Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 42:1 (2015) ► pp.119137
References (32)
References
Bolinger, Dwight L[eMerton]. 1947a. Review of Pike (1945). Studies in Linguistics 51.69–78.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1947b. Review of Pike (1945). American Speech 221.134–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1949. “Intonation and Analysis”. Word 51.248–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1951. “Intonation: Levels versus configurations”. Word 71.199–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1958. “A Theory of Pitch Accent in English”. Word 141.109–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1972. Intonation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeCamp, David. 1968. “The Current Discrepancy between Theoretical and Applied Linguistics”. TESOL Quarterly 21.3–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz. 1980. “On Stress-Timing in English Phonology”. Lingua 511.187–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Henry A[llan]. 1955. An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston. (2nd ed., 1961.)Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F[rancis]. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huck, Geoffrey J. & John A. Goldsmith. 1995. Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and the deep structure debates. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Insler, Stanley. 2008. “Obituary of Rulon Wells”. The Linguist List, 1 July 2008. [URL]. Accessed 24 Nov. 2014.
Kingdon, Roger. 1958. The Groundwork of English Intonation. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1983. “Levels vs. Configurations, Revisited”. Essays in Honor of Charles F. Hockett ed. by Frederick B. Agard et al., 49–59. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
. 2008 [1 1996]. Intonational Phonology. 2nd ed.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B. Q. 1953. “Question Melodies in American English”. American Speech 281.181–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. 1994. Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America: A social history. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2014. “Getting the Word Out: The early generativists’ multi-pronged efforts to diffuse their ideas”. Language 901.241–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, J. D. & G. F. Arnold. 1961. Intonation of Colloquial English: A practical handbook. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Palmer, Harold E[dward]. 1922. English Intonation, with Systematic Exercises. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Paratore, Angela. 1959. Review of An Intensive Course in English by Robert Lado & Charles C. Fries, 41 vols. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1954–1958). Language 351.354–361.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT. Pike, Kenneth L[ee]. 1945. The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1947a. “Grammatical Prerequisites to Phonemic Analysis”. Word 31.155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1947b. Phonemics: A technique for reducing languages to writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Roach, Peter. 1994. “Conversion between Prosodic Transcription Systems: Standard British and ToBI [Tones and Break Indices]”. Speech Communication 151.91–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trager, George L[eonard]. 1950. Review of Pike (1947b). Language 261.152–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trager, George L. 1964. “The Intonation System of American English”. In Honour of Daniel Jones ed. by David Abercrombie et al., 266–270. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. & Henry Lee Smith. 1957 [1 1951]. An Outline of English Structure. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Wells, Rulon S[eymour]. 1945. “The Pitch Phonemes of English”. Language 211.27–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Rulon S. 1947a. Review of Pike (1945). Language 231.255–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1947b. “Immediate Constituents”. Language 231.81–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar