Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 39:2/3 (2012) ► pp.305–326

Contextualising Baxtin’s Linguistic Ideas

The case of metalinguistics

 | University of Jyväskylä
This article discusses the origins and formation of the notion of ‘metalinguistics’ in Mixail Mixajlovič Baxtin’s (1895–1975) writings. It is argued that the discussion of metalinguistics and the division of labour within the study of language in the United States in the 1940s and 1950s may have exerted a more profound influence on the formation of Baxtin’s linguistic views than was previously thought. The article investigates the nature and extent of this interaction and shows that there are interesting parallels between Baxtin’s conception of metalinguistics and the metalinguistics writings of George L. Trager (1906–1992). This suggests that, apart from any purely terminological influence, the way in which Baxtin defined the scope of his metalinguistics as a specific discipline separate from linguistics may have been inspired by the writings of the American structuralists.
Published online: 23 November 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.39.2-3.06lah
References (50)
References
Admoni, V[ladimir] G[rigor’evič]. 1956. “Razvitie sintaksičeskoj teorii na Zapade v XX v. i strukturalizm [The development of the theory of syntax in the West in the 20th century and structuralism]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1956/61.48–64.Google Scholar
Alpatov, V[ladimir] M[ixajlovič]. 2005. Vološinov, Baxtin i lingvistika [Vološinov, Baxtin and linguistics]. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.Google Scholar
Anon. 1956. “O nekotoryx aktual’nyx zadačax sovremennogo sovetskogo jazykoznanija [On some topical tasks of contemporary Soviet linguistics]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1956/11.3–13.Google Scholar
Axmanova, O[l’ga] S[ergeevna]. 1952. “O metode lingvističeskogo issledovanija u amerikanskix strukturalistov [On the method of linguistic investigation among American structuralists]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1952/51.92–105.Google Scholar
Axmanova, O. S. 1953. “Glossematika Luj El’msleva kak projavlenie upadka sovremennogo buržuaznogo jazykoznanija [Louis Hjelmslev’s glossematics as a manifestation of the decline of contemporary bourgeois linguistics]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1953/31.25–47.Google Scholar
1955. Osnovnye napravlenija lingvističeskogo strukturalizma [Basic trends in linguistic structuralism]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Baxtin, M[ixail] M[ixajlovič]. 1975 [1934–1935]. “Slovo v romane [Discourse in the novel]”. Voprosy literatury i ėstetiki, 72–233. Moskva: Xudožestvennaja literatura.Google Scholar
Baxtin, M. M. 1984 [1963]. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Transl. by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
1996a [1951–1953]. “Iz arxivnyx zapisej k rabote ‘Problema rečevyx žanrov’ [From the archival notes on the work ‘The problem of speech genres’]”. Sobranie sočinenij, vol. V1, 159–206. Moskva: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
1996b [1959]. “Problema teksta [The problem of the text]”. Sobranie sočinenij, vol. V1, 159–206. Moskva: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
1996c [1953–1954] “Problema rečevyx žanrov [The problem of speech genres]”. Sobranie sočinenij, vol. V1, 306–326. Moskva: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
2001 [1957–1958] “Jazyk i reč’ [Language and speech]”. Dialog. Karnaval. Xronotop 11.23–31.Google Scholar
2002a [1963]. “Problemy poėtiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics]”. Sobranie sočinenij, vol. VI1, 5–300. Moskva: Russkie slovari/Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
2002b. “Rabočie zapisi 60-x – načala 70-x godov [Working notes from the 1960s and the early 1970s]”. Sobranie sočinenij, vol. VI1, 371–439. Moskva: Russkie slovari/Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard & George L. Trager. 1942. Outline of Linguistic Analysis. Baltimore, Md.: Linguistic Society of America at the Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Brandist, Craig. 2002. The Bakhtin Circle: Philosophy, culture and politics. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
. 2003a. “The Origins of Soviet Sociolinguistics”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 71.213–231. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003b. “Bakhtine, la sociologie du langage et le roman”. Le discours sur la langue en URSS à l’époque stalinienne (épistémologie, philosophie, idéologie), ed. by Patrick Sériot (= Cahiers de l’ILSL, 14), 59–83. Lausanne.Google Scholar
Brandist, Craig & Mika Lähteenmäki. 2010. “Early Soviet sociology of language and Mikhail Bakhtin’s essays on the novel of the 1930s”. Politics and the Theory of Language in the USSR 1917–1938, ed. by Craig Brandist & Katya Chown, 69–88. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, John B[issell]. 1955. The Study of Language: A survey of linguistics and related disciplines in America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duvakin, Viktor D[mitrievič]. 1996. Besedy V. D. Duvakina s M. M. Baxtinym [Conversations of V. D. Duvakin with M. M. Baxtin]. Moskva: “Progress”.Google Scholar
Gleason, Henry A[llan] Jr 1959 [1955]. Vvedenie v deskriptivnuju lingvistiku [An introduction to descriptive linguistics]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury.Google Scholar
Go-čžan, Sjuj. 1959. “Obzor struktural’nogo napravlenija v lingvistike [A review of the structural trend in linguistics]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1959/31.40–60.Google Scholar
Gogotišvili, L[judmila] A[rčilovna]. 1996. “Kommentarii k ‘Probleme teksta’ [Commentaries on ‘The problem of the text’]”. Mixail M. Baxtin Sobranie sočinenij, vol. V1, 159–206. Moskva: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
Guxman, M[irra] M[oiseevna]. 1954. “Ė. Sėpir i ėtnografičeskaja lingvistika [E. Sapir and ethnographical linguistics]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1954/11.10–27.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1951. “Directions in modern linguistics”. Language 271.211–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirschkop, Ken. 1999. Mikahail Bakhtin: An aesthetic for democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1969 [1943]. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Transl. by Francis J. Whitfield. Second revised edition. Madison, Milwaukee, and London: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V[jačeslav] Vs[evolodovič]. 1996 [1973]. “Značenie idej M. M. Baxtina o znake, vyskazyvnii i dialoge dlja sovremennoj semiotiki [The significance of M. M. Baxtin’s ideas on sign, utterance and dialogue for contemporary semiotics]”. Dialog. Karnaval. Xronotop 31.5–58.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2002. From Whitney to Chomsky: Essays in the history of American linguistics. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 103.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Alan. 2006. “Trager, George L. (1906–1992)”. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. Second edition, vol. XIII1, 15–17. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kljueva, I[rina] V[asil’evna]. & L[judmila] M[ixajlovna] Lisunova. 2010. M. M. Baxtin: Myslitel’, pedagog, čelovek [M. M. Baxtin: Thinker, pedagogue, person]. Saransk: Ozon.ru.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K[onrad]. 1995. Professing Linguistic Historiography. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 79.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 2006. “Severing the Gordian knot: notes on the Baxtin myth”. Filologija, russkij jazyk, obrazovanie: sbornik statej, posvjaščënnyj jubileju professora L. A. Verbickoj, ed. by [adim] B[orisovič] Kasevič, I[gor’] V[asil’evič] Murin & V[ladimir] N[ikolaevič] Trojan, 143–157. Sankt-Peterburg: Filologičeskij fakul’tet Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Lähteenmäki, Mika. 2003. “On the Interpretation of Bachtin’s Linguistic Ideas: The problem of the texts from 1950–60s”. Russian Linguistics 11.23–39. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Nikoi Marr and the Idea of a Unified Language”. Language & Communication 261.285–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lähteenmäki, Mika & Nikolaj Leonidovič Vasil’ev. 2005. “Recepcija ‘novogo učenija o jazyke’ N. Ja. Marra v rabotax V. N. Vološinova: Iskrennost’ ili kon’’junktura? [The reception of N. Ja. Marr’s “New theory of language” in the works of V. N. Vološinov: sincerity or a reflection of how things were]”. Russian Linguistics 11.71–94. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Penny. 1996. The Whorf Complex Theory: A critical reconstruction. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 91.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piotrovskij, R[ajmund] G[enrixovič]. 1957. “Strukturalizm i jazykovedčeskaja praktika (Vozmožno li struktural’naja dialektologija) [Structuralism and linguistic practice (is structural dialectology possible)]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1957/41.26–35.Google Scholar
Stalin, I[osif] V[issarionovič]. 1950. Otnositel’no marksizma v jazykoznanii. K nekotorym voprosam jazykoznanija [On Marxism in linguistics: On some questions of linguistics]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Pravda.Google Scholar
Trager, George L[eonard]. 1949. The Field of Linguistics. Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers. Norman, Oklahoma: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. 1952. “Prefatory note”. Benjamin L. Whorf, Collected Papers on Metalinguistics, p. 111. Washington, D.C.: Department of State, Foreign Service Institute.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. & Henry L. Smith Jr. 1952. “Metalinguistics”. ETC: A Review of General Semantics 31.163–164.Google Scholar
1951. An Outline of English Structure. (= Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 3.) Norman, Okla.: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar
Vasil’ev, N[ikolaj] L[eonidovič]. 1992. “Teorija metalingvistiki v filologičeskoj koncepcii M. M. Baxtina [Metalinguistic theory in the philological conception of M. M. Baxtin]”. M. M. Baxtin: Problemy naučnogo nasledija ed. by S[emën] S[emënovič] Konkin, N[ikolaj] L[eonidovič] Vasil’ev, A[leksandr] A[natol’evič]. Iljušin, O[leg] E[fimovič] Osovskij & A[levtina] V[asil’evna] Syrkina, 45–52. Saransk: Izdatel’stvo Mordovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V[alentin] N[ikolaevič]. 1929. Marksizm i filosofija jazyka [Marxism and the philosophy of language]. Leningrad: Priboj.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1952. Collected Papers on Metalinguistics. Washington, D.C.: Department of State, Foreign Service Institute.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee & George L. Trager. 1937. “Uto-Aztecan and Tanoan”. American Anthropologist 391.609–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Ed. with an introduction by John B. Carroll. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (20th printing, 2000.)Google Scholar
Zvegincev, V[ladimir] A[ndreevič]. 1959. “Deskriptivnaja lingvistika [Descriptive linguistics]”. Henry A. Gleason Vvedenie v deskriptivnuju lingvistiku, 5–26. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Vassiliev, Nikolai L.
2021. Observações de leitura sobre o livro de M. M. Bakhtin Problemas da criação/poética de Dostoiévski. Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso 16:2 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Lähteenmäki, Mika
2014. The Soviet reception of Edward Sapir’s linguistic ideas from the 1920s to the 1950s. Russian Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2013. Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, 2013. Isis 104:S1 ► pp. i ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.