Chapter published in:
Handbook of Pragmatics: 23rd Annual Installment
Edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren
[Handbook of Pragmatics 23] 2020
► pp. 221244
References

References

Ameka, Felix K. and Marina Terkourafi
2019 “What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 72–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Apperly, Ian A.
2011Mindreaders: The Cognitive Basis of “Theory of Mind”. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Astington, Janet Wilde
2006 “The developmental interdependence of theory of mind and language.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. by Nicholas J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 179–206. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Bakker, Dik
2011 “Language sampling.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, ed. by Jae Jung Song, 100–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ballmer, Thomas T. and Waltraud Brennenstuhl
1981Speech Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, Alan
1978 “Universal systems of kinship categorization.” African Studies 37: 69–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon
1998 “Without a theory of mind one cannot participate in a conversation.” Cognition 29: 83–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1946/1971 “Relationships of person in the verb.” In Problems in General Linguistics, ed. by Emile Benveniste, 195–204. Coral Gables, Florida: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1987 “Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?Journal of Pragmatics 11: 145–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blythe, Joseph
2009 Doing referring in Murriny Patha conversation . Ph.D. thesis, University of Sydney.
2012 “From passing-gesture to ‘true’ romance: kin-based teasing in Murriny Patha conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 508–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen
1998 “Temporal reference from a radical pragmatics perspective: Why Yucatec does not need to express “after” or “before”.Cognitive Linguistics 9: 239–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1978Universals of language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody, 56–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael G.
1994Inter-Cultural Communication at Work: Discourse Structures across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1994 “Typology.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Manual. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco, Andrew Murphy, Eva Schlachter and Tonjes Veenstra
(eds) 2018Atypical Demonstratives: Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Joseph
1968Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese and Vietnamese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, Eve
2006 “The thought that counts: interactional consequences of variation in cultural theories of meaning.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. by Nicholas J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 259–278. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
De Kadt, Elizabeth
1998 “The concept of face and its applicability to the Zulu language.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (2): 173–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denny, J. Peter
1978 “Locating the universals in lexical systems for spatial deixis.” Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, Chicago Linguistic Society . April 14–15, 1978, 71–84. Chicago: Chicgo Linguistic Society.
Diessel, Holger
1999Demonstratives: Form, Function and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1980The Languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
1988 “Intention, language and social action in a Samoan context.” Journal of Pragmatics 12: 13–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eades, Diana K.
1982 “You gotta know how to talk …: Information seeking in a south-east Queensland Aboriginal society.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 2: 61–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J.
2019Mainland Southeast Asian languages: A Concise Typological Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. and Tanya Stivers
(eds) 2007Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives (Language, Culture and Cognition, 7). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
1993Space in Danish Sign Language: The Semantics and Morphosyntax of the Use of Space in a Visual Language. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas D. and Stephen C. Levinson
2009 “The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, John R.
1957Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1968 “Linguistic analysis as a study of meaning.” In Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952–1959, ed. by Frank R. Palmer, 12–26. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G.
2005On Bullshit. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frith, Chris and Uta Frith
2005 “Theory of mind.” Current Biology 15 (17): R644–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fukada, Atsushi and Noriko Asato
2004 “Universal politeness theory: application to the use of Japanese honorifics.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1991–2002. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garde, Murray
2013Culture, Interaction and Person Reference in an Australian Language: An Ethnography of Bininj Gunwok Communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Rod
2010 “Question and answer sequences in Garrwa talk.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 30 (4): 423–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F., Sachiko Ide and Yasuhiro Katagiri
2009 “Introduction: towards an emancipatory pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, Birgit
2003 The grammatical coding of postural semantics in Goemai (a West Chadic language of Nigeria) . Ph.D. thesis, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and Catholic University of Nijmegen.
Hill, Clair
2018 Person reference and interaction in Umpila/Kuuku Ya’u narrative . Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University and KU Leuven.
Hockett, Charles F.
1960 “The origin of speech.” Scientific American 203 (3): 88–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
2004 “Implicature.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 3–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. and Gregory Ward
(eds) 2004The Handbook of Pragmatics (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
1989 “Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness.” Multilingua 8 (2–3): 223–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T.
1995 “Honorifics.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M.
2006 “Default interpretations.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. 10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
1996 “Politeness.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Elinor Ochs
1976 “The universality of conversational postulates.” Language in Society 5 (1): 67–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach
1994 “Conversational logic.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, Manual. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983/1992Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 “Three levels of meaning.” In Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honour of Sir John Lyons, ed. by Frank R. Palmer, 90–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 “H. P. Grice on location on Rossel Island.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 25: 210–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Deixis.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 97–121. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006 “On the human “interaction engine”.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. by Nicholas J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
2007 “Optimizing person reference – perspectives from usage on Rossel Island.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 29–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., Sarah Cutfield, Michael J. Dunn, Nicholas J. Enfield and Sérgio Meira
(eds) 2018Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Language Culture and Cognition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. and Nicholas Evans
2010 “Time for a sea-change in linguistics: response to comments on ‘The myth of language univerals’.” Lingua 120: 2733–2758. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
1988 “Reexamination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 12 (4): 403–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989 “Politeness and conversational universals.” Multilingua 8 (2/3): 207–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2004Descriptive motifs and generalizations. In Language Typology: A Functional Perspective, ed. by Alice Marie Claude Caffarel, James R. Martin and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, 537–673. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B.
1989a “Gooniyandi mother-in-law “language”: dialect, register or code?” In Status and Function of Languages and Language Varieties, ed. by U. Ammon, 630–656. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989b “Greenberg on the first person inclusive dual: evidence from some Australian languages.” Studies in Language 13 (2): 437–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990A Functional Grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The Languages of the Kimberley, Western Australia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
in press. Neo-Firthian Approaches to Linguistic Typology. Sheffield: Equinox.
McGregor, William B., Janne Boye Niemelä and Julie Bakken Jepsen
2015 “Danish Sign Language.” In Sign Languages of the World: A Comparative Handbook, ed. by Julie Bakken Jepsen, Goedele De Clerck, Sam Lutalo-Kiingi and William B. McGregor, 195–233. Berlin/Boston and Preston: De Gruyter Mouton and Ishara Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Graham R.
1978 “Pronominal person and number categories in Rembarrnga and Djeebbana.” Oceanic Linguistics 17: 27–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David
2005Gesture & Thought. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P.
1990 “Person deixis in ASL.” In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, ed. by Susan D. Fischer and Patricia Siple, 175–190. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nwoye, Onuigbo
1992 “Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face.” Journal of Pragmatics 18 (4): 309–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1982Grice and universality: A reappraisal. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan and Dik Bakker
1998 “Language sampling.” Linguistic Typology 2 (3): 263–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, M. Z.
1982 “The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy.” Language in Society 11: 203–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1979 “Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
2007 “Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 23–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
2006 “Speech act theory.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. 10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976 “A classification of illocutionary acts.” Language in Society 5: 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Senft, Gunter
2008 “The case: the Trobriand Islanders vs H. P. Grice: Kilivila and the Gricean maxims of quality and manner.” Anthropos 103: 139–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Understanding Pragmatics. London and New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Benjamin
1999Conversation and rationality: the human subject in theories of language use. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rosssano, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon and Stephen C. Levinson
2009 “Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America 106 (26): 10587–10592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Nicholas J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson
2007 “Person reference in interaction.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. by Nicholas J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Todd, Peyton
2009 “Does ASL really have just two grammatical persons?Sign Language Studies 9 (2): 166–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
1999The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2008Origins of Human Communication. Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka
2012An Introduction to Linguistic Typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1985What People Say they do with Words: Prolegomena to an Empirical-conceptual Approach to Linguistic Action. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
1989 “Language on language: toward metapragmatic universals.” IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 3 (2): 1–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “The pragmatic perspective.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. 16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Michael
1997 “Cross cultural communicatin problems in Aboriginal Australia.” North Australia Research Unit Discussion Paper 7/1997 . Canberra: ANU.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1985 “Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 9: 145–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction (Second edition). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David P.
2003Why pointing with the index finger is not a universal (in socio-cultural and semiotic terms). In Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, ed. by Sotaro Kita, 171–215. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P. and Deborah Hill
1995 “When “GOmeans “COME”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs.” Cognitive Linguistics 6: 209–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar
2001 “Deconstructing a classical classification: A typological look at Searle’s concept of illocution type.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 55: 209–225.Google Scholar