Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 42:1 (2015) ► pp.63–83

The Missing Meditatio

Leonhard Euler’s (1707–1783) contribution to articulatory phonetics

| Central Washington University,
| Central Washington University,
This work describes the contributions of Leonhard Euler (1707–1783), the 18th-century physicist and mathematician, to the fields of articulatory and experimental phonetics. First the authors provide evidence for Euler’s role in establishing the St. Petersburg Academy prize of 1780. Next, they consider a short and posthumously published work of Euler, the Meditatio de formatione vocum. It is shown that the Meditatio represents an early attempt to compare vowels in several languages, and includes a two-dimensional classification of vowels which anticipates in many ways the International Phonetic Alphabet vowel chart.
Published online: 26 May 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.42.1.04hir
References (37)
References
Abercrombie, David. 1948. “Forgotten Phoneticians.” Transactions of the Philological Society 47:1.1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amman, Johann Conrad. 1700. Dissertatio de loquela, qua non solum vox humana, et loquendi artificium ex originibus suis eruuntur: sed et traduntur media, quibus ii, qui ab incunabilis surdi et muti fuerunt, loquelam adipisci, quique difficulter loquuntur, vitia sua emendare possint. Amsterdam: John Wolters. (English transl. A Dissertation on Speech. London: S. Low, Marston, Low & Searle, 1873.)Google Scholar
Baker, Roger, ed. 2007. Euler Reconsidered. Heber City: Kendrick Press.Google Scholar
Bogolyubov, N. N., G. K. Mikhailov, A. P. Yushkevich, & R. Burns, eds. 2007. Euler and Modern Science. Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Robert E., Lawrence D’Antonio & C. Edward Sandifer, eds. 2007. Euler at 300. Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Robert E. & C. Edward Sandifer, eds. 2007. Leonhard Euler: Life, work, and legacy. Oxford & Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
de Brosses, Charles. 1765. Traité de la formation méchanique des langues et des principes physiques de l’étymologie, Tome premier. Paris: Saillant.Google Scholar
Burney, Charles. 1789. A General History of Music from the Earliest Ages to the Present Period. Volume IV1. London: Payne.Google Scholar
Copineau, A. 1774. Essai synthétique sur l’origine et la formation des langues. Paris: Ruault.Google Scholar
Dodart, Denis. 1700. Mémoires sur les Causes de la voix de l’homme, & de ses differens tons. Paris: Académie Royale des Sciences.Google Scholar
Euler, Leonhard. 1727. Q. F. F. Q. S. Dissertatio physica de sono quam annuente numine divino jussu magnifici et sapientissimi philosophorum ordinis pro vacante professione physica ad d. 18. febr. a. MDCCXXVII. (E2) Basel.Google Scholar
. 1739. Tentamen novae theoriae musicae ex certissismis harmoniae principiis dilucide expositae (E33). St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
. 1768. Lettres à une princesse d’Allemagne: sur divers sujets de physique & de philosophie (E343 and E344. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
. 1843. Lettres à une Princesse d’Allemagne sur divers sujets de physique et de philosophie, précédées de l’éloge d’Euler par Condorcet. Paris: Charpentier.Google Scholar
. 1862a. “Recensio Dissertationis de ventis” (E851). Opera postuma mathematica et physica II, 793–797. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Academy of Sciences. (Repr. in Opera Omnia, Series 2, Volume XXXI1, 365–372. Basel: Birkhäuser, 1996.)Google Scholar
. 1862b. “Meditatio de formatione vocum” (E852). Opera postuma mathemtica et physica II, 798–799. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Academy of Sciences. (Repr. in Opera Omnia, Series 3, Volume I1, 587–590. Basel: Birkhäuser, 1926.)Google Scholar
. 1862c. “Meditatio in experimenta explosione tormentorum nuper instituta” (E853). Opera Postuma II, 800–804. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Academy of Sciences. (Repr. in Opera Omnia, Series 2, Volume XIV1, 468–477. Basel: Birkhäuser, 1922). [A translation of selections from E853 Florian Cajori appears in David Eugene Smith’s A Source Book in Mathematics, 95–99. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1929.]Google Scholar
Euler Archive. [URL]
Firth, J[ohn] R[upert] & B. B. Rogers. 1937. “The Structure of the Chinese Monosyllable in a Hunanese Dialect (Changsha)”. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London 8:4.1055–1074.Google Scholar
Hakfoort, Casper. 1986. Optica in de eeuw van Euler. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2006. Optics in the Age of Euler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hankins, Thomas L. & Robert J. Silverman. 1995. “ Vox Mechanica: The history of speaking machines”. Instruments and the Imagination. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harduin, Alexandre-Xavier. 1760. Dissertation sur les voyelles et sur les consonnes. Amiens & Paris: Lambert.Google Scholar
Juškevič, A. P. & E. Winter. 1976. Die Berliner und Petersburger Akademie der Wissenschaften im Briefwechsel Leonhard Eulers. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Kratzenstein, Christian Gottlieb. 1781. Tentamen resolvendi problema ab Academia Scientiarum Imperiali Petroplitana ad annum 1780 publice problema. Petropoli: Typis Academiae Scientiarum.Google Scholar
Musielak, Dora Euler and the German Princess, submitted. Currently available at [URL]
Nobile, Lucas. 2007. “De Brosses, Jakobson et l’ontogénèse phonologique”. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 29:1.105–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 2011. “Christian Gottlieb Kratzenstein: Pioneer in speech synthesis.” Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS-11 Hong Kong) ed. by Wai-Sum Lee & Eric Zee, 156–159. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Panconcelli-Calzia, Giulio. 1994. Geschichtszahlen der Phonetik (1941), together with Quellenatlas der Phonetik (1940). Ed. with English Introduction by Konrad Koerner. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Accessed 11 Jan. 2015. ProQuest ebrary. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfitzinger, Hartmut R. & Oliver Niebuhr. 2011. “Historical Development of the Phonetic Vowel Systems: The last 400 years”. Proceedings from the Inst. of Phonetics and Digital Speech Processing, 160–163. Kiel: Christian Albrechts University.Google Scholar
Pompino-Marschall, Bernd. 2005. “Remarks on the History of Articulatory-Acoustic Modeling”, ZAS Papers in Linguistics 401.145–159. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Ramsay, Gordon. 2010. “L’Abbé Mical et les têtes parlantes: L’histoire de sa vie, l’histoire de son œuvre”. Actes du 10ème Congrès de la Société Française d’Acoustique, 00–00. Lyon: HAL Archives Ouvertes.Google Scholar
Salmon, Vivian. 1972. The Works of Francis Lodwick: A study of his writings in the intellectual context of the seventeenth century. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sandifer, C. Edward, R. Bradley, L. D’Antonio, eds. 2007. “Euler’s Fourteen Problems”. Euler at 300, 00–00. Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swoboda, Wilhelm. 1891. “Zur Geschichte der Phonetik”. Phonetische Studien 4.1–36.147–182.Google Scholar
Truesdell, Clifford. 1984. An Idiot’s Fugitive Essays on Science. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velázquez, Dolores A. & Pablo A. Lonngi. 2008. “Contribuciónes de Leonhard Euler a la Acústica”. Miscelánea Matemática 461.1–25.Google Scholar