Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 41:1 (2014) ► pp.79–108

L’hypothèse de Firth

Wittgenstein, héritier de Malinowski?

| Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris
Le but de cet article est d’évaluer l’hypothèse de John Rupert Firth (1890–1960) énonçant que l’article de l’anthropologue Bronislaw Malinowski (1884–1942), “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages” (1923), constituerait une des sources d’inspiration ayant conduit Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951) à élaborer une nouvelle conception de la signification en termes d’‘usage’. S’appuyant sur certains passages des Philosophical Investigations (1953), Firth établit ainsi une filiation entre les deux grandes idées phares de Malinowski, à savoir l’importance de la notion de ‘contexte de situation’ et l’idée que le langage serait un ‘mode d’action’ et les principales thèses (la signification comme usage, l’acquisition du langage, le langage comme un ensemble de jeux) que développera Wittgenstein. L’examen du bien fondé de cette hypothèse conduira à préciser la synergie des idées qui eut lieu en matière de pragmatique dans l’Angleterre de la première moitié du XXe siècle.

Article language: French

Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.41.1.03god
References (72)
Références bibliographiques
Auroux, Sylvain & Simone Delesalle. 1990. “French Semantics of the Late Nineteenth Century and Lady Welby’s Significs”. Essays on Significs ed. by H. Walter Schmitz, 105–131. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. 1961. “Performative Utterances”. Philosophical Papers ed. by J. O. Urmson et G. J. Warnock, 233–252. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ayer, Alfred. 1986 [1985]. Wittgenstein ou le génie face à la métaphysique. Paris: Seghers. [Traduction française de Robert Davreu.]Google Scholar
Bouveresse, Jacques. 1987a. La force de la règle: Wittgenstein et l’invention de la nécessité. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
. 1987b. Le mythe de l’intériorité: Expérience, signification et langage privé chez Wittgenstein. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1932. “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache”. Erkenntnis 21 [numéro entier]. [Traduction française par Ernest Vouillemin, “La science et la métaphysique devant l’analyse logique du langage”. Actualités scientifiques et industrielles 1721. Paris: Hermann & Cie., 1934.]Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 1969. Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chauviré, Christiane. 1989. Ludwig Wittgenstein. Paris: Seuil. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Voir le visible: La seconde philosophie de Wittgenstein. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Le moment anthropologique de Wittgenstein. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Les mirages de l’introspection: Wittgenstein critique de James”. Revista Colombiana de Filosofia de la Ciencia 10:20/21.147–160.Google Scholar
Chauviré, Christiane & Jérôme Sackur. 2003. Le vocabulaire de Wittgenstein. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 1989. “Rules: Looking in the right place”. Wittgenstein: Attention to particulars ed. by Dewi Z. Phillips & Peter Winch, 12–24. New York: St Martin Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, philosophy, and the mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, Matthew. 1966. “Wittgenstein and James”. The New Scholasticism 40:3.331–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, John Rupert. 1957. “Ethnographic Analysis and Language with Reference to Malinowski’s Views”. Man and Culture: An evaluation of the work of Bronislaw Malinoswki ed. by Raymond Firth, 93–118. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Repr. in Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952–1959 ed. by Frank R. Palmer, 137–167. London & Harlow: Longmans, Green & Co., 1968.)Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1998. Language and Solitude: Wittgenstein, Malinowski and the Habsburg Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann. 1996. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell. [Traduction française par Hélène Roudier de Lara et Philippe de Lara. Dictionnaire Wittgenstein. Paris: Gallimard, 2003.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Godart-Wendling, Béatrice. 1997. “Le statut du mot dans les formalismes de Carnap et d’Ajdukiewicz”. Mot et Grammaires éd. par Bernard Fradin & Jean-Marie Marandin, 181–197. Paris: Didier Erudition.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Nom et classe chez Carnap”. Essais sur le nom et la nominalisation. (= Travaux du Centre de Recherches Sémiologiques, 67), 55–74. Neuchâtel: CdRS.Google Scholar
Goodman, Russell B. 1994. “What Wittgenstein Learned from William James”. History of Philosophy Quaterly 11:3.339–354.Google Scholar
2002. Wittgenstein and William James. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, W[illiam] Terrence. 1982. A History of Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, W. Terrence. 1990. “C. K. Ogden, Edward Sapir, Leonard Bloomfield, and the Geometry of Semantics”. History and Historiography of Linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS IV), Trier, 24–28 August 1987 ed. by Hans-Josef Niederehe & E. F. Konrad Koerner, 821–832. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haller, Rudolf. 1984. “Lebensform oder Lebensformen?”. Grazer Philosophische Studien 211.55–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Neopositivismus: Eine historische Einführung in die Philosophie des Wiener Kreises. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. 2005. “Firth, J. R (John Rupert)”. Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language ed. by Siobhan Chapman & Christopher Routledge, 80–86. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. 21 vols. New York & London: Henry Holt & Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1901–1902. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A study in human nature. 21 vols. Garden City & New York: Doubleday. [Traduction française de Frank Abauzit, Les formes multiples de l’expérience religieuse. Chambéry: Éditions Exergue, 2001.]Google Scholar
Korta, Kepa. 2008. “Malinowski and Pragmatics: Claim making in the history of linguistics”. Journal of Pragmatics 40:10.1645–1660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1982. Wittgenstein: On rules and private language. Oxford: Blackwell. [Traduction française par Thierry Marchaise, Règles et langage privé: Introduction au paradoxe de Wittgenstein. Paris: Seuil, 1996.]Google Scholar
Langendoen, Terence. 1968. The London School of Linguistics: A study of the linguistic theories of B. Malinowski and J. R. Firth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lara, Philippe de. 2001. “Le paradoxe de la règle et comment s’en débarasser”. Laugier, éd. 2001.97–127.Google Scholar
Laugier, Sandra, ed. 2001. Wittgenstein, métaphysique et jeux de langage. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
. 2009. Wittgenstein: Les sens de l’usage. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Laugier, Sandra & Christiane Chauviré, éds. 2006. Lire les Recherches Philosophiques de Wittgenstein. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific; an account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea, with a preface by Sir James George Frazer. London: Routledge; New York: Dutton. [Traduction française par André et Simonne Devyver, Les Argonautes du Pacifique occidental. Paris: Gallimard, 1989.]Google Scholar
. 1923. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages”. Supplément I de The Meaning of Meaning. Charles Ogden & Ivor Richards 1923, 296–336. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
. 1935. Coral Gardens and their Magic, vol. II: The Language of Magic and Gardening. London: Allen & Unwin. (2e éd., with an introduction by Edmund Leach, vii–xvii. Ibid., 1966.)Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1981. “Non-Cognitivism and Rule-Following”. Wittgenstein: To follow a rule ed. by Steven Holtzman & Christopher Leich, 141–162. London: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Brian. 2008. Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911–1951. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monk, Ray. 1991. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The duty of genius. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles. 1938. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte. 1995. “The 1930s – At the Birth of a Pragmatic Conception of Language”. Historiographia Linguistica 22:3.311–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Anthropology, Egyptology, and Linguistics: Malinowski and Gardiner on the functions of language”. Linguists and their Diversions: Festschrift for Robert H. Robins on his 75th birthday ed. by Vivien Law & Werner Hüllen, 361–394. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Saussure and Wittgenstein: The arbitrariness and autonomy of grammar”. Et multum et multa: Festschrift für Peter Wunderli zum 60. Geburtstag ed by Edeltraud Werner, Ricarda Liver, Yvonne Stork & Martina Nicklaus, 143–157. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte & Clarke David. 1996. Language, Action, and Context. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Charles K[ay] & Ivor A[rmstrong] Richards. 1923. The Meaning of Meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (10th ed. 1956)Google Scholar
Ouelbani, Mélika. 2006. Le Cercle de Vienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T Press.Google Scholar
Raïd, Layla. 2001. “Signification et jeu de langage”. Laugier, éd. 2001.21–42.Google Scholar
Robins, R[obert] H[enry]. 1961. “John Rupert Firth”. Language 37:2.191–200.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. 1967. A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rosat, Jean-Jacques. 2001. “La cérémonie inutile”. Laugier, éd. 2001.43–68.Google Scholar
Rebori, Victoria. 2002. “The Legacy of J. R. Firth: A report on recent research”. Historiographia Linguistica 29:1/2.165–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1921. The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Bernd. 1984. Malinowskis Pragmasemantik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H[einrich] Walter. 1985. “Victoria Lady Welby’s Significs: The origin of the Signific Movement”. Victoria Lady Welby, Significs and Language, The articulate Form of our Expressive and Interpretative Resources. Reprint of the edition London, 1911, and of two articles ed. with an introduction by H. Walter Schmitz, ixccxxxv1. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R[ogers]. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sebestik, Jan & Antonia Soulez, éds. 1985. Le Cercle de Vienne, doctrines et controverses. Paris: Meridiens Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter. 2007. “Bronislaw Malinowski and Linguistic Pragmatics”. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 31.79–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soulez, Antonia, ed. 1985. Manifestedu Cercle de Vienne et autres écrits. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Stachowiak, Herbert. 1986. Pragmatik. Handbuch des pragmatisches Denkens/ Pragmatics: A handbook of pragmatic thought. 21 vols. Hamburg: F. Meiner.Google Scholar
Stadler, Friedrich. 2001. The Vienna Circle: Studies in the origins, development, and influence of logical empiricism. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
Travis, Charles. 1989. The Uses of Sense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wegener, Philipp. 1885. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens. Halle a.d.S.: Max Niemeyer. (New edition by E. F. K. Koerner with an introduction by Clemens Knobloch. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1991.)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1921. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Annalen der Naturphilosophie. Traduit de l’allemand par C[harles] K[ay] Ogden. Avec une introduction de Bertrand Russell. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1922. [Traduction française par Pierre Klossowski. Paris: Gallimard, 1961.]Google Scholar
. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Ed. by G[ertrude] E[lizabeth] M[argaret] Anscombe. New York & Oxford: Blackwell. [Traduction française Recherches philosophiques par Françoise Dastur, Maurice Elie, Jean-Luc Gautero, Dominique Janicaud & Elisabeth Rigal. Paris: Gallimard, 2004.]Google Scholar
. 1958. The Blue and Brown Books. Ed. by Rush Rhees, Oxford: Blackwell. [Traduction française Le Cahier bleu et le Cahier brun par Marc Goldberg & Jérôme Sackur. Paris: Gallimard, 1996.]Google Scholar
. 1973. Letters to C. K. Ogden with comments on the English translation of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus ed. with an introduction by Georg Hendrik von Wright and an Appendix of Letters by Frank Plumpton Ramsey. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1979. Wittgenstein’s Lectures. Cambridge, 1930–1932. From the Notes of John King and Desmond Lee, ed. by Desmond Lee. Oxford: Blackwell. [Traduction française Les cours de Cambridge 1930–1932 de Elisabeth Rigal. Mauvezin: TER, 1988.]Google Scholar
. 2000. Wittgenstein’s Nachlass: The Bergen electronic edition. CD-ROM. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Fele, Giolo
2016. Language in a Cultural Sociological Perspective. In Handbuch Kultursoziologie, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fele, Giolo
2019. Language in a Cultural Sociological Perspective. In Handbuch Kultursoziologie [Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften, ], ► pp. 471 ff. DOI logo
Godart-Wendling, Béatrice
2014. Emotions: Various “language-games” which open the door 
to grammar*. In Linguistic Approaches to Emotions in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 241], ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.