The problem discussed in this paper has to do with the relation between our imperfect understanding of God and the words in which we speak of him. Thomas Aquinas had argued that spoken words primarily signify concepts, and as a result he believed that no words could be used to signify or name God more distinctly than our concepts warranted. However, Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and Ockham rejected these claims. They argued that words signified things primarily and that as a result the truth or distinctness of our speech need not be closely related to the truth or distinctness of our understanding. Henry of Ghent focussed on the problem of description. He claimed that because words have a common use, a man could describe an object more truly than his degree of understanding warranted. He also claimed that, in the case of God, we tend to speak less truly than our understanding warrants, because our understanding grasps more about God than can be put into words. Duns Scotus and Ockham focussed on the problem of denotation. They both argued that we can use words to denote God’s essence, even though we cannot understand God’s essence. Like Henry, they used examples which show their awareness that their remarks apply to language in general, and not just to religious language.
2017.
Johann Gerhard's Reception of Thomas Aquinas's
Analogia Entis
. In Aquinas Among the Protestants, ► pp. 109 ff.
Klein, Martin
2023. Metaphors, Dead and Alive. In Metaphysics Through Semantics: The Philosophical Recovery of the Medieval Mind [International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, 242], ► pp. 133 ff.
Panaccio, Claude
2003. Ockham and Locke on Mental Language. In The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400–1700, ► pp. 37 ff.
Panaccio, Claude
2017. Linguistic Externalism and Mental Language in Ockham and Buridan. In Questions on the Soul by John Buridan and Others [Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action, 3], ► pp. 225 ff.
Pasnau, Robert
2009. The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy,
Robert, Aurélien
2017. A Crucial Distinction in William of Ockham’s Philosophy of Mind: Cognitio in se/cognitio in alio. In The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy [Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action, 5], ► pp. 39 ff.
Roques, Magali
2017. Ockham’s Semantics of Real Definitions. In The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy [Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action, 5], ► pp. 95 ff.
Rosier-Catach, Irène
2007. Signification et efficacité : sur les prolongements médiévaux de la théorie augustinienne du signe. Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques Tome 91:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Rosier-Catach, Irène
2017. Understanding as Attending. Semantics, Psychology and Ontology in Peter Abelard. In The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy [Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action, 5], ► pp. 249 ff.
Williams, Thomas
2009. Describing God. In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, ► pp. 749 ff.
Williams, Thomas
2014. Describing god. In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy 2 Volume Set, ► pp. 749 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.