Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 43:3 (2016) ► pp.343–362

Divided Allegiance

Martinet’s preface to Weinreich’s Languages in Contact (1953)

| University of Edinburgh
Read outside its immediate historical context, Languages in Contact (1953) by Uriel Weinreich (1926–1967), most particularly its Preface by André Martinet (1908–1999), contains statements that can seem contradictory and mystifying. Describing his student Weinreich’s book, Martinet characterises bilingualism as “divided linguistic allegiance”, and uses the metaphor of a battlefield to describe the feelings of language variation experienced by bilinguals – but also by monolinguals, suggesting that the mainstream doctrine of languages as self-contained and unified is nothing more than a useful abstraction. Martinet’s own allegiances were divided between loyalty to his student and to his profession, since his own best-known work tended in the direction of the abstraction. All this was taking place in a febrile atmosphere at Columbia University, as “loyalty investigations” were being implemented by the Dean of Students to root out suspected communists – people thought to have allegiances divided between the two sides of the Iron Curtain. This paper tries to make the curious statements in the Preface and the book proper comprehensible by reading them within these professional and political contexts. It considers too how Martinet and Weinreich conceive of the bilingual brain on the model of two nations within a single state.
Published online: 21 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.43.3.04jos
References (53)
References
Andrews, David R. 1999. Sociocultural Perspectives on Language Change in Diaspora: Soviet immigrants in the United States. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barker, George C. 1954. Review of Weinreich (1953). American Journal of Sociology 591.509–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen, Fergus I. M. Craik & Gigi Luk. 2012. “Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain”. Trends in Cognitive Science 16.4.240–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackie, John Stuart. 1868. On Education. Edinburgh: Edmonston & Douglas.Google Scholar
Chambon, Jean-Pierre & Anne Fryba-Reber. 1995–1996. “‘Sus la draio que condus d’Auro en auro en païs brodo – sur la voie qui conduit de Vienne à Genève’: Lettres et fragments inédits de Jules Ronjat adressés à Charles Bally (1910–1918)”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 491.9–63.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jean-Claude, avec Pierre Encrevé. 2006. Combats pour la linguistique, de Martinet à Kristeva: Essai de dramaturgie épistémologique. Lyons: ENS éditions.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport, Conn. & London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, Lucy. 1978. “Max Weinreich: Scholarship of Yiddish”. The Jewish Presence, 1621. New York & London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2007. “Roman Jakobson and the Two-dollar Bills”. Historiographia Linguitica 34.2/3.435–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Izhac. [1915]. La pensée et la polyglossie: Essai psychologique et didactique. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Falk, Julia S. 2002. Women, Language and Linguistics: Three American stories from the first half of the twentieth century. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. “Diglossia”. Word 151.325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Figueroa, Esther. 1994. Sociolinguistic Metatheory. Oxford: Pergamon; New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Grammont, Maurice. 1902. “Observations sur le langage des enfants”. Mélanges linguistiques offerts à M. Antoine Meillet par ses élèves, 61–82. Paris: C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1955. Review of Weinreich (1953). American Anthropologist n.s. 571.167–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1950a. “Problems of Bilingualism”. Lingua 2/3. 271–290.Google Scholar
. 1950b. “The Analysis of Linguistic Borrowing”. Language 26:2.210–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1954. Review of Weinreich (1953). Language 301.380–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Marvin, Vera Baviskar, Ulrike Kiefer, Robert Neumann, Wolfgang Putschke, Andrew Sunshine & Uriel Weinreich, eds. 1992–2000. The Language and Culture Atlas of Ashkenazic Jewry. 31 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. (Several further volumes are anticipated.)Google Scholar
Hutton, Christopher M. 1999. Linguistics and the Third Reich: Mother-tongue fascism, race and the science of language. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 1989. “Four Models of Linguistic Change”. Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches to Linguistic Variation and Change ed. by Thomas J. Walsh, 147–157. (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, 39.) Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1994. Review of Martinet (1993). Historiographia Linguistica 21.1/2.212–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012a. Saussure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014. “The Wolf in Itself: The uses of enchantment in the development of modern linguistics”. The Making of the Humanities, vol. III1: The modern humanities, ed. by Rens Bod, Jaap Maat & Thijs Weststeijn, 81–95. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. Language, Mind and Body: A conceptual history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Kibbee, Douglas A. 2016. Language and the Law: Linguistic inequality in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Ronald I. 2011. “Uriel Weinreich and the Birth of Modern Contact Linguistics”. Languages in Contact 2010 ed. by Piotr P. Chruszczewski & Zdzislaw Wąsik, 99–110. Wroclaw: Philological School of Higher Education in Wroclaw Publishing.Google Scholar
King, Robert D. 1988. “The Weinreich Legacy”. The Fifth Annual Avrom-Nokhem Stencl Lecture in Yiddish Studies, delivered before The Sixth Annual Oxford Summer Programme in Yiddish Language and Literature on 17 August 1987. On-line at [URL]
Kloss, Heinz. 1952. Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen von 1800 bis 1950. Munich: Pohl.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 2002. Toward a History of American Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change”. Word 191.273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1991. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes: Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Leopold, Werner F. 1939–1949. Speech Development of a Bilingual Child: A linguist’s record. 41 vols. Vols I & II1: Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University; vols III & IV1: Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Linton, Ralph. 1943. “Nativistic Movements”. American Anthropologist n.s.451.230–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdtke, Helmut. 1953. Review of Weinreich (1953). Boletim de Filologia 141.355–358.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1968. “Necrology – Uriel Weinreich, Jakob Jud’s last student”. Romance Philology 22.1.128–132.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1945. La prononciation du français contemporain. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques: Traité de phonologie diachronique. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
. 1993. Mémoires d’un linguiste: Vivre les langues. Entretiens avec Geroges Kassaï et avec la collaboration de Jeanne Martinet. Paris: Quai Voltaire.Google Scholar
Piroch, Goldie. 1955. Review of Weinreich (1953). Language Learning 61.80–83.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1953. Review of Weinreich (1953). Modern Language Journal 371.429–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ronjat, Jules. 1913. Le développement du langage observé chez un enfant bilingue. Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. By Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger. Paris & Lausanne: Payot. (2nd ed. 1922, subsequent eds substantially unchanged).Google Scholar
. 1922. Recueil des publications scientifiques de Ferdinand de Saussure. [Ed. by Charles Bally & Léopold Gautier.] Geneva: Sonor; Lausanne: Payot; Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Schrecker, Ellen. 1994. The Age of McCarthyism. New York: Bedford Books.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Stephen. 1954. Review of Weinreich (1953). Romance Philology 81.209–211.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1949. College Yiddish: An introduction to the Yiddish language and to Jewish life and culture. Preface by Roman Jakobson. New York: Yiddish Scientific Institute.Google Scholar
. 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and problems. Preface by Andre Martinet. New York: Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
. 1954. “Is a Structural Dialectology Possible?”. Word 101.388–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011 [1951]. Languages in Contact: French, German, and Romansh in twentieth-century Switzerland. Introduction and notes by Ronald I. Kim & William Labov. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [First publication of Weinreich’s Ph.D. thesis, Research Problems in Bilingualism with Special Reference to Switzerland, Columbia University, 1951.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change”. Directions for Historical Linguistics ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Hutton, Christopher
2022. Ghosts of the past: the uncanny presence of Nazi sources in post-war sociolinguistics. Language & History 65:3 ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Joseph, John E.
2021. Identity Construction. In English and Spanish, ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Danae Perez, Marianne Hundt, Johannes Kabatek & Daniel Schreier
2021. English and Spanish, DOI logo
Joseph, John E., Gijsbert Rutten & Rik Vosters
2020. Dialect, language, nation: 50 years on. Language Policy 19:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Wilkinson, Erin & Jill P. Morford
2020. How Bilingualism Contributes to Healthy Development in Deaf Children: A Public Health Perspective. Maternal and Child Health Journal 24:11 ► pp. 1330 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.