Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 44:1 (2017) ► pp.47–71

Ludwig Noiré and the Debate on Language Origins in the 19th Century

| Paris 3 – Sorbonne Nouvelle | Sapienza – Università di Roma
Among the scholars who tackled the topic of language origins in the 19th century, the German philosopher Ludwig Noiré (1829–1889) deserves special mention. To him, the unique sociability of humans implies cooperation and cooperation in turn involves language. Remarkably, Noiré’s theory deeply influenced the debate on language origins until the 1950s. Before offering some theoretical and historical explanations for the enduring influence of Noiré’s theory, it is necessary to describe the general features of his theory and the context in which it arose. After dealing with the German-English debate on language origins during the 19th century, a section will be especially devoted to Noiré’s theory of language origins. Finally, a comparison between Noiré’s insights and the naturalistic framework of the 19th century is provided.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The 19th-century debate on language origins
  • 3.The German debate
  • 4.Noiré’s theory of language origins
  • 5.Noiré and the debate on language origins. An overview
  • 6.Conclusions and further perspectives
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 3 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.44.1.02dal
References (110)
References
A. Primary sources
Bogdanov, Aleksandr [Aleksandrovič]. 2015. The Philosophy of Living Experience. Popular outlines. English transl. by D. Rowley. Leiden: Brill. [1st ed., 1913, Filosofiya Živogo Opyta: Populiarnye Očerki. St. Petersburg.]Google Scholar
Bonald, Louis-Gabriel-Ambroise, vicomte de. 1818 [1845]. Oeuvres complètes de M. de Bonald. Tome V: Recherches philosophiques sur les premiers objets des connaissances morales. Bruxelles: Société Nationale.Google Scholar
Borinski, Karl. 1911. Der Ursprung der Sprache. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Buxarin, Nikolaj [Ivanovič]. 1925. Historical Materialism: A system of sociology. New York: International Publishers. (1st ed., Moscow, 1921.)Google Scholar
Bücher, Karl. 1899. Arbeit und Rhythmus. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1980. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. I: Language. English transl. by R. Manheim. London: Yale University Press. [German original: Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Band I: Die Sprache, 1923; Band II: Das mythische Denken, 1925; Band III: Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis, 1929. 1st ed., 1923–1929. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. New ed., 2010.]Google Scholar
Darwin, R. Charles. 1874. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray. (1st ed., ibid., 1871.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delacroix, Henri. 1924. Le langage et la pensée. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
De Laveleye, Émile. 1888. La Péninsule des Balkans: Vienne, Croatie, Bosnie, Serbie, Bulgarie, Roumélie, Turquie, Roumanie. Vol. I1. Paris: F. Alcan. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
Farrar, Frederic William. 1860. An Essay on the Origin of Language, based on modern researches, and especially on the works of M. Renan. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig. 1843. Grundsätze der Philosophie der Zukunft. Zürich & Winterthur: Julius Fröbel.Google Scholar
Foulquié, Paul. 1945. Précis de Philsophie à l’usage des candidats au baccalauréat. Tome I. Psychologie. Paris: Éditions de l’École.Google Scholar
Gehlen, Arnold. 1940. Der Mensch, seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt. Berlin: Junker & Dünnhaupt.Google Scholar
Geiger, Lazarus. 1869. Der Ursprung der Sprache. Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob. 1858 [1851]. Über den Ursprung der Sprache. Aus den Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften vom Jahr 1851. Berlin: F. Dümmler. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1772. Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache welche den von der Königl. Academie der Wissenschaften für das Jahr 1770 gesezten Preis erhalten hat. Berlin: Voß.Google Scholar
Janet, Pierre. 1934. L’intelligence avant le langage. Flammarion: Paris.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language, its nature, development and origin. London: G. Allen & Unwin. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
Mach, Ernst. 1896. Die Prinzipien der Wärmelehre, historisch-kritisch entwickelt. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl & Friedrich Engels. 1956–1990. Marx-Engels-Werke. 441 vols. Berlin: Dietz Verlag. (=MEW.)Google Scholar
Mauthner, Fritz. 1912. Beiträge zu einer Kritik der Sprache II: Zur Sprachwissenschaft. 2. Auflage. 2nd. rev. ed. Stuttgart & Berlin: Cotta.Google Scholar
Müller, Max [Friedrich]. 1887. The Science of Thought. London: Longmans Green and Co. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017. DOI logo
. 1888. Das Denken im Lichte der Sprache. German transl. by Engelbert Schneider. Leipzig: no editor listed. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
. 1899. The Science of Language, founded on lectures delivered at the Royal institution in 1861 and 1863. In two volumes – Vol. I. London: Longmans, Green & Co.. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017
. 1901. Lectures On The Origin And Growth Of Religion. London: Longmans, Green & Co. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
. 1909 [1856]. Comparative Mythology: an Essay. London: Routledge. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
Noiré, Ludwig. 1874. Die Welt als Entwicklung des Geistes. Bausteine zu einer monistischen Weltanshauung. Leipzig: Veit & Co. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
. 1877. Der Ursprung der Sprache. Mainz: Victor von Zabern. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
. 1879a. Max Müller und die Sprach-Philosophie. Mainz: Victor von Zabern. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
. 1879b. Max Müller & the Philosophy of Language. London: Longmans, Green & Co. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
. 1880. Das Werkzeug und seine Bedeutung für die Entwickelungsgeschichte der Menschheit. Mainz. J. Diemer. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
Ombredane, André. 1933. “Le langage”. Nouveau traité de psychologie, Les Associations sensitivo-motrices ed. by Georges Dumas, 363–458. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 2002. Judgement and Reasoning in the child. English translation by M. Warden. London: Taylor & Francis. (Original ed., Le jugement et le raisonnement chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel & Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé, 1924.)Google Scholar
Plexanov, Georgij Valentinovič [Plekhanov, Georgi]. 1976. “Fundamental Problems of Marxism”. Selected Philosophical Works, vol. III1, 117–183. Moscow: Progress Publishers. (1st ed., Moscow, 1907.)Google Scholar
Renan, Ernest. 1848 [1858]. De l'origine du langage. 2nd ed. Paris: Michel-Lévy frères.Google Scholar
Reznikov, Lazar’ Osipovič. 1949. “Langage et Société”. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 61.150–164.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1755. Discours sur l'origine & les fondements de l'inégalité parmi les hommes. Amsterdam: Marc Michel Rey.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich [Wilhelm Joseph von]. 1959. “Vorbemerkungen zu der Frage über den Ursprung der Sprache”. Schellings Werke. 41. Ergänzungsband ed. by M. Schröter, 503–510. München: H. C. Beck.Google Scholar
Schleicher, August. 1848. Zur vergleichenden Sprachengeschichte, (= Sprachver–gleichende Untersuchungen, 1.). Bonn: H. B. Koenig.Google Scholar
. 1853. “Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes”. Allgemeine Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Literatur 31.786–787.Google Scholar
. 1983. Die Sprachen Europas in systematischer Übersicht: Linguistische Untersuchungen (Bonn, 1850). Ed. by Konrad Koerner (= Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics, 1800–1925, 4). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1819. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. 21 vols. Leipzig: Brockhaus. (Repr., Sämtliche Werke, vol. II1 ed. by Arthur Hübscher. Mannheim: F. A. Brockhaus, 1988.)Google Scholar
. 2010. The World as Will and Representation. Vol. I1. Ed. by Judith Norman, Alistar Welchman & Christopher Janaway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann. 1851. Der Ursprung der Sprache, in Zusammenhang mit den letzten Fragen alles Wissens: Eine Darstellung, Kritik und Fortentwicklung der vorzüglichsten Ansichten. Berlin: F. Dümmler. (2nd ed., 1858; 3rd ed. 1877; 4th ed., 1888.)Google Scholar
. 1881. Abriss der Sprachwissenschaft. Erster Teil: Die Sprache im Allgemeinen. 2nd ed. Berlin: F. Dümmler. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
. 1888. Der Ursprung der Sprache, in Zusammenhang mit den letzten Fragen alles Wissens: Eine Darstellung, Kritik und Fortentwicklung der vorzüglichsten Ansichten. Berlin: F. Dümmler. ([URL]) Accessed: 4 Apr. 2017.
Süßmilch, Johann Peter. 1766. Versuch eines Beweises, daß die erste Sprache ihren Ursprung nicht vom Menschen, sondern allein vom Schöpfer erhalten habe, in der academische Versammling vorgelesen und zum Druck übergeben vom Johann Peter Süßmilch, Mitglied der Königl. Preußischen Academie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Buchladen der Realschule.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Hensleigh. 1866. On the Origin of Language. London: N. Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Wright, Chauncey. 1873. “Evolution of Self-Consciousness”. North American Review 116:239.245–310. (Repr., Philosophical discussions by Chauncey Wright ed. by C. E. Norton, 199–266. New York: Lennox Hill, 1877.)Google Scholar
B. Secondary sources
Aarsleff, Hans. 1983. The Study of Language in England, 1780–1860. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Agard, Olivier. 2004. “Georg Simmel et la Völkerpsychologie”. Quand Berlin pensait les peuples: Anthropologie, ethnologie et psychologie (1850–1890) ed. by Céline Trautmann-Waller, 131–148. Paris: CNRS Éditions. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albertz, Rainer. 1989. “Die Frage des Ursprungs der Sprache im Alten Testament”. Joachim Gessinger & Wolfert von Rahden eds., vol. II1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Alter, G. Stephen. 2005. William Dwight Whitney and the Language of Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Darwin and the linguists: The coevolution of mind and language. Part 1: Problematic friends”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 381.573–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Darwin and the Linguists: The coevolution of mind and language. Part 2: The language-thought relationship”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 391.38–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arbib, A. Michael. 2005. Beyond the Mirror: Biology and culture in the evolution of brain and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Auroux, Sylvain. 1984. “Linguistique et anthropologie en France. 1600–1900”. Histoire de l’anthropologie ed. by Britta Rupp-Eisenreich, 291–318. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
. 1989. “La question de l’origine des langues: Ordres et raisons du rejet institutionnel”. Joachim Gessinger & Wolfert von Rahden eds., vol. II1, 122–150.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Introduction Émergence et dominationn de la grammaire comparée”. Histoire des théories linguistiques. 31 vols. ed. by Sylvain Auroux, vol. III1 (= L'hégémonie du comparatisme), 9–21. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Baggioni, Daniel. 1986. Langue et langage dans la linguistique européenne (1876–1933). 31 vols. Doctoral dissertation. Aix-en-Provence: Aix-Marseille 1.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Fréderic. 2002. L’anthropologie soviétiques des années 20–30: Configuration d’une rupture. Bordeaux: PUB.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 2009. Adam’s Tongue. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bourdier, Franck. 1978. “Les recherches de Renan sur l’origine de la parole (1841–1885)”. Cahiers du cercle E. Renan 1071.138–170.Google Scholar
Brandist, Craig, Chown, Katja, eds. 2011. Politics and the Theory of Language in the URSS 1917–1938. The Birth of Sociological Linguistics. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1999. “Motivation, conventionalization, and arbitrariness in the origin of language”. The Origins of Language: What nonhuman primates can tell us ed. by Barbara J. King, 307–350. Santa Fe: School for American Research Press.Google Scholar
Craig, T. Christy. 1983. Uniformitarianism in Linguistics. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 31.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Christy, T. Craig. 1989. “Reflex Sounds and the Experimental Manifold: Steinthal on the origin of language”. Joachim Gessinger & Wolfert von Rahden eds., vol. I1, 523–547.Google Scholar
Čugunnikov, Sergej [Tchougounnikov, Serguei]. 2005. “Les paléontologues du langage avant et après Marr”. Cahiers de l’ILSL 201.295–310. Lausanne.Google Scholar
De Palo, Marina. 2005. “De Brosses e Leibniz: Un modello di naturalismo linguistico”. Linguaggio, mente, conoscenza. Intorno a Leibniz ed. by Stefano Gensini, 87–120. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Desmet, Piet. 1996. La linguistique naturaliste en France. (1867–1922): Nature, origine et évolution du langage. Leuven & Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Dowling, Linda. 1982. “Victorian Oxford and the Science of Language”. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 97:2.160–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferretti, Francesco & Ines Adornetti. 2012. Dalla comunicazione al linguaggio: Scimmie, ominidi e umani in una prospettiva darwiniana. Milano: Mondadori Università.Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia. 1973. “Monboddo: Antropologia e linguistica”. Herder – Monboddo. Linguaggio e società ed. by Nicolao Merker & Lia Formigari, 49–66. Roma & Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
. 1977. La logica del pensiero vivente: Il linguaggio nella filosofia della Romantik. Roma & Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
. 2013. “L’origine del linguaggio: Ricognizioni storiche e valenze epistemologiche”. Sull’origine del linguaggio e delle lingue storico-naturali: Un confronto fra linguisti e non linguisti Convegno interannuale 2012 ed. by Emanuele Banfi, 13–22. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Björn Peter. 2003. How Homo Became Sapiens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gauger, Hans-Martin. 1981. “Einleitung. Die romanische Sprachwissenschaft: Gegenstand, Aufgabe, Entstehung, Vorgeschichte, Geschichte”. Einführung in die romanische Sprachwissenschaft ed by Hans-Martin Gauger, Wulf Oesterreicher & Rudolf Windisch, 1–96. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Vor- oder Frühgeschichte?”. Zur Geschichte der Grammatiken romanischer Sprachen. Romanistisches Kolloquium IV ed. by Wolfgang Dahmen, Günter Holtus & Johannes Kramer, 23–39. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Gensini, Stefano. 1991. Il naturale e il simbolico: Saggio su Leibniz. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Epicureanism and Naturalism in the Philosophy of Language from Humanism to the Enlightenment”. Sprachtheorien der Neuzeit I: Der epistemologische Kontext neuzeitlicher Sprach- und Grammatiktheorien (= Geschichte der Sprachtheorie, 4) ed. by Peter Schmitter, 44–92. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Darwin e il dibattito linguistico coevo”. Paradigmi 24.2.47–66.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Darwin e l’origine del linguaggio: Fra storia naturale e teoria”. Stefano Gensini & Sergio Bucchi, eds. 20141.57–76.Google Scholar
Gensini, Stefano & Sergio Bucchi, eds. Darwiniana: Evoluzione e comunicazion: Dai vermi all’intelligenza artificiale. Pisa: ETS.
Gessinger, Joachim & Wolfert von Rahden, eds. 1989. Theorien vom Ursprung der Sprache. 21 vols. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gipper, Helmut & Peter Schmitter. 1985. Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachphilosophie im Zeitalter der Romantik: Ein Beitrag zur Historiographie der Linguistik. 2. verbesserte Auflage. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Haßler, Gerda & Cordula Neis. 2009. Lexikon sprachtheoretischer Grundbegriffe des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewes, W. Gordon. 1978. “The Phylogeny of Sign Language”. Sign Language and the Deaf: Psychological, linguistic, and sociological perspectives ed by. I. M. Schlesinger & Lila Namir, 11–56. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knobloch, Clemens. 1988. Geschichte der psychologischen Sprachauffassung in Deutschland von 1850 bis 1920 (= Reihe Germanistische Linguistik, 86). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knoll, Elizabeth. 1986. “The Science of Language and the Evolution of Mind: Max Müller’s quarrel with Darwinism”. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Science 21.3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 1983. “Introductory Article: The Schleicherian paradigm in linguistics”. Schleicher 19831: xxiii–lxxxi.Google Scholar
Maher, J. Peter. 1983. “Introduction”. Linguistics and Evolutionary Theory. Three essays by August Schleicher, Ernst Haeckel and Wilhelm Bleek. With an introduction by J .P. Maher ed. by Konrad Koerner (= Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics, 1800–1925, 6), xvii–xxxii. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marino, Mario. 2008. Da Gehlen a Herder: Origine del linguaggio e ricezione di Herder nel pensiero antropologico tedesco. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 1996. La linguistica dell'Ottocento. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Naumann, Bernd, Frans Plank & Gottfried Hofbauer, eds. 1992. Language and Earth: elective affinities between the emerging sciences of linguistics and geology. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 66.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oesterreicher, Wulf. 1986. “Ère Française et Deutsche Bewegung. Les idéologues, l'historicité du langage et la naissance de la linguistique”. Les Idéologues: Sémiotique, théories et politiques linguistiques pendant la Révolution française. Proceedings of the Conference, held at Berlin, October 1983 ed. by Winfried Busse & Jürgen Trabant, 97–143. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osvath, Peter & Björn Peter Gärdenfors. 2005. “Quand les hommes inventèrent l’avenir”. Les grands dossiers des sciences humaines 121.58–63.Google Scholar
Pasqua Mocerino, Roberta. 2014. “L’evoluzione del linguaggio nella filosofia di Chauncey Wright”. Stefano Gensini & Sergio Bucchi, eds. 20141.95–112.Google Scholar
Pénisson, Pierre. 1998. “Heymann Steinthal et la psychologie linguistique des peuples”. Revue germanique internationale. ([URL]) Accessed: 3 March 2016. DOI logo
Piattelli, Michela. 2014. “Una fonte di Darwin: Hensleigh Wedgwood e l’origine del linguaggio”. Stefano Gensini & Sergio Bucchi, eds. 20141.77–94.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean. 2000. “Le paradigme historique et la grammaire comparée: La révolution morphologique”. Histoire des théories linguistiques, vol. III: L'hégémonie du comparatisme ed. by Sylvain Auroux, 139–154. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Hartmut. 1989. “Zum Metapherngebrauch in deutschen sprachwissenschaftlichen Texten des 19. Jahrhunderts”. Europäische Sprachwissenschaft um 1800 ed. by Brigitte Schlieben-Lange, Hans-Dieter Dräxler, Franz-Josef Knapstein, Elisabeth Volck-Duffy & Isabel Zollna, vol. I1, 203–227. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Sériot, Patrick. 1986. “La glottogénèse dans la linguistique historiciste en URSS (d’une linguistique du mot à une linguistique du nom)”. Travaux du Cercle linguistique d’Aix-en-Provence 41.147–177.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Si Vico avait lu Engels, il s’appellerait Nicolas Marr”. Cahiers de l’ILSL 201.227–254. Lausanne.Google Scholar
Smith, G. Michael. 1998. Language and Power in the Creation of the URSS (1917–1953). Berlin & New York: Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Spelke, S. Elizabeth. 1990. “Principles of Object Perception”. Cognitive Science 14:1.29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stout, Dietrich, Nicholas Toth, Kathy Schic, & Thierry Chaminade. 2008. “Neural Correlates of Early Stone Age Toolmaking: Technology, language and cognition in human evolution”. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society [of Great Britain] 3631.1939–1949. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taub, Liba. 1993. “Evolutionary Ideas and ‘Empirical’ Methods: The analogy between language and species in works by Lyell and Schleicher”. The British Journal for the History of Science 26:2.171–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Lawrence. 1957. The Linguistic Ideas of N. Ia. Marr. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne & Henrike Moll. 2005. “Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition”. Behavioural and Brain Science 28:5.675–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velmezova, Ekaterina. 2007. “V. N. Volochinov et N. Ya. Marr sur les origines du langage”. Slavica Occitania 251.385–398.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Rates, Bruno B.
2022. Linguistic Naturalism and Anti-Naturalism in Bergson’s Course L’Idée de Temps: Language, Society, and Life. Bergsoniana :2 DOI logo
Schlaudt, Oliver
2022. Exaptation in the Co-evolution of Technology and Mind: New Perspectives from Some Old Literature. Philosophy & Technology 35:2 DOI logo
D’Alonzo, Jacopo
2020. Les derniers travaux de Trần Đức Thảo sur l’origine du langage et de la conscience (1975-1991). Les Recherches anthropologiques. Histoire Épistémologie Langage :42-2 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.