Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 23rd Annual Installment
Edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren
[Handbook of Pragmatics 23] 2020
► pp. 139153
References (53)
References
Barfuss, Th. and Jehle, P. 2017. Antonio Gramsci zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, E. and P. Médard 1996. Dictionnaire étymologique et historique de la language française. Paris: Livre de Poche.Google Scholar
Beck, U. 2000. What is Globalization? Oxford: Polity Press [in German 1997].Google Scholar
Bocock, R. 1986. Hegemony. Chichester, London and New York: Ellis Horwood and Tavistock.Google Scholar
Boothman, D. 2011. “The sources for Gramsci’s concept of hegemony.” In Rethinking Gramsci, ed. by M. E. Green, 55–67. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourlot, K. et al. (eds). 2008. La itala socialismo kaj esperanto. Paris: Sennacieca Asocio Tutmonda (SAT).Google Scholar
Buttigieg, J. A. 1992. “Preface.” In Gramsci, Prison notebooks, Vol. 1, ix–xix. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Christidis, A.-Ph. 1999a. “Η νέα ελληνική γλώσσα και η ιστορία της [Modern Greek and its history].” In Γλώσσα, πολιτική, πολιτισμός [Language, politics, civilisation], ed. by Α-Φ. Χριστίδης, 32–43. Athens: Polis [1996].Google Scholar
(ed.). 1999b. “Strong” and “Weak” Languages in the European Union: Aspects of Linguistic Hegemonism. Thessaloniki: Centre for the Greek Language.Google Scholar
Crehan, K. 2002. Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dendrinos, B. 1992. The EFL Textbook and Ideology. Athens: N. C. Grivas.Google Scholar
Dua, Hans R. 1994. Hegemony of English. Mysore, India: Yashoda.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. 1995. Heathcliff and the Great Hunger: Studies in Irish Culture. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2013. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Abingdon: Routledge [1995]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1992–2007. Prison notebooks [1–8]. 3 Vols. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Guha, R. 1997. Dominance Without Hegemony. History and Power in Colonial India. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haberland, H. 2009. “English – the language of globalism?Rask. Internationalt tidsskrift for sprog og kommunikation (Odense) 30: 17–45.Google Scholar
2010. “Globalisme og hegemonisk tænkning i sprogpolitikken.” In Språkvård och sprogpolitik/Language Planning and Language Policy, ed. by L.-G. Andersson et al., 103–119. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Hall, S. 1988. “Gramsci and Us.” In Antonio Gramsci: Critical Assessments of Leading Political Philosophers, Vol. 4: Contemporary Applications, ed. by J. Martin, 227–238. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harrell, S. 1993. “Linguistics and hegemony in China.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 103: 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haug, W. F. 2004. “Hegemonie.” In Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus, Band 6/I, 1–25. Hamburg: Argument-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2019. Lectures on the Philosophy of World History, Volume I, ed. by R. F. Brown and P. C. Hodgson. Oxford: Oxford University Press [1822–1823].Google Scholar
Horst, C. and T. Gitz‐Johansen. 2010. “Education of ethnic minority children in Denmark: monocultural hegemony and counter positions.” Intercultural Education 21: 137–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ives, P. 2004. Language and Hegemony in Gramsci. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Jehle, P. 1994. “Alltagsverstand.” In Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus, Band 1, 162–167. Hamburg: Argument-Verlag.Google Scholar
Karrebæk, M. S., L. M. Madsen and J. S. Møller. 2015. “Introduction.” In Everyday Languaging: Collaborative Research on the Language Use of Children and Youth, ed. by L. M. Madsen, M. S. Karrebæk and J. S. Møller, 1–18. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasuya, K. 2005. “L’hégémonie linguistique – pouvoir organisateur du ‘consentement spontané’.” In Impérialismes linguistiques hier et aujourd’hui. Actes de colloque franco-japonais de Tôkyô, novembre 1999, ed. by L.-J. Calvet and P. Griolet, 55–69. Aix-en-Provence: ÉDISUD.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and Ch. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Recasting Marxism: Hegemony and new political movements.” In Antonio Gramsci. Critical assessments of leading political philosophers, Vol. 4: Contemporary Applications, ed. by J. Martin, 135–153. London: Routledge [1982].Google Scholar
Lo Piparo, F. 1979. Lingua, intellettuali, egemonia in Gramsci. Roma and Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Macedo, D., B. Dendrinos and P. Gounari. 2016. Hegemony of English. Abingdon: Routledge [originally Boulder, Col.: Paradigm 2003].Google Scholar
Määttä, S. and S. Pietikäinen. 2014. “Ideology.” Handbook of Pragmatics 18: 1–24.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. B. 2011. “A critical analysis of the historical and contemporary status of minority languages in Zimbabwe.” Current Issues in Language Planning 12 (4): 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary on-line.
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997. “Realities and myths of linguistic imperialism.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 18 (3): 238–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, W. I. 2005. “Gramsci and Globalisation: From nation-state to transnational hegemony.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4): 559–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosiello, L. 1986. “Linguistica e marxismo nel pensiero di Antonio Gramsci.” In The History of Linguistics in Italy, ed. by P. Ramat, H.-J. Niederehe and E. F. K. Koerner, 237–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sève, L. 1980. Une introduction à la philosophie marxiste. Paris: Éditions Sociales.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1996. “Monoglot ‘Standard’ in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony.” In The Matrix of Language: Contemporary Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by D. Brenneis andR. Macauley, 284–306. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Simon, R. 1982. Gramsci’s Political Thought: An Introduction. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Steger, M. B. 2009. Globalism: The New Market Ideology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Thackray, A. et al. 1985. Chemistry in America 1876–1976: Historical Indicators. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. D. 2009. The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony, and Marxism. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thucydides. 1843. “The history of the Grecian war, written by Thucydides, translated by Sir Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury.” In The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury. Vol. VIII and IX, ed. by William Molesworth. London: Bohn.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. 2012. Ideology in Language Use: Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vico, G. 1968. The New Science of Giambattista Vico, revised translation of the third edition, by Th. G. Bergin and M. H. Fisch. Ithaca: Cornell University Press [1744].Google Scholar
Vogl, U. 2018. “Standard language ideology and multilingualism: Results from a survey among European students.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 6 (2): 185–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. 1973. “Base and superstructure in Marxist cultural theory.” New Left Review 82: 3–16.Google Scholar
1976. Keywords: A vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xenophon. 1968. Scripta minora, Translated by E. C. Marchant and G. W. Bowersock. London: Heinemann [1925].Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

[no author supplied]
2023. Bilingualism at the National and International Levels. In Understanding Bilingualism, Bilinguality, and Bilingual Education in an Era of Globalization [Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, ],  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.