Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 26th Annual Installment
Edited by Sigurd D’hondt, Pedro Gras, Mieke Vandenbroucke and Frank Brisard
[Handbook of Pragmatics 26] 2023
► pp. 67–93

Directives (with a special emphasis on requests)

 | KU Leuven
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.What is a directive?
    • 2.1Definitions in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions
    • 2.2Definitions in terms of graded membership
    • 2.3Provisional conclusion
  • 3.Subtypes of directives
    • 3.1Definitions in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions
    • 3.2Definitions in terms of graded membership
    • 3.3Provisional conclusion
  • 4.Directives as face-threatening speech acts
  • 5.Requests and pre-requests
  • 6.Requests as speech events
  • 7.The social effectiveness of directives
  • 8.Conclusion, recent developments and future directions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.26.dir1
References (63)
References
Alston, William P. 2000. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Brian. 2014. “Speech acts: Natural or normative kinds? The case of assertion.” Mind and Language 29: 336–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bara, Bruno G., and Maurizio Tirassa. 2000. “Neuropragmatics: Brain and communication.” Brain and Language 71: 10–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds). 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Boux, Isabella, Rosario Tomasello, Luigi Grisoni and Friedemann Pulvermüller. 2021. “Brain signatures predict communicative function of speech production in interaction.” Cortex 135: 127–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, Jonathan, Nikos Vergis, Xiaoming Jiang and Marc D. Pell. 2018. “The sound of im/politeness.” Speech Communication 102: 39–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2014. “Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 55–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990–present. Available online at [URL]
Decock, Sofie, and llse Depraetere. 2018. “(In)directness and complaints: A reassessment.” Journal of Pragmatics 132: 33–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse, Sofie Decock and Nicolas Ruytenbeek. 2021. “Linguistic (in)directness in Twitter complaints : A contrastive analysis of railway complaint interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 171: 215–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egorova, Natalia, Friedemann Pulvermüller and Yury Shtyrov. 2014. “Neural dynamics of speech act comprehension: An MEG study of naming and requesting.” Brain Topography 27: 375–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2014. “Human agency and the infrastructure for requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 35–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francik, Ellen P., and Herbert H. Clark. 1985. “How to make requests that overcome obstacles to compliance.” Journal of Memory and Language 24: 560–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H. 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Freytag, Vera. 2020. Exploring Politeness in Business Emails: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1986. “What makes some indirect speech acts conventional?” Journal of Memory and Language 25: 181–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “Is a general theory of utterance interpretation really possible? Insights from the study of figurative language.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28: 19–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1957. “Meaning.” Philosophical Review 66: 377–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1972. “Models of the interaction of language and social life.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans, and Barbara Partee. 1995. “Prototype theory and compositionality.” Cognition 57: 129–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail. 2009. “Illocutionary forces and what is said.” Mind and Language 24: 122–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1992. “Activity types and language.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Interrogative intimations: On a possible social economics of interrogatives.” In Questions: Formal, Functional, and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 11–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Beth, and Joyce Neu. 2006. “My grade’s too low: The speech act set of complaining.” In Speech Acts Across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, ed. by Susan M. Gass and Joyce Neu, 191–216. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., Sabine Tan and Marissa, K. L. E. 2014. “Multimodal pragmatics.” In Pragmatics of Discourse, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Barron, 239–268. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olshtain, Elite, and Liora Weinbach. 1993. “Interlanguage features of the speech act of complaining.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. by Gabriele Kasper and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, 108–122. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez Hernández, Lorena. 2013. “Illocutionary constructions: (Multiple source)-in-target metonymies, illocutionary ICMs, and specification links.” Language and Communication 33: 128–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Hernández, Lorena, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza. 2002. “Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 259–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Michael. 1979. “The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 164–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rohrer, Tim. 2007. “Embodiment and experientialism.” In Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 25–47. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas. 2017a. “The comprehension of indirect requests: Previous work and future directions.” In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line, ed. by Ilse Depraetere and Raphael Salkie, 293–322. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. The Mechanics of Indirectness: A Case Study of Directive Speech Acts. PhD dissertation, Université libre de Bruxelles.
. 2019. “Lexical and morpho-syntactic modification of student requests: An empirical contribution to the study of (im)politeness in French e-mail speech acts.” Lexique 24: 29–47.Google Scholar
. 2021. Indirect Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas, Marie Verschraegen and Sofie Decock. 2021. “Exploring the impact of platforms’ affordances on the expression of negativity in online hotel reviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 186: 289–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, vol. 1., ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1980. “Preliminaries to preliminaries: ‘Can I ask you a question?’” Sociological Inquiry 50: 104–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975. “Indirect speech acts.” In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. “Common ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Rosario. 2023. “Linguistic signs in action: The neuropragmatics of speech acts.” Brain and Language 236: 105203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Rosario, Luigi Grisoni, Isabella Boux, Daniela Sammler and Friedemann Pulvermüller. 2022. “Instantaneous neural processing of communicative functions conveyed by speech prosody.” Cerebral Cortex 32: 4885–4901. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trivers, Robert L. 1971. “The evolution of reciprocal altruism.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints, and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trott, Sean, Stefanie Reed, Dan Kaliblotzky, Victor Ferreira and Benjamin Bergen. 2023. “The role of prosody in disambiguating English indirect requests.” Language and Speech 66: 118–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Ackeren, Markus J., Daniel Casasanto, Harold Bekkering, Peter Hagoort and Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer. 2012. “Pragmatics in action: Indirect requests engage theory of mind areas and the cortical motor network.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24: 2237–2247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel. 1990. Meaning and Speech Acts, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vásquez, Camila. 2011. “Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1707–1717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, Traci. 2013. “Requests.” In Handbook of Pragmatics: Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. by Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner, 445–466. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg. 2016. Requesting Responsibility: The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2024. Indirectness. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.