Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 22nd Annual Installment
Edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren
[Handbook of Pragmatics 22] 2019
► pp. 93114
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2003 “Evidentiality in Tariana.” In Studies in Evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon, 131–164. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2018The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y. and R. M. W. Dixon
(eds.) 2003Studies in Evidentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. A.
1988The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. A. and D`. I. Slobin
1982 “Tense, aspect and modality in the use of Turkish evidential.” In Tense-aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics, ed. by Paul J. Hopper, 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergqvist, H.
2015 “Epistemic marking and multiple perspective: An introduction. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 68(2): 1–19.Google Scholar
2016 “Complex epistemic perspective in Kogi (Arwako).” International Journal of American Linguistics 82(1): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, K.
2018 “Evidentiality: The notion and the term.” In The Oxford Handbook of evidentiality, ed. by A. Y. Aikhenvald, 261–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L. and J. Nichols
(eds.) 1986Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Choi, S.
1991 “Early acquisition of epistemic meaning in Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children.” First Language 11(31): 93–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by J. Bybee and S. Fleischman, 165–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, B.
Courtney, E. H.
1999 “Child acquisition of the Quechua suffix.” Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics. Proceedings from the Second Workshop in American Indigenous Languages. UCSB, 30–41.
Creissels, D.
2008 “Remarks on so-called “conjunct/disjunct” systems.” In Proceedings of Syntax of the World’s Languages III, Berlin, 25–28, September 2008.
Curnow, T. J.
2003 “Nonvolitionality expressed through evidentials.” Studies in Language 27(1): 39–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, S.
1997 “Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information.” Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “The mirative and evidentiality.” Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Still mirative after all these years.” Linguistic Typology 16(3): 529–564.Google Scholar
Dickinson, C.
2000 “Mirativity in Tsafiki.” Studies in Language 24(2): 379–421.
Diewald, G and E. Smirnova
2010aEvidentiality in German. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 2010bLinguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N.
2006 “View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective.” Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 32: 93–120.Google Scholar
Evans, N. H. Bergqvist and L. San Roque
2018 “The grammar of engagement I: Framework and initial exemplification. Language and Cognition 10(1): 110–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faller, M. T.
2002Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Ph.D. dissertation, Palo Alto: Stanford University.
Fitneva, S. A.
2018 “The acquisition of evidentiality.” In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, 185–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Floyd, R.
1999The Structure of Evidential Categories in Wanka Quechua. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Floyd, S. E. Norcliffe and L. San Roque
(eds.) 2018Egophoricity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grunow-Hårsta, K.
2007 “Evidentiality and mirativity in Magar.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2): 151–194.Google Scholar
De Haan, F.
2001 “The place of inference within the evidential system.” International Journal of American Linguistics 67: 193–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K and H. Olbertz
2012 “Didn’t you know? Mirativity does exist!Linguistic Typology 16(3): 487–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, N.
2012 ““Mirativity” does not exist. hdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects.” Linguistic Typology 16(3): 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jalava, L.
2017 “Grammaticalization of modality and evidentiality in Tundra Nenets.” In The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality. A Functional Perspective, ed. by K. Hengeveld, H. Narrog and H. Olbertz, 133–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiefer, F.
1998 “Modality.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J.-O. Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [URL]Google Scholar
Kittilä, S.
2019 “General knowledge as an evidential category.” Linguistics 57(6): 1271–1304.Google Scholar
Landaburu, J.
2007 “La modalisation du savoir en langue andoke (Amazonie colombienne).” In L’énonciation Médiatisée II: Le Traitement Epistémologique de L’information; Illustrations Amérindiennes et Caucasiennes, ed. by Z. Guentchéva and J. Landaburu, 23–47. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
LaPolla, R.
2003A Grammar of Qiang. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, M.
1987 “Viewpoint in Oksapmin.” Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 16: 54–70.Google Scholar
Matsui, T and T. Yamamoto
2013 “Developing sensitivity to the sources of information: Early use of the Japanese quotative particles tte and to in mother-child conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 59: 5–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
1986Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pillow, B. H.
1989 “Early understanding of perception as a source of knowledge.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 47: 116–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plungian, V.
2010 “Types of verbal evidentiality marking: An overview.” In The Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by G. Diewald and E. Smirnova, 15–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Romero-Ménde, R.
2008A Reference Grammar of Ayutla Mixe (Tukyo’m Ayuujk). Ph.D. dissertation, Buffalo: University of New York.
Roulet, E.
1996 “Polyphony.” In Handbook of Pragmatic, ed. by J.-O. Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [URL]Google Scholar
Sandman, E.
2016A Grammar of Wutun. Ph.D. dissertation, Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Sodian, B and H. Wimmer
1987 “Children’s understanding of inference as a source of knowledge.” Child Development 58(2): 424–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, P.
2003 “Evidentiality in Shipibo-Konibo, with a comparative overview of the category in Panoan.” In Studies in Evidentiality, ed. by A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon, 33–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A.
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J., J. Garfield, G.-G. Harper, T. Roeper and M. Speas
2009 “Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics, and cognitive development.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 125: 29–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watters, D. E.
2002A Grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willet, T.
1988 “A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality.” Studies in Language 12: 57–91.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Tollan, Rebecca & Bilge Palaz
2024. What Does That Mean? Complementizers and Epistemic Authority. Open Mind 8  pp. 366 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.