskapen i det Nittende Aarhundrede: Metoder och resultater]. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Repr., Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1962.]Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. (Repr. 1949.)Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo
1972 [1885] “On Sound Laws: Against the Neogrammarians”. Transl. by Theo Vennemann & Terence H. Wilbur [of Über die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Junggrammatiker (Berlin: R. Oppenheim 1885] Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the Transformational Theory of Phonological Change ed. by Theo Vennemann & Terence H. Wilbur, 39–72. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar H[oward]
1917 Linguistic Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Repr. 1962.)Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar H.
1924 “Phonetic Law and Imitation”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 44:1.38–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1947 An Introduction to Linguistic Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tarbell, Frank B[igelow]
1886 “Phonetic Law”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 171.5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S[hi]-Y[uan]
1969 “Competing Changes as a Cause of Residue”. Language 45: 1.9–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y.
ed. 1977 The Lexicon in Phonological Change. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S. Y. & C. F. Lien
1993 “Bidirectional Diffusion in Sound Change”. Historical Linguistics: Problems and prospectives ed. by Charles Jones, 345–400, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald
1986 An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog
1968 “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change”. Directions for Historical Linguistics ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 97–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Benjamin Ide
1901 “The Causes of Uniformity in Phonetic Change”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 321.5–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight
1867 Language and the Study of Language. New York: Scribner & Co.Google Scholar
1875 The Life and Growth of Language. New York: D. Appleton & Co.; London: Henry S. King.Google Scholar
1886 “The Method of Phonetic Change in Language”. Proceedings of the American Philological Association 171.xxxiii–xxxv.Google Scholar
1894 “Examples of Sporadic and Partial Phonetic Change in English”. Indogermanische Forschungen 41.32–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Terence H.
1977 “Introduction”. The Lautgesetz Controversy: A documentation ed. by Terence H. Wilbur, ix–xc. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1972 “Hugo Schuchardt and the Neogrammarians”. Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the Transformational Theory of Phonological Change ed. by Theo Vennemann & Terence H. Wilbur, 75–113. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Dovetto, Francesca M.
2018. An American at the origins of EuropeanSprachwissenschaftand Italian historiographical thought. Historiographia Linguistica 45:3 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.