Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 5:3 (1978) ► pp.275288
References (28)
References
Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1954. “The Strategy of Phonemics”. Word 101.197–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1959. The Sound Pattern of Russian; a Linguistic and Acoustical Investigation. With an Excursus on the Contextual Variants of the Russian Vowels by Laurence G. Jones. The Hague: Mouton. (2nd ed., 1971.)Google Scholar
Henrici, Gert. 1975. Die Binarismus-Problematik in der neueren Linguistik. Tübingen: Max Niemayer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivić, Pavle. 1965. “Roman Jakobson and the Growth of Phonology”. Linguistics 181.35–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1928. “Proposition au premier congrès international de linguistes”. Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes à la Haye, 33–36. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff. (Repr. in Selected Writings I, 3–6.)Google Scholar
. 1929. Remarques sur l’évolution phonologique du russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves. (= TCLP, 2.) Prague.Google Scholar
. 1931. “Projet de terminologie phonologique standardisée”. TCLP 41.309–23.Google Scholar
. 1938. “Observations sur le classement phonologique des consonnes”. Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 34–41. Ghent: Laboratory of Phonetics of the University. (Repr. in Selected Writings I, 272–79.)Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, C. Gunnar M. Fant, and Morris Halle. 1951. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and their Correlates. Cambridge, Mass. (6th printing, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1965.)Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton. (2nd rev. ed., 1971.)Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1962. Selected Writings I: Phonological Studies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
, with the collaboration of H. Baran, O. Ronen, and Martha Taylor, ed. 1975. N. S. Trubetzkoy’s Letters and Notes. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kilbury, James. 1976. The Development of Morphophonemic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1970. “The Measurement of Phonetic Similarity”. SMIL 61.23–32.Google Scholar
. 1971a. Preliminaries to Linguistic Phonetics. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1971b. “The Limits of Phonology”. Form and Substance: Phonetic and Linguistic Papers Presented to Eli Fischer-Jørgensen. Edited by Louis L. Hammerich, Roman Jakobson, and Eberhard Zwirner, 47–56. Stockholm: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
. 1972. “Phonetic Prerequisites for a Distinctive Feature Theory”. Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre. Edited by Albert Valdman, 273–85. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1975. A Course in Phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Yovanovich.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1964. “Troubetzkoy et le binarisme”. WS1Jb 111.37–41.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, (Prince) Nikolaj Sergeevič. 1929. “Zur allgemeinen Theorie der phonologischen Vokalsysteme”. TCLP 11.39–67.Google Scholar
. 1931. “Die phonologischen Systeme”. TCLP 41.96–116.Google Scholar
. 1935. Anleitung zu phonologischen Beschreibungen. Brno. (2nd ed., Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1958.)Google Scholar
. 1936. “Essai d’une théorie des oppositions phonologiques”. JPsych 331.5–18.Google Scholar
. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. (= TCLP, 7.) Prague. (4th ed., Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1967.)Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef, 1933. “Über die phonologische Interpretation der Diphthonge mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Englischen”. Prague Studies in English 41.87–170.Google Scholar
. 1966. The Linguistic School of Prague: An introduction to its theory and practice. Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
. 1968. “A Note on Trubetzkoy and Phonemic Disjunctions”. FoL 21.160–65.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Patri, Sylvain
1998. Un Problème de Phonologie en 1922. Historiographia Linguistica 25:3  pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Gil, Juana
1989. The binarity hypothesis in phonology: 1938–1985. Historiographia Linguistica 16:1-2  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Eramian, Gregory M.
1988. Edward Sapir and the Prague School. Historiographia Linguistica 15:3  pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Akamatsu, Tsutomu
1986. ‘Mark’ and related notions in Prague School Phonology. Historiographia Linguistica 13:1  pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Viel, Michel
1983. Nouvelles Remarques a Propos De L’Abandon Par Trubetzkoy Des Oppositions Disjointes. Historiographia Linguistica 10:3  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Viel, Michel
2007.  Correspondance avec Roman Jakobson et autres écrits. Par N. S. Troubetzkoy. Historiographia Linguistica 34:1  pp. 980 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.