Review published in:
Robert Lowth (1710-1787): The making of his grammar and its influence
Guest-edited by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
[Historiographia Linguistica 39:1] 2012
► pp. 129133
References

References

Koerner, E. F. K[onrad]
1987 “On the Problem of ‘Influence’ in Linguistic Historiography”. Papers in the History of Linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS III), Princeton, 19–23 August 1984 ed. by Hans Aarsleff, Louis G. Kelly & Hans-Josef Niederehe, 13–28. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins (Repr. in Practicing Linguistic Historiography by Koerner, 31–46. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1989.)Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1993 “The Problem of Metalanguage in Linguistic Historiography”. Studies in Language 17:1.111–134.Google Scholar
van der Loon, Piet
1966 “The Manila Incunabula and Early Hokkien Studies (Part I)”. Asia Major 12.1–43.Google Scholar
1967 “The Manila Incunabula and Early Hokkien Studies (Part II)”. Asia Major 13.95–186.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1985Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
2004New Dialect Formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar