Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 21st Annual Installment
Edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren
[Handbook of Pragmatics 21] 2018
► pp. 173–200

Stance

 | Japan Women’s University, Tokyo
Article outline
  • 1.General overview
  • 2.Forms and functions of stance
    • 2.1Epistemic stance
    • 2.2Affective stance
    • 2.3Stance-displaying devices beyond lexis and grammar
  • 3.The stance triangle
    • 3.1Evaluation
    • 3.2Positioning
    • 3.3Alignment
    • 3.4Previous research on stance alignment
  • 4.Contextualization of stance: The local-global nexus
    • 4.1The local context: Dialogicality and sequentiality
    • 4.2The global context: Indexicality and consequences
  • 5.Summary and implications of stance
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.21.sta2
References (195)
References
Agha, Asif. 2005. “Voice, footing, enregisterment.” Journal of LinguisticAnthropology 15(1): 38–59.Google Scholar
Ahearn, Laura M. 2001. “Language and agency.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 109–137.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology, 2nd edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki. 2007. “On the subjectivity of intensifiers.” Language Sciences 29(4): 554–565.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, Costas Canakis and Bert Cornillie. 2006a.“Introduction.” In Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity, ed. by Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis and Bert Cornillie, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 2006b. Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist, trans. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard and Charles L. Briggs. 1990. “Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1971. “Subjectivity in language.” In Problems in General Linguistics, trans. by Mary E. Meek, 223–230. Coral Gables, FL:University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 2008. “The psycholinguistics of developing text construction.” Journal of Child Language 35(4): 735–771.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2004. Developing Discourse Stance across Adolescence. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 37(2).Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A., Hrafnhildur Ragnarsdóttir and Sven Strömqvist. 2002.“Discourse stance: Written and spoken language.” Written Language and Literacy 5(2): 255–289.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besnier, Niko. 1989. “Literacy and feelings: The encoding of affect in Nukulaelae letters.” Text 9(1): 69–92.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. “Language and affect.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 419–451.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae Atoll.” In Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse, ed. by Jane H. Hill and Judith T. Irvine, 161–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan. 1988. “Adverbial stance types in English.” Discourse Processes 11(1): 1–34.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. “Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect.” Text 9(1): 93–124.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1986. “Intonation and emotion.” Quaderni di Semantica 7: 13–21.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2009. “From stance to style: Gender, interaction, and indexicality in Mexican immigrant youth slang.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 146–170. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2004. “Language and identity.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 369–394. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2006. “From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition.” Language 82(4): 711–733.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1986. “Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 2000. “Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 38–55. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1999. “The socialization of affect in Japanese mother-child conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1397–1421.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Noriko Akatsuka and Susan Strauss. 1997. “Deontic modality and conditionality in discourse: A cross-linguistic study of adult speech to young children.” In Directions in Functional Linguistics, ed. by Akio Kamio, 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2006. “Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(5): 569–595.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan and Douglas Biber. 2000. “Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 56–73. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2008. “On the grammaticalization and (inter)subjectivity of evidential (semi-)auxiliaries in Spanish.” In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, ed. by Elena Seoane and María J. López-Couso, 55–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2012. “On affectivity and preference in responses to rejection.” Text & Talk 32(4): 453–475.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damari, Rebecca R. 2010. “Intertextual stancetaking and the local negotiation of cultural identities by a binational couple.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(5): 609–629.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Stancetaking as Identity Work: The Case of Mixed American Israeli Couples. Ph.D. dissertation. Linguistics Department, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
Dancygier, Barbara and Eve Sweetser (eds). 2012. Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn and Rom Harré. 1990. “Positioning: Conversation and the production of selves.” Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 20: 43–63.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. “An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns.” Language 57: 626–657.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Angela. 2002. “‘Surely you knew!’: Surely as a marker of evidentiality and stance.” Functions of Language 8(2): 251–282.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1986. “Self-evidence and ritual speech.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 313–336. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
2002. “Stance and consequence.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans, LA, November 20–24.
2007. “The stance triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “Towards a dialogic syntax.” Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. and Elise Kärkkäinen. 2012. “Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction.” Text & Talk 32(4): 433–451.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., R. Peter Hobson and Jessica A. Hobson. 2014. “Dialogic resonance and intersubjective engagement in autism.” Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 411–441.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. “Variation and the indexical field.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2011. “Communities of practice: Where language, gender, and power all live.” In Language and Gender: A Reader, 2nd edition, ed. by Jennifer Coates and Pia Pichler, 573–582. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Endo, Tomoko. 2013. “Epistemic stance in Mandarin conversation: The positions and functions of wo juede ‘I think’.” In Chinese Discourse and Interaction: Theory and Practice, ed. by Yuling Pan and Daniel Kádár, 12–34. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. and Stephen C. Levinson. 2006. Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2007a. “Grammatical resources for social purposes: Some aspects of stancetaking in colloquial Indonesian conversation.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 69–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007b. “Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ensink, Titus and Christoph Sauer. 2003a. “Social-functional and cognitive approaches to discourse interpretation: The role of frame and perspective.” In Framing and Perspectivising in Discourse, ed. by Titus Ensink and Christoph Sauer, 1–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 2003b. Framing and Perspectivising in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Field, Margaret. 1997. “The role of factive predicates in the indexicalization of stance: A discourse perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 27(6): 799–814.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. “The case for case reopened.” In Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerrold M. Sadock, 59–81. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan M. 2004. “Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers.” Discourse Studies 6(4): 427–448.Google Scholar
Gardner, Rod. 2001. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam. John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Footing.” Semiotica 25(1–2): 1–29.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. “Audience diversity, participation and interpretation.” Text 6: 283–316.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves.” Text & Talk 26(4/5): 443–461.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. “Interactive footing.” In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt and Rebecca Clift, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007b. “Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities.” Discourse and Society 18(1): 53–73.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1992. “Assessments and the construction of context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 147–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1998. “Games of stance: Conflict and footing in hopscotch.” In Kids Talk: Strategic Language Use in Later Childhood, ed. by Carolyn T. Adger and Susan Hoyle, 23–46. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006. The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status, and Exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. and H. Samy Alim. 2010. “‘Whatever (neck roll, eye roll, teeth suck)’: The situated coproduction of social categories and identities through stancetaking and transmodal stylization.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20(1): 179–194.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., Asta Cekaite and Charles Goodwin. 2012. “Emotion as stance.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 16–41. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. and Charles Goodwin. 2000. “Emotion within situated activity.” In Communication: An Area of Development, ed. by Nancy Budwig, Ina Č. Užgiris and James V. Wertsch, 33–54. Stanford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1977. “Sociocultural knowledge in conversational inference.” In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, ed. by Muriel Saville-Troike, 191–212. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. “Contextualization and understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 1999. “Polyphony and the ‘layering of voices’ in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 31(5): 685–708.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pentti. 2007. “Positioning and alignment as activities of stancetaking in news interviews.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 283–317. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1981. “Text semantics and clause grammar: Some patterns of realization.” In The Seventh LACUS Forum, ed. by James E. Copeland and Philip W. Davis, 31–59. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1990. Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 1989. “‘Sure, sure’: Evidence and affect.” Text 9(1): 27–68.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru. 2011. “Claiming epistemic primacy: Yo-marked assessments in Japanese.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig, 58–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 2002. “‘Oh’-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox and Sandra A. Thompson, 196–224. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 15–38.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Robert and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2007. “Using a corpus to investigate stance quantitatively and qualitatively.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 27–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan and John Sinclair. 2000. “A local grammar of evaluation.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 74–101. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Geoff Thompson (eds). 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.” Discourse Studies 7(2): 173–192.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken and Polly Tse. 2005. “Evaluative ‘that’ constructions: Signaling stance in research abstracts.” Functions of Language 12(1): 39–63.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi and Foong Ha Yap (eds). 2015. Stance-marking and Stance-taking in Asian Languages. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 83.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009a. “Stance in a Corsican school: Institutional and ideological orders and the production of bilingual subjects.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 119–145. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. “Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 3–28. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2009c. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1971. “Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb.” In Roman Jakobson Selected Writings 2: Word and Language, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam and Crispin Thurlow. 2009. “Taking an elitist stance: Ideology and the discursive production of social distinction.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 195–226. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2007. “Linking identity and dialect through stancetaking.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 49–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Stance, style, and the linguistic individual.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 29–52. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity.” Text & Talk 26: 699–731.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “The role of ‘I guess’ in conversational stancetaking.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 183–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012a. “‘I thought it was very interesting’: Conversational formats for taking a stance.” Journal of Pragmatics 44(15): 2194–2210.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. “On digressing with a stance and not seeking a recipient response.” Text & Talk 32(4): 477–502.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise and John W. Du Bois (eds). 2012. Stance, Affect, and Intersubjectivity in Interaction: Sequential and Dialogic Perspectives. Special issue of Text & Talk 32(4).Google Scholar
Keisanen, Tiina. 2007. “Stancetaking as an interactional activity: Challenging the prior speaker.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 253–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. 2001. “Stances of whiteness and hegemony in fraternity men’s discourse.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(1): 101–115.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. “Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 171–194. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul. 2004. “Stance and subjectivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2): 127–150.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1985. “Observations and speculations on subjectivity.” In Iconicity in Syntax, ed. by John Haiman, 109–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva. 2012. “Taking a stance and getting on with it: The form and function of the Finnish finite clausal extraposition construction.” Text & Talk 32(4): 503–524.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 1998. “Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics.” Functions of Language 5(1): 33–56.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Michael. 2008. “The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction.” Language in Society 37(4): 569–592.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “On ‘flip-flopping’: Branded stance-taking in U.S. electoral politics.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(2): 223–248.Google Scholar
. 2012. Discipline and Debate: The Language of Violence in a Tibetan Buddhist Monastery. Berkeley: University of California Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linde, Charlotte. 1997. “Evaluation as linguistic structure and social practice.” In The Construction of Professional Discourse, ed. by Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Per Linell and Bengt Nordberg, 151–172. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. (ed.). 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1981. Language, Meaning and Context. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
. 1994. “Subjecthood and subjectivity.” In Subjecthood and Subjectivity: The Status of the Subject in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Marina Yaguello, 9–17. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Macken-Horarik, Mary and James R. Martin (eds). 2003. Negotiating Heteroglossia: Social Perspectives on Evaluation. Special issue of Text 23(2).Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1977. “Starting points.” Language 53: 152–168.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. “Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 142–175. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003. “Introduction” (in the special issue, Negotiating Heteroglossia: Social Perspectives on Evaluation). Text 23(2): 171–181.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. and Peter R.R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matoesian, Greg. 2005. “Struck by speech revisited: Embodied stance in jurisdictional discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(2): 167–193.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1993. Discourse Modality: Subjectivity, Emotion, and Voice in the Japanese Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance: Narrative Retelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 1993. Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1986. “From feelings to grammar: A Samoan case study.” In Language Socialization across Cultures, ed. by Bambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs, 251–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. Culture and Language Development: Language Acquisition and Language Socialization in a Samoan Village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Indexing gender.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(3): 287–306.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Linguistic resources for socializing humanity.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Steven C. Levinson, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1989. The Pragmatics of Affect. Special issue of Text 9(1).Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin. 1989. “Language has a heart.” Text 9(1): 7–25.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. and Ryoko Suzuki (eds). 2007. Historical Changes in Japanese: With Special Focus on Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2).Google Scholar
Oropeza-Escobar, Minerva. 2011. Represented Discourse, Resonance and Stance in Joking Interaction in Mexican Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth E. 2003. “An analysis of APPRAISAL in childbirth narratives with special consideration of gender and storytelling style.” Text 23(2): 211–237.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Painter, Clare. 2003. “Developing attitude: An ontogenetic perspective on APPRAISAL.” Text 23(2): 183–209.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Joseph S-Y. 2011. “Framing, stance, and affect in Korean metalinguistic discourse.” Pragmatics 21(2): 265–282.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. “Stance, style, and vocal mimicry.” Journal of Pragmatics 53: 84–95.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Joseph S-Y. and Hiroko Takanashi. 2011. “Introduction: Reframing framing: Interaction and the constitution of culture and society.” Pragmatics 21(2): 185–190.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1933. “Three kinds of signs.” In Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce 3: Exact Logic, ed. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, 210–214. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi and Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds). 2012. Emotion in Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features found in preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Precht, Kristen. 2003. “Stance moods in spoken English: Evidentiality and affect in British and American conversation.” Text 23(2): 239–257.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rauniomaa, Mirka. 2003. “Stance accretion.” Paper presented at the Language, Interaction, and Social Organization Research Focus Group, University of California, Santa Barbara, February.
. 2007. “Stance markers in spoken Finnish: Minun mielestä and minusta in assessments.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 221–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reber, Elisabeth. 2012. Affectivity in Interaction: Sound Objects in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocci, Andrea. 2012. “Modality and argumentative discourse relations: A study of the Italian necessity modal ‘dovere’.” Journal of Pragmatics 44(15): 2129–2149.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant. 2003. “Editorial: Evaluating evaluative language” (in the special issue, Negotiating Heteroglossia: Social Perspectives on Evaluation). Text 23(2): 165–170.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheibman, Joanne. 2000. “‘I dunno…’: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of ‘don’t’ in American English conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 105–124.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Subjective and intersubjective uses of generalizations in English conversations.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 111–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1962. Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Shoaps, Robin A. 2004. Morality in Grammar and Discourse: Stance-taking and the Negotiation of Moral Personhood in Sakapultek (Mayan) Wedding Counsels. Ph.D. dissertation. Linguistics Department, University of California, Santa Barbara.
2009. “Moral irony and moral personhood in Sakapultek discourse and culture.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 92–118. New York: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith H. Basso and Henry A. Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
.1985. “Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage and ideology.” In Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Mertz and Richard Parmentier, 219–259. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.” Language and Communication 23: 193–229.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siromaa, Maarit. 2012. “Resonance in conversational second stories: A dialogic resource for stance taking.” Text & Talk 32(4): 525–545.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockburger, Inge Z. 2015. “Stancetaking and the joint construction of zine producer identities in a research interview.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(2): 222–240.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1986. “A matter of prolonged fieldwork: Notes towards a modal grammar of English.” Applied Linguistics 7: 1–25.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szatrowski, Polly. 2007. “Subjectivity, perspective and footing in Japanese co-constructions.” In The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface, ed. by Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski, 313–339. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tainio, Liisa. 2012. “Prosodic imitation as a means of receiving and displaying a critical stance in classroom interaction.” Text & Talk 32(4): 547–568.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takanashi, Hiroko. 2001. “Stance differential in parallelism: Dialogic syntax of argumentation in Japanese.” Pragmatics in 2000: Selected Papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference 2: 570–582.Google Scholar
. 2004. The Interactional Co-construction of Play in Japanese Conversation. Ph.D. dissertation. Linguistics Department, University of California, Santa Barbara.
. 2011. “Complementary stylistic resonance in Japanese play framing.” Pragmatics 21(2): 231–264.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takanashi, Hiroko and Joseph S-Y. Park (eds). 2011. Reframing Framing: Interaction and the Constitution of Culture and Society. Special issue of Pragmatics 21(2).Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (ed.). 1993. Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah and Cynthia Wallat. 1993. “Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview.” In Framing in Discourse, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 57–76. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff and Susan Hunston. 2000. “Evaluation: An introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. “‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account.” Studies in Language 26(1): 125–163.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac. 1991. “A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization 2: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers, ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine, 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. “On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change.” Language 65(1): 31–55.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Bernd Heine. 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization (2 volumes). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin N. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, trans. by Ladislav Matejka and Irwin R. Titunik. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
White, P. R. R. 2003. “Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance.” Text 23(2): 259–284.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan R. 2004. Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Andries, Fien, Katharina Meissl, Clarissa de Vries, Kurt Feyaerts, Bert Oben, Paul Sambre, Myriam Vermeerbergen & Geert Brône
2023. Multimodal stance-taking in interaction—A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Dahaam, Ziyad Ahmed
2023. A Pragmatic Analysis of Stancetaking Towards Facebook Posts in Popular Iraqi Pages. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities 30:1, 1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2023. Stancetaking in motion: stance triangle and double dialogicality. Text & Talk 43:5 ► pp. 575 ff. DOI logo
Takanashi, Hiroko
2020. Chapter 11. Playful naming in playful framing. In Bonding through Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 314], ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Takanashi, Hiroko
2023. The utterance-finaltari siteconstruction in interaction: a general extender as a play stance marker. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.