Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 6:2 (1979) ► pp.149–157

Lucretius on the Origin of Language

| Stockholms Universitet
The Roman poet and philosopher Lucretius (c. 99–55 B.C.) deserves a place in the history of linguistics because of his views on the origin of language. He was the first one to draw the parallel between the sounds of animals and the beginnings of human speech, and the first one to clearly envisage the creation of language as a fact of fundamental importance for the social organization of man. His ideas are related to modern research in the area in an interesting way.
Published online: 1 January 1979
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.6.2.02jan
References (16)
References
Aarsleff, Hans. 1974. “The Tradition of Condillac: The problem of the origin of language in the eighteenth century and the debate in the Berlin Academy before Herder”. Studies in the History of Linguistics ed. by Dell Hymes, 93–156. Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. “An Outline of Language-Origins Theory since the Renaissance”. In Harnad, Steklis & Lancaster, 4–13.Google Scholar
Allen, W. Sydney. 1948. “Ancient Ideas on the Origin and Development of Language”. TPhS 811.35–60.Google Scholar
Bailey, Cyril, ed. 1947. Titi Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Ed. with prolegomena, critical apparatus, translation, and commentary. 31 vols. Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Borst, Arno. 1957. Der Turmbau von Babel: Geschichte der Meinungen über Ursprung und Vielfalt der Sprachen und Völker. Vol. 11. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Cole, Thomas. 1967. Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. (= Philological Monographs published by the American Philological Association, 25.) Ann Arbor, Michigan: Western Reserve University Press.Google Scholar
Chlumska, Eva, and I. Kabrt. 1968. “Quid Lucretius de origine orationis eiusque incrementis censuerit”. Latinitas 161.189–95.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, Johannes Hellfried. 1928. De philosophorum Graecorum sententiis ad loquellae originem pertinentibus capita duo. Diss., Univ. of Leipzig. (Printed, Weida, 1928.)Google Scholar
Giussani, Carlo, ed. 1923–29. T. Lucreti Can De Kerum Natura Libri Sex. Revisione del testo, commento e studi introdutivi. 21 vols. Torino: Chiantore.Google Scholar
Harnard, Stevan R., Horst D. Steklis, and Jane Lancaster, eds. 1976. Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech. (= Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, 280.) New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Marler, Peter. 1975. “On the Origin of Speech from Animal Sounds”. The Role of Speech in Language ed. by James F. Kavanagh and James E. Cutting, 11–37. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Offermann, Helmut. 1972. “Lukrez V 1028–1090”. Rheinisches Museum N.F. 1151.150–156.Google Scholar
Rouse, W. H. D., and Martin Ferguson Smith, eds. 1975. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura with an English Translation by W. H. D. Rouse, revised by Martin Ferguson Smith. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schreyer, Rüdiger. 1978. “Condillac, Mandeville, and the Origin of Language”. HL 51.15–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. 1974. “La pensée de Lucrèce sur l’origine du langage (Drn. V 1019–1090)”. Mnemosyne Ser. 4, 271.337–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Škiljan, D. 1975. “Lucrèce sur le langage”. Latina et Graeca 61.5–10. (Original title in Slovenian).Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Dorothea Frede & Brad Inwood
2005. Language and Learning, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.