Cover not available
Article published In:
Robert Lowth (1710-1787): The making of his grammar and its influence
Guest-edited by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
[Historiographia Linguistica 39:1] 2012
► pp. 9–26

Robert Lowth and the Critics

Literary contexts for the “Critical Notes” in his Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762)

| University of Toronto,
This article provides a broad intellectual context for Robert Lowth’s (1710–1787) Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762), and in particular for the footnotes or “Critical Notes” in which he documented the grammatical errors of great dead writers. It is well known that Lowth’s notes were innovative in the English grammatical tradition, and that they contrasted and qualified the “Examples from the best Writers” in the Dictionary of the English Language (1755) by Samuel Johnson (1709–1784). Here the author places Lowth in broader context and demonstrate that the ‘bad’ grammar of vernacular classics had already been publicized in debates about translating the bible and editing Shakespeare. In the concluding discussion I draw on current studies of literary canons to argue that by crystallizing the difference between literary and standard language, Lowth’s grammar increased the socio-cultural capital of both.
Published online: 22 March 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.39.1.02per
References (74)
References
Anon. 1758a. Review of The Life of William of Wykeham, Bishop of Winchester by Robert Lowth (London: for A. Millar and R. & J. Dodsley, 1758). Critical Review 51.449–461.Google Scholar
. 1758b. Review of Memoirs of a Young Lady of Family (London: For J. Scott, 1758). Monthly Review 181.182–183.Google Scholar
. [1760] The Battle of the Reviews. London: printed for R. Marriner. (ECCO)Google Scholar
. 1762. Review of A Short Introduction to English Grammar: With critical notes [by Robert Lowth]. Critical Review 141.501–504.Google Scholar
. 1764. Review of The New Testament: Illustrated with notes critical and explanatory, by Richard Wynne (London: printed for R. & J. Dodsley). Critical Review 181.188–198.Google Scholar
Barnard, John ed., 1973. Pope: The critical heritage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Basker, James. 1988. Tobias Smollett: Critic and journalist. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2004. English in Modern Times: 1700–1945. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Boswell, James. 1785. The Journal of a Tour to the Hebrides, with Samuel Johnson, LL.D. London: Printed by Henry Baldwin, for Charles Dilly. (ECCO)Google Scholar
Buschmann-Göbels, Astrid. 2008. “ Bellum Grammaticale (1712): A battle of books and a battle for the market”. Tieken-Boon van Ostade ed., 2008.81–100. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Edwards, Thomas. 1748. A Supplement to Mr. Warburton’s Edition of Shakespear. Being the canons of criticism, and glossary, collected from the notes in that celebrated work. London: printed for M. Cooper. (ECCO)Google Scholar
ECCO: Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Thomson Gale.
Fisher, A[nne]. 1753 [1745]. A New Grammar, with exercises of bad English. 3rd ed., London: Printed for the author. (ECCO)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan M. 1998. “The Commerce of Language in the Pursuit of Politeness in Eighteenth-Century England”. English Studies 79:4.309–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, Antonia. 1994. “‘The Self-Impannelled Jury’: The reception of review journals, 1749–1760”. Studies in Newspaper and Periodical History 1993 Annual ed., by Michael Harris, 27–51. Westport, Conn. & London: Greenwood.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Review Journals and the Reading Public”. Books and Their Readers in Eighteenth-Century England: New essays ed., by Isabel Rivers, 171–190. London & New York: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Colin. 1991. Shakespeare Domesticated: The eighteenth-century editions. Aldershot, Hants: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Gondris, Joanna ed., 1998. Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare editing in the eighteenth century. Madison [N.J.]: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
Gorak, Jan. 1997. “Canon and Canon Formation”. Nisbet & Rawson ed., 1997.560–584.Google Scholar
Greenslade, S. L. 1963. “Chapter IV: English Versions of the Bible, 1525–1611”. Greenslade ed., 1963.141–174.Google Scholar
, ed., 1963. The Cambridge History of the Bible. Vol. III1: The West from the Reformation to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwood, James. 1753 [1711]. An Essay towards a Practical English Grammar. 5th ed., London: For J. Nourse. (ECCO)Google Scholar
Harwood, E[dward]. 1768. A Liberal Translation of the New Testament; Being an attempt to translate the sacred writings with the same freedom, spirit, and elegance, with which other English translations from the Greek classics have lately been executed. 21 vols. London: printed for T. Becket & P.A. De Hondt [et al.], (ECCO)Google Scholar
Haugen, Kristine Louise. 2011. Richard Bentley: Poetry and enlightenment. Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, Simon. 1995. Scholars and Gentlemen: Shakespearian textual criticism and representations of scholarly labour, 1725–1765. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. 1747. The Plan of a Dictionary of the English Language. London: printed for J. & P. Knapton [et al.], (ECCO)Google Scholar
. 1755. A Dictionary of the English Language: In which the words are deduced from their originals, and illustrated in their different significations by examples from the best writers. 2nd ed., 21 vols. London: printed by W. Strahan, for J. & P. Knapton [et al.], (ECCO)Google Scholar
. 2005. The Yale Edition of the Works of Samuel Johnson. Vol. XVIII1: Johnson on the English Language ed., by Gwin J. Kolb & Robert DeMaria, Jr. New Haven, Conn. & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kenrick, William. 1759. A Scrutiny; Or the criticks criticis’d. London: Printed for T. Wilcox. (ECCO.)Google Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan Brody. 1998. Making the English Canon: Print-capitalism and the cultural past, 1700–1770. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert. 1758. A Sermon Preached at the Visitation of Richard, Lord Bishop of Durham. London: Printed for R. & J. Dodsley, and sold by M. Cooper. (ECCO.)Google Scholar
. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar; With critical notes. London: J. Hughs for A. Millar, and for R. & J. Dodsley. (ECCO.)Google Scholar
. 1787–1753. Lectures on the Sacred Poetry of the Hebrews. Transl. by George Gregory. 21 vols. London: For J. Johnson. [Translation of 1753 Praelectiones de sacra poesi Hebraeorum.] (ECCO)Google Scholar
Lynch, Jack. 2003. The Age of Elizabeth in the Age of Johnson. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mack, Maynard. 1986. Alexander Pope: A life. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Marsden, Jean I. 1995. The Re-Imagined Text: Shakespeare, adaptation, & eighteenth-century literary theory. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
McDermott, Anne. 2005. “Johnson the Prescriptivist? The case for the defense”. Anniversary Essays on Johnson’s “Dictionary” ed., by Jack Lynch & Anne McDermott, 113–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian. 1987. The Teaching of English from the Sixteenth Century to 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navest, Karlijn. 2007. “Marginalia as Evidence: The unidentified hands in Lowth’s Short introduction to English grammar (1762)”. Historiographia Linguistica 34:1.1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, H. B. & Claude Rawson, eds., 1997. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Vol. IV1: Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norton, David. 2000 [1993]. A History of the English Bible as Literature. Rev ed., 21 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University. [Note addition of ‘English’ in the title.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. A Textual History of the King James Bible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ODNB: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. 2004 ed., by H. C. G. Matthew & Brian Harrison. Online ed., by Lawrence Goldman, 2008–. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oldireva Gustafsson, Larisa. 2002. Preterite and Past Participle Forms in English 1680–1790. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Osselton, Noel E. 1958. Branded Words in English Dictionaries before Johnson. Groningen: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar
Patey, Douglas Lane. 1997. “The Institution of Criticism in the Eighteenth Century”. Nisbet & Rawson, ed. 1997.3–31.Google Scholar
Percy, Carol. 1997. “Paradigms Lost: Bishop Lowth and the ‘poetic dialect’ in his English grammar”. Neophilologus 811.129–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Mid-Century Grammars and their Reception in the Monthly Review and the Critical Review ”. Tieken-Boon van Ostade ed., 2008, 125–142. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Periodical Reviews and the Rise of Prescriptivism: the Monthly (1749–1844) and Critical Review (1756–1817) in the eighteenth century”. Current Issues in Late Modern English ed. by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim van der Wurff, 117–150. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2010. “How Eighteenth-Century Book Reviewers Became Language Guardians”. Social Roles and Language Practices in Late Modern English ed., by Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin, 55–85. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, Matthew. 1759. Remarks upon Several Passages of Scripture. Cambridge: printed by J. Bentham, for Messrs Thurlbourn & Woodyer, [et al.].Google Scholar
Purver, Anthony. 1764. A New and Literal Translation of All the Books of the Old and New Testament; with notes, critical and explanatory. London: printed by W. Richardson & S. Clark: And sold by William Johnston.Google Scholar
Rose, William. 1758. Review of The life of William of Wykeham, Bishop of Winchester, by Robert Lowth. Monthly Review 191.43–63.Google Scholar
. 1762. Review of A Short Introduction to English Grammar: With critical notes [by Robert Lowth]. Monthly Review 271.37–41.Google Scholar
Ross, Trevor. 1998. The Making of the English Literary Canon: From the Middle Ages to the late eighteenth century. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. 1723–1725. The Works of Shakespear [sic]. In six volumes. Collated and corrected by the former editions, By Mr. Pope. London: printed for Jacob Tonson in the Strand. (ECCO.)Google Scholar
. 1733. The Works of Shakespeare: In seven volumes. Collated with the oldest copies, and corrected; with notes, explanatory, and critical: By Mr. Theobald. London: Printed for Jacob Tonson. (ECCO.)Google Scholar
. 1747. The Works of Shakespear [sic] in eight volumes by Mr. Pope and Mr. Warburton. London: Printed for J. & P. Knapton [et al]., (ECCO.)Google Scholar
Smith, David Nichol. 1963 [1903]. “Introduction: Shakespearian Criticism in the Eighteenth Century”. Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare ed. by D[avid] Nichol Smith 2nd ed., xi–lxii. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Sundby, Bertil, Anne Kari Bjørge & Kari E. Haugland. 1991. A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swift, Jonathan. 1712. A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue. London: for Benj. Tooke. (ECCO.)Google Scholar
Terry, Richard. 1997. “Literature, Aesthetics, and Canonicity in the Eighteenth Century”. Eighteenth-Century Life 21:1.80–101.Google Scholar
Theobald, Lewis. 1726, Shakespeare Restored: Or, a specimen of the many errors, as well committed, as unamended, by Mr. Pope in his late edition of this poet. London: printed for R. Franklin & T. Woodman [et al.].Google Scholar
Thompson, Ann. 1998. “‘Making Him Speak True English’: Grammatical emendation in some eighteenth-century editions of Shakespeare, with particular reference to Cymbeline ”. Gondris ed., 1998.71–85.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2002. “Robert Lowth and the Strong Verb System”. Language Sciences 241.459–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “The 1760s: Grammars, grammarians, and the booksellers”. Tieken-Boon van Ostade ed., 2008.101–124.Google Scholar
ed., 2008. Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The Bishop’s Grammar: Robert Lowth and the rise of prescriptivism in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus. 1997. Shakespeare, Milton and Eighteenth-Century Literary Editing: The beginnings of interpretative scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Scholarly Editing: Patristics, classical literature and Shakespeare”. Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Vol. V1: 1695–1830 ed., by Michael F. Suarez & Michael Turner, 684–698. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard. 2002. “From Polite Language to Educated Language: The re-emergence of an ideology”. Alternative Histories of English ed. by Richard Watts & Peter Trudgill, 155–172. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weigle, Luther D. & C. F. D. Moule. 1963. “Chapter X: English Versions since 1611”. Greenslade ed., 1997.361–382.Google Scholar
WBIS: World Biographical Information System. 2004. “Richard Wynne”. München: De Gruyter. [URL]
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2008. “Preposition Stranding in the Eighteenth Century: Something to talk about”. Tieken-Boon van Ostade ed., 2008, 229–257. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wilton, David
2014. Rethinking the prescriptivist–descriptivist dyad: motives and methods in two eighteenth-century grammars. English Today 30:3 ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.