Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 27th Annual Installment
Edited by Mieke Vandenbroucke, Jana Declercq, Frank Brisard and Sigurd D’hondt
[Handbook of Pragmatics 27] 2024
► pp. 153–165

Intervision

| Universiteit Gent,
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Towards a definition
  • 3.Workplaces and intervisions
  • 4.Intervisions throughout a research project
    • 4.1Intervision as a tool at the stage of research design
    • 4.2Intervision as a tool at the stage of data collection and analysis
    • 4.3Intervision as a tool at the stage of research dissemination
  • 5.Concluding thoughts
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (42)
References
Angouri, Jo, and Meredith Marra. 2010. “Corporate meetings as genre: A study of the role of the chair in corporate meeting talk.” Text & Talk 30(6): 615–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “‘OK one last thing for today then’: Constructing identities in corporate meeting talk.” In Constructing Identities at Work, ed. by Jo Angouri and Meredith Marra, 85–100. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antonovsky, Aaron. 1987. Unraveling the Mystery of Health. How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bailey, Ruth, Karen Bell, Wouter Kalle, and Manohar Pawar. 2014. “Restoring meaning to supervision through a peer consultation group in rural Australia.” Journal of Social Work Practice 28(4): 479–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartunek, Jean Marie, and Meryl Reis Louis. 1996. Insider/Outsider Team Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bartunek, Jean Marie, and Sara Lynn Rynes. 2014. “Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships.” Journal of Management 40(5): 1181–1201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellersen, Monique, and Inez Kohlmann. 2016. Intervision: Dialogue Methods in Action Learning. Zeist: Vakmedianet.Google Scholar
Bellersen, Monique. 2022. “The added value of intervision: Its effect on management consultants’ professional practice.” Management Consulting Journal 5 (1): 7–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Budach, Gabriele. 2020. “Collaborative ethnography”. In The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography, ed. by Karin Tusting, 198–210. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, Rosemary, and Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen. 2020. “International refugee law between scholarship and practice.” International Journal of Refugee Law 32 (2): 181–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copland, Fiona, and Angela Creese. 2015. Linguistic Ethnography: Collecting, Analysing and Presenting Data. London: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creese, Angela. 2005. “Mediating allegations of racism in a multiethnic London school: What speech communities and communities of practice can tell us about discourse and power.” In Beyond Communities of Practice, ed. by David Barton and Karin Tusting, 55–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. “Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation.” Annual review of Anthropology 41: 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. “Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice.” Annual Review of Anthropology 21(1): 461–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epprecht, Christoph. 2011. “Intervision: A group-based peer-supervision project by EMCC Switzerland.” In Coaching and Mentoring Supervision: Theory and Practice: The Complete Guide to Best Practice, ed. by Tatiana Bachkirova, Peter Jackson, and David Clutterbuck, 265–272. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Franzenburg, Geert. 2009. “Educational intervision: Theory and practice.” Problems of Education in the 21st Century 13(1): 37–43.Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul. 2005. “Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: From the age of mythology to today’s schools.” In Beyond Communities of Practice, ed. by David Barton and Karin Tusting, 214–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe. 2015. Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, Jürgen, and Michael Meeuwis. 2013. “Away with linguists! Normativity, inequality and metascientific reflexivity in sociolinguistic fieldwork.” Multilingua 32(6): 725–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Deborah, and Maria Stubbe. 2004. “Communication and the reflective practitioner: a shared perspective from sociolinguistics and organisational communication.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14 (2): 185–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Brian. 2017. “Communities of practice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace, ed. by Bernadette Vine, 101–111. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kühl, Wolfgang, and Erich Schäfer. 2019. “Intervision in the context of VUKA-World and new work.” Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching 26: 471–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefstein, Adam, and Mirit Israeli. 2015. “Applying linguistic ethnography to educational practice: Notes on the interaction of academic research and professional sensibilities.” In Linguistic Ethnography: Interdisciplinary Explorations, ed. by Julia Snell, Sara Shaw, and Fiona Copland, 187–206. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maryns, Katrijn, and Marie Jacobs. 2021. “Data constitution and engagement with the field of asylum and migration.” Journal of Pragmatics 178: 146–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron, and Alex Robertson. 2017. “Urban multilingualism and the civic university: A dynamic, non-linear model of participatory research.” Social Inclusion 5(4): 5–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2004. “Communities of practice.” In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes, 526–548. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, and Anna Strycharz. 2013. “Communities of practice.” In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by Jack Chambers and Nathalie Schilling, 428–447. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. “Social network and prestige arguments in sociolinguistics.” In Sociolinguistics Today: International Perspectives, ed. By Kingsley Bolton and Helen Kwok, 146–162. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Palomares, Manuel, and David Poveda. 2010. “Linguistic ethnography and the study of welfare institutions as a flow of social practices: The case of residential child care institutions as paradoxical institutions.” Text & Talk 30(2): 193–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth. 1967. “Etic and emic standpoints for the description of behavior.” In Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior, ed. by Kenneth Pike, 37–72. The Hague: Mouton & Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piller, Ingrid. 2022. “What exactly does an editor do?”. Multilingua, 41(6): 629–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben, Karin Tusting, Janet Maybin, Richard Barwell, Angela Creese, and Lytra Vally. 2004. “UK linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper.” Online: [URL]
Roberts, Celia, and Srikan Sarangi. 1999. “Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: issues of practical relevance for the researcher.” In Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Setting, ed. by Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts, 473–503. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, Mary Beth, and Lourdes Rivera. 2013. “The prickly embrace of engaged scholarship: What it means to do research in an urban secondary (6–12) school.” Tamara Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry 11(4): 67–78.Google Scholar
Staempfli, Adi, and Anna Fairtlough. 2019. “Intervision and professional development: An exploration of a peer-group reflection method in social work education.” The British Journal of Social Work 49 (5): 1254–1273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tietze, Kim-Oliver. 2010. Wirkprozesse und personenbezogene Wirkungen von kollegialer Beratung. Wiesbaden: Verlag füt Sozialwissenschaften. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Baarle, Eva, Laura Hartman, Sven Rooijakkers, Iris Wallenburg, Jan-Willem Weeninck, Roland Bal, and Guy Widdershoven. 2022. “Fostering a just culture in healthcare organizations: experiences in practice.” BMC Health Services Research 22(1): 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Emmerik, Ine. 2012. “Whitespace, intervision and shared agency.” In Pathways of Literacy to Non-violent Life: Shared Leaderships, ed. by Cláudia Múrias and Marijke de Koning, 83–89. Porto: Livpsic.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. “Communities of practice: Learning as a social system.” Systems Thinker, 9(5): 2–3.Google Scholar
. 2011. Communities of Practice: A Brief Introduction, 1–7. [URL]
Wierda, Roelina, and Ronald Marc Barendsen. 2011. “Online intervision to enhance workplace learning for student teachers: Online professional development of student teachers in an international context.” Ubiquitous Learning 3.2: 149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar