Cover not available
Part of
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 38:1/2 (2011) ► pp.241–252
Miscellaneous

When Quotation Marks Matter

Rhellicanus and Boxhornius on the differences between the lingua Gallica and lingua Germanica

| Research Foundation Flanders – Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Published online: 26 May 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.38.1-2.17van
References
Anon.
1647 Vraagen voorghestelt over de Bediedinge van de tot noch toe onbekende afgodinne Nehalennia. Leyden: Van der Boxe.Google Scholar
Bonfante, Giuliano
1953/1954 “Ideas on the Kinship of the European Languages from 1200 to 1800”. Cahiers d’Histoire Mondiale 11.679–699.Google Scholar
Botley, Paul & Dirk van Miert
Forthcoming. The Complete Correspondence of Joseph Scaliger.
Boxhorn[ius], Marcus Zuerius
1647a Bediedinge van de tot noch toe onbekende afgodinne Nehalennia, over de dusent ende ettelicke hondert jaren onder het sandt begraven, dan onlancx ontdeckt op het strandt van Walcheren in Zeelandt. Leyden: Van der Boxe.Google Scholar
1647b Antwoord van Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn, gegeven op de Vraaghen, hem voorgestelt over de Bediedinge van de afgodinne Nehalennia, onlancx uytghegeven, in welcke de ghemeine herkomste van der Griecken, Romeinen ende Duytschen Tale uyt den Scythen duydelijck bewesen, ende verscheiden Oudheden van dese Volckeren grondelijck ontdekt ende verklaert worden. Leyden: Van der Boxe.Google Scholar
1650 De Graecorum, Romanorum et Germanorum linguis earumque symphonia dissertatio. Lugduni Batavorum: ex officina Guilielmi Christiani.Google Scholar
1654 Originum Gallicarum liber. In quo veteris et nobilissimae Gallorum gentis origines, antiquitates, mores, lingua et alia eruuntur et illustrantur. Cui accedit antiquae linguae Britannicae lexicon Britannico-Latinum, cum adiectis et insertis eiusdem authoris Adagiis Britannicis sapientiae veterum Druidum reliquiis et aliis antiquitatis Britannicae Gallicaeque nonnullis monumentis. Amstelodami: apud Ioannem Ianssonium.Google Scholar
1679 [1662] Epistolae et poemata. Ed. by Jacobus Baselius & Jacobus Thomasius. Francofurti: apud Johannem Theodorum. (First edition by Jacobus Baselius, Amstelodami: ex off. C. Commelini 1662.)Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
2006 “Why Sir William Jones Got It All Wrong, or Jones’ role in how to establish language families”. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo: International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 40:1/2.245–264.Google Scholar
Céard, Jean
1981 “Les transformations du genre du commentaire”. L’automne de la Renaissance, 1580–1630 ed. by Jean Lafond & André Stegmann, 101–115. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Chotzen, Theodor Max
1931 Primitieve keltistiek in de Nederlanden. Openbare les gehouden bij de opening van zijn colleges als privaat-docent in de Keltische philologie aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op 9 october 1931. Den Haag: Martin Niehoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colombat, Bernard
2007 “L’horizon de retrospection du Mithridate de Conrad Gessner (1555)”. History of Linguistics 2005: Selected Papers from the Tenth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS X), 1–5 September 2005, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois ed. by Douglas A. Kibbee, 89–102. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colombat, Bernard & Martin Peters
2009 Konrad Gesner: Mithridate = Mithridates (1555). (= Travaux d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 452.) Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Colvin, Stephen
2007 A Historical Greek Reader: Mycenaean to the Koine. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Considine, John
2010 “Why was Claude de Saumaise (1588–1653) interested in the Scythian hypothesis?”. Language & History 53:2. 81–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Leibniz as Lexicographer?”. History of Linguistics 2008: Selected papers from the Eleventh International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XI), Potsdam, 28th August – 2nd September 2008 ed. by Gerda Hassler & Gesina Volkmann, 217–224. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Caryl
2000 Adfeilion Babel: Agweddau ar syniadaeth ieithyddol y ddeunawfed ganrif. Caerdydd: Gwasg Prifysgol Cymru.Google Scholar
Davies, John
Antiquae linguae Britannicae, nunc vulgo dictae Cambro-Britannicae, a suis Cymraecae vel Cambricae, ab aliis Wallicae, et linguae Latinae dictionarium duplex. Londini: in aedibus R. Young for Davies.
Dekker, Kees
1999 The Origins of Old Germanic Studies in the Low Countries. (= Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History, 92.) Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deneire, Tom & Toon Van Hal
2006 Lipsius tegen Becanus: Over het Nederlands als oertaal. Editie, vertaling en interpretatie van zijn brief aan Hendrik Schotti (19 december 1598). Amersfoort: Florivallis.Google Scholar
Droixhe, Daniel
1978 La linguistique et l’appel de l’histoire (1600–1800): Rationalisme et révolutions positivistes. (= Langues & Cultures, 10.) Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
1989 “Boxhorn’s Bad Reputation: A chapter in academic linguistics”. Speculum historiographiae linguisticae. Kurzbeiträge der IV. Internationalen Konferenz zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften ed. by Klaus D. Dutz, 359–384. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Droixhe, Daniel, Jean-Claude Muller & Pierre Swiggers
1989 “Les correspondances de linguistes: Projet d’inventaire systématique”. Speculum historiographiae linguisticae. Kurzbeiträge der IV. Internationalen Konferenz zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften ed. by Klaus D. Dutz, 347–357. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Fellman, Jack
1974 “The First Historical Linguist”. Linguistics No. 1371.31–33.Google Scholar
1975 “On Sir William Jones and the Scythian Language”. Language Sciences 341.37–38.Google Scholar
1976 “Further Remarks on the Scythian Language”. Language Sciences 411.19.Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin
2010 [2004] Indo-European Language and Culture: an Introduction. (= Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics, 19.) 2nd ed. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony T., April Shelford & Nancy Siraisi
1992 New Worlds, Ancient Texts: The power of tradition and the shock of discovery. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M.
1974 “Fallacies in the History of Linguistics: Notes on the appraisal of the nineteenth century”. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Tradition and paradigms ed. by Dell Hymes, 346–358. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hofman, Rijcklof H. F.
1998 “Marcus Zuerius Boxhorn (1612–1653)”. Kelten en de Nederlanden van prehistorie tot heden ed. by Lauran Toorians, 149–167. Leuven & Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Holtzmann, Adolf
1855 Kelten und Germanen: Eine historische Untersuchung. Stuttgart: A. Krabbe.Google Scholar
Isebaert, Lambert, Peter Rogiest, Pierre Swiggers & Toon Van Hal
2009 “ Hortus Linguarum, the ‘Garden of languages’: Tuin der talen. Description and presentation of a digitalisation project”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 19:2.305–308.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1999 “The Concept of ‘Revolution’ in Linguistics: Historical, methodological and philosophical considerations”. History of Linguistics 1996: Selected Papers from the Seventh International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS VII) ed. by David Cram et al., vol. I1: Traditions of Linguistics Worldwide, 3–14. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm
1717 Collectanea etymologica illustrationi linguarum, veteris Celticae, Germanicae, Gallicae, aliarumque inservientia, cum praefatione Johannis Georgii Eccardi. Hanoverae: sumptibus Nicolai Foersteri.Google Scholar
Linn, Andrew
2005 “Research Ethics in Book-Based, Historical Research”. Flores Grammaticæ: Essays in Memory of Vivien Law ed. by Nicola McLelland & Andrew Linn, 21–32. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus
1589 C. Cornelii Taciti Opera quae exstant. Lugduni Batavorum: ex officina Plantiniana, apud Franciscum Raphelengium.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Walther
1983 “Die Stockhornias des Joannes Rhellicanus”. Humanistica Lovaniensia 321.218–224.Google Scholar
Margolin, Jean-Claude
1985 “Glaréan, commentateur du ‘de bello Gallico’”. Présence de César. Actes du Colloque des 9–11 décembre 1983 ed. by Raymond Chevalier, 183–212. Paris: Édition “Les Belles Lettres”.Google Scholar
Morgan, Prys
1973–1974 “Boxhorn, Leibniz, and the Welsh”. Studia Celtica 8/91.220–228.Google Scholar
Most, Glenn
1999 Commentaries = Kommentare. (= Aporemata, 4.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Nieuwstraten, Jaap
Forthcoming. Marcus Zuerius Boxhorn (1612–53).
Pade, Marianne
2005 On Renaissance Commentaries. (= Noctes neolatinae, 4.) Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Peters, Manfred
1974 Konrad Gesner: Mithridates. De differentiis linguarum tum veterum tum quae hodie apud diversas nationes in toto orbe terrarum in usu sunt. Aalen: Scientia.Google Scholar
Poppe, Erich
1986 Multiplex sane linguarum ac dialectorum varietas. Zur Quellenrekonstruktion im ‘Mithridates’ (1555) des Konrad Gessner am Beispiel des Keltischen. (= Arbeitsberichte Universität Münster; Institut für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 6.) Münster: Institut für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Rhellicanus, Joannes
1543 In C. Iulii Caesaris dictatoris viri disertissimi, et Auli Hirtii, seu Oppij, commentaria de Bello Gallico, Civili Pompeiano, Alexandrino, Africano, et Hispaniensi annotationes. Basileae: [per Hieronymum Curionem].Google Scholar
Rietbergen, Peter J. A. N.
2007 Europa’s India: Fascinatie en cultureel imperialisme, circa 1750 – circa 2000. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
Siebert, Susanne
1995 “Rhellikan, Johannes (Müller, Rhellicanus)”. Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon ed. by Friedrich-Wilhelm Bautz & Traugott Bautz, vol. VIII1.136–137. Herzberg: Bautz. [URL]
Szemerényi, Oswald
1980 “About Unrewriting the History of Linguistics”. Wege zur Universalienforschung. Sprachwissenschaftlichte Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler ed. by Gunter Brettschneider & Christian Lehmann, 151–162. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Van Driem, George
2001 Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region Containing an Introduction to the Symbiotic Theory of Language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Van Hal, Toon
2008 ‘Moedertalen en taalmoeders’: Methodologie, epistemologie en ideologie van het taalvergelijkend onderzoek in de renaissance, met bijzondere aandacht voor de bijdrage van de humanisten uit de Lage Landen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
2010 “On ‘the Scythian theory’: Reconstructing the outlines of Johannes Elichmann’s (1601/1602–1639) planned Archaeologia harmonica ”. Language & History 53:2. 70–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. “From Alauda to Zythus: Collecting and discussing Old-Gaulish words in Early Modern Europe”.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Van Hal, Toon & Raf Van Rooy
2017. ‘Differing only in dialect’, or How collocations can co-shape concepts. Language & Communication 56 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.