“My imperfect attempt towards an English Grammar”
Lowth’s indebtedness to James Harris in revising his grammar
This article provides an analysis of the only evidence that has — to the author’s knowledge — come down to us of the correspondence between the most authoritative 18th-century English grammarian Robert Lowth (1710–1787) and James Harris (1709–1780), author of the philosophical grammar Hermes (1751). The two extant letters uniquely provide insight into Lowth’s views on the pedagogical function of his grammar, on the innovatory aspect of his critical footnotes, and on some of the doubts and uncertainties he experienced while writing his grammar. All this adds to the radically different view of Lowth as a grammarian presented in The Bishop’s Grammar (Tieken-Boon van Ostade 2011), while the article also throws light on Lowth’s attempts at establishing a more private relationship with the author of one of the most important works within the wider 18th-century English grammatical tradition.
References (22)
References
Aitchison, Jean. 1981. Language Change: Progress or decay? London: Fontana.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burrows, Donald & Rosemary Dunhill. 2002. Music and Theatre in Handel’s World: The family papers of James Harris, 1732–1780. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cash, Derek. 2002. Access to Museum Culture: The British Museum from 1753 to 1836. <[URL]>.
ECCO: Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Thomson Gale.
Harris, James. 1751. Hermes: or, a Philosophical Inquiry concerning Language and Universal Grammar. London: printed for J. Nourse.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, James. 1781. Philological Inquiries in Three Parts by James Harris Esq. Volume I1. London: printed for C. Nourse.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hepworth, Brian. 1978. Robert Lowth. Boston: Twayne.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lowth, Robert. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar; with critical notes. London: J. Hughs for A. Millar, and for R. and J. Dodsley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miyawaki, Masataka. 2002. James Harris’s Theory of Universal Grammar: A synthesis of the Aristotelian and Platonic conceptions of language. Münster: Nodus.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mossner, E. C. & I. S. Ross, eds. 1987. Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Volume VI1. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Navest, Karlijn. 2006. “An index of names to Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762), (1763), (1764)”. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 61 ([URL]; go to: Contents, Articles).
Navest, Karlijn. 2011. John Ash and the Rise of the Children’s Grammar. Utrecht: LOT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ODNB: The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Online edition: [URL]
OED: The Oxford English Dictionary. Online edition: [URL]
Probyn, Clive T. 1991. The Sociable Humanist: The life and works of James Harris 1709–1780. Provincial and metropolitan culture in eighteenth-century England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2003. “‘Tom’s grammar’: The genesis of Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar revisited”. The Teaching of English in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: Essays for Ian Michael on his 88th birthday ed. by Frances Austen & Christopher Stray (= Special issue of Paradigm 2/7), 36–45.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2011. The Bishop’s Grammar: Robert Lowth and the rise of prescriptivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid & Karlijn Navest. 2006. “Introduction”. Navest (2006).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tierney, James E., ed. 1988. The Correspondence of Robert Dodsley 1733–1764. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ward, John. 1758. Four Essays upon the English Language. London: printed for JohnWard.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Wilton, David
2014.
Rethinking the prescriptivist–descriptivist dyad: motives and methods in two eighteenth-century grammars.
English Today 30:3
► pp. 38 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.