Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 43:3 (2016) ► pp.343–362

Divided Allegiance

Martinet’s preface to Weinreich’s Languages in Contact (1953)

| University of Edinburgh

Read outside its immediate historical context, Languages in Contact (1953) by Uriel Weinreich (1926–1967), most particularly its Preface by André Martinet (1908–1999), contains statements that can seem contradictory and mystifying. Describing his student Weinreich’s book, Martinet characterises bilingualism as “divided linguistic allegiance”, and uses the metaphor of a battlefield to describe the feelings of language variation experienced by bilinguals – but also by monolinguals, suggesting that the mainstream doctrine of languages as self-contained and unified is nothing more than a useful abstraction. Martinet’s own allegiances were divided between loyalty to his student and to his profession, since his own best-known work tended in the direction of the abstraction. All this was taking place in a febrile atmosphere at Columbia University, as “loyalty investigations” were being implemented by the Dean of Students to root out suspected communists – people thought to have allegiances divided between the two sides of the Iron Curtain. This paper tries to make the curious statements in the Preface and the book proper comprehensible by reading them within these professional and political contexts. It considers too how Martinet and Weinreich conceive of the bilingual brain on the model of two nations within a single state.

Published online: 21 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.43.3.04jos
References (53)
Andrews, David R.
1999 Sociocultural Perspectives on Language Change in Diaspora: Soviet immigrants in the United States. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barker, George C.
1954 Review of Weinreich (1953). American Journal of Sociology 591.509–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen, Fergus I. M. Craik & Gigi Luk
2012 “Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain”. Trends in Cognitive Science 16.4.240–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackie, John Stuart
1868 On Education. Edinburgh: Edmonston & Douglas.Google Scholar
Chambon, Jean-Pierre & Anne Fryba-Reber
1995–1996 “‘Sus la draio que condus d’Auro en auro en païs brodo – sur la voie qui conduit de Vienne à Genève’: Lettres et fragments inédits de Jules Ronjat adressés à Charles Bally (1910–1918)”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 491.9–63.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jean-Claude, avec Pierre Encrevé
2006 Combats pour la linguistique, de Martinet à Kristeva: Essai de dramaturgie épistémologique. Lyons: ENS éditions.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986 Knowledge of Language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport, Conn. & London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, Lucy
1978 “Max Weinreich: Scholarship of Yiddish”. The Jewish Presence, 1621. New York & London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
2007 “Roman Jakobson and the Two-dollar Bills”. Historiographia Linguitica 34.2/3.435–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Izhac
[1915] La pensée et la polyglossie: Essai psychologique et didactique. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Falk, Julia S.
2002 Women, Language and Linguistics: Three American stories from the first half of the twentieth century. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.
1959 “Diglossia”. Word 151.325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Figueroa, Esther
1994 Sociolinguistic Metatheory. Oxford: Pergamon; New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Grammont, Maurice
1902 “Observations sur le langage des enfants”. Mélanges linguistiques offerts à M. Antoine Meillet par ses élèves, 61–82. Paris: C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1955 Review of Weinreich (1953). American Anthropologist n.s. 571.167–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar
1950a “Problems of Bilingualism”. Lingua 2/3. 271–290.Google Scholar
1950b “The Analysis of Linguistic Borrowing”. Language 26:2.210–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1954 Review of Weinreich (1953). Language 301.380–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Marvin, Vera Baviskar, Ulrike Kiefer, Robert Neumann, Wolfgang Putschke, Andrew Sunshine & Uriel Weinreich
eds. 1992–2000 The Language and Culture Atlas of Ashkenazic Jewry. 31 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. (Several further volumes are anticipated.)Google Scholar
Hutton, Christopher M.
1999 Linguistics and the Third Reich: Mother-tongue fascism, race and the science of language. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E.
1989 “Four Models of Linguistic Change”. Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches to Linguistic Variation and Change ed. by Thomas J. Walsh, 147–157. (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, 39.) Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1994 Review of Martinet (1993). Historiographia Linguistica 21.1/2.212–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012a Saussure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014 “The Wolf in Itself: The uses of enchantment in the development of modern linguistics”. The Making of the Humanities, vol. III1: The modern humanities, ed. by Rens Bod, Jaap Maat & Thijs Weststeijn, 81–95. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. Language, Mind and Body: A conceptual history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Kibbee, Douglas A.
2016 Language and the Law: Linguistic inequality in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Ronald I.
2011 “Uriel Weinreich and the Birth of Modern Contact Linguistics”. Languages in Contact 2010 ed. by Piotr P. Chruszczewski & Zdzislaw Wąsik, 99–110. Wroclaw: Philological School of Higher Education in Wroclaw Publishing.Google Scholar
King, Robert D.
1988 “The Weinreich Legacy”. The Fifth Annual Avrom-Nokhem Stencl Lecture in Yiddish Studies, delivered before The Sixth Annual Oxford Summer Programme in Yiddish Language and Literature on 17 August 1987. On-line at [URL]
Kloss, Heinz
1952 Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen von 1800 bis 1950. Munich: Pohl.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
2002 Toward a History of American Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1963 “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change”. Word 191.273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno
1991 Nous n’avons jamais été modernes: Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Leopold, Werner F.
1939–1949 Speech Development of a Bilingual Child: A linguist’s record. 41 vols. Vols I & II1: Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University; vols III & IV1: Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Linton, Ralph
1943 “Nativistic Movements”. American Anthropologist n.s.451.230–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdtke, Helmut
1953 Review of Weinreich (1953). Boletim de Filologia 141.355–358.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1968 “Necrology – Uriel Weinreich, Jakob Jud’s last student”. Romance Philology 22.1.128–132.Google Scholar
Martinet, André
1945 La prononciation du français contemporain. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
1955 Économie des changements phonétiques: Traité de phonologie diachronique. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
1993 Mémoires d’un linguiste: Vivre les langues. Entretiens avec Geroges Kassaï et avec la collaboration de Jeanne Martinet. Paris: Quai Voltaire.Google Scholar
Piroch, Goldie
1955 Review of Weinreich (1953). Language Learning 61.80–83.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst
1953 Review of Weinreich (1953). Modern Language Journal 371.429–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ronjat, Jules
1913 Le développement du langage observé chez un enfant bilingue. Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916 Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. By Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger. Paris & Lausanne: Payot. (2nd ed. 1922, subsequent eds substantially unchanged).Google Scholar
1922 Recueil des publications scientifiques de Ferdinand de Saussure. [Ed. by Charles Bally & Léopold Gautier.] Geneva: Sonor; Lausanne: Payot; Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Schrecker, Ellen
1994 The Age of McCarthyism. New York: Bedford Books.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Stephen
1954 Review of Weinreich (1953). Romance Philology 81.209–211.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1949 College Yiddish: An introduction to the Yiddish language and to Jewish life and culture. Preface by Roman Jakobson. New York: Yiddish Scientific Institute.Google Scholar
1953 Languages in Contact: Findings and problems. Preface by Andre Martinet. New York: Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
1954 “Is a Structural Dialectology Possible?”. Word 101.388–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 [1951] Languages in Contact: French, German, and Romansh in twentieth-century Switzerland. Introduction and notes by Ronald I. Kim & William Labov. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [First publication of Weinreich’s Ph.D. thesis, Research Problems in Bilingualism with Special Reference to Switzerland, Columbia University 1951.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog
1968 “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change”. Directions for Historical Linguistics ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by 5 other publications

Hutton, Christopher
2022. Ghosts of the past: the uncanny presence of Nazi sources in post-war sociolinguistics. Language & History 65:3 ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Joseph, John E.
2021. Identity Construction. In English and Spanish, ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Danae Perez, Marianne Hundt, Johannes Kabatek & Daniel Schreier
2021. English and Spanish, DOI logo
Joseph, John E., Gijsbert Rutten & Rik Vosters
2020. Dialect, language, nation: 50 years on. Language Policy 19:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Wilkinson, Erin & Jill P. Morford
2020. How Bilingualism Contributes to Healthy Development in Deaf Children: A Public Health Perspective. Maternal and Child Health Journal 24:11 ► pp. 1330 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.