Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 26th Annual Installment
Edited by Sigurd D’hondt, Pedro Gras, Mieke Vandenbroucke and Frank Brisard
[Handbook of Pragmatics 26] 2023
► pp. 3–20

Activity types and pragmatic acts

Article outline
  • 1.A bit of history
  • 2.From speech activity to social situation
  • 3.“Indirect” speech acts: Existential problems?
  • 4.From indirect speech acts to pragmatic acts
  • 5.Practs and IPRAs
  • 6.Negotiation in Hebron A. D. 3000: A pragmeme at work
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 16 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.26.act2
References
Allan, Keith
2019 “Pragmemes.” In Handbook of Pragmatics 22 Annual Installment, ed. By Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren, 199–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, Keith, Alessandro Capone and Istvan Kecskes
(eds.) 2016 Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
1971 “Out of the pragmatic waste-basket.” Linguistic Inquiry 2: 401–407.Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro
2010 “Barack Obama’s South Carolina victory speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2964–2977. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capone, Alessandro & Jacob L. Mey
(eds.) 2016 Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul & John Heritage
(eds.) 1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J.
1979 The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F.
1996 “Language form and communicative practice.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, 242–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2010 “Situation bound utterances as pragmatic acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2889–2897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis
1998 “The speech act of incitement”. Journal of Pragmatics 29 (5): 571–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1979 “Activity types and language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399.Google Scholar
[
Reprinted as Levinson, Stephen C. 1992 “Activity types and language.” In Talk at Work, ed. by P. Drew and J. Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L.
1974 “Some practical aspects of a theory of performance.” In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Linguists, ed. by Luigi Heilmann, 111–125. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
1979 “Introduction’ & ‘Zur kritischen Sprachtheorie” [Towards a critical theory of language]. In Pragmalinguistics: Theory and Practice, ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 9–17 & 411–434. The Hague, Paris & New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 ‘Whose Language?’ A Study in Linguistic Pragmatics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 [1993] Pragmatics: An Introduction (Second ed.). Oxford & Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006 [1998] “Adaptability in Human-Computer Interaction.” Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. (Second ed.), ed. By Jacob L. Mey, 7–13. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Niederle, Jindrich, Václav Niederle & Ladislav Varcl
1956 Mluvnice reckého jazyka. Praha: Státní Pedagogické Nakladelství.Google Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko
2016 “Austin’s Speech Acts and Mey’s Pragmemes.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by Keith Allan et al. 2016: 335–350. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolaj S.
1939 Grundzüge der Phonologie (Fundamentals of Phonology). Prague: Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin V.
1973 Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1985 “Different languages, different cultures, different speech acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 9 (2/3): 145–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 “Cultural scripts: A new approach to cultural analysis and cross-cultural communication.”. In Pragmatics and Language Learning Monographs, ed. by Martin Pütz, 5: 1–14.Google Scholar
2003 [1991] Cross-Cultural Pragmatics; The Semantics of Human Interaction (Second ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1922 [1921] Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar