Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 195–216

Cognitive science

Article outline
  • 1.Definition
  • 2.History of contributing fields
    • 2.1Philosophy
    • 2.2Artificial intelligence
    • 2.3Psychology
    • 2.4Linguistics
    • 2.5Neuroscience
    • 2.6Current directions
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Methods for investigating behavior
      • 3.1.1Psychological experiments
      • 3.1.2Naturalistic observation and ethnography
      • 3.1.3Linguistic methodologies
      • 3.1.4Eye tracking
    • 3.2Neuroscience techniques
      • 3.2.1Neuropsychology and lesion studies
      • 3.2.2Brain imaging
      • 3.2.3Event-related potentials
    • 3.3Computational techniques
      • 3.3.1Computational modeling
      • 3.3.2Corpus research
  • 4.Issues
    • 4.1The mind–body problem
    • 4.2From genes to behavior
    • 4.3Representation and rationality
  • 5.Cognitive science and pragmatics
    • 5.1Definition
    • 5.2Methods
    • 5.3Issues
    • 5.4Convergent interests
      • 5.4.1World knowledge and cultural knowledge
      • 5.4.2Mappings
      • 5.4.3Conceptual integration
    • 5.5Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.cog5
References (66)
References
Albright, T. D. & H. Neville. 2003. Neurosciences. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (eds.) The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (online). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ballard, D. & M. Hayhoe J. Pelz. 1995. Memory representations in natural tasks. Cognitive Neuroscience 7: 66–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E. S. M. Wilson, A. P. Saygin, F. Dick, M. I. Sereno R. T. Knight & N. F. Dronkers. 2003. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nature Neuroscience 6 (5): 448–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, W. 1998. Representations and cognitive explanations: Assessing the dynamicist’s challenge in cognitive science. Cognitive Science 22: 295–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bookheimer, S. 2002. Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25: 151–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 2001. Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. & M. A. Krych. 2004. Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language 50: 62–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S. 2001. Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Electrophysiology and Pragmatic Language Comprehension. In I. Noveck & D. Sperber (eds.) Experimental Pragmatics: 187–206. Palgrave MacMillan.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crick, F. & C. Koch. 2003. A framework for consciousness. Nature Neuroscience 6: 119–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language [augmented paperback edition]. Cambridge University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. 1992. Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review 99: 572–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. 2003. Hearing Gesture: How our Hands Help us Think. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Z. 2004. The eyes are right when the mouth is wrong. Psychological Science 15: 814–821. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollan, J. D., E. L. Hutchins & D. Kirsh. 2000. Distributed cognition: A new theoretical foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 7 (2): 174–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kanwisher, N. & W. Wojciulik. 2000. Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging. Nature Reviews 1: 91–95.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1998. Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 389–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B. D. J. Barr, J. A. Balin & J. S. Brauner. 2000. Taking perspective in conversation: the role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science 11: 32–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M. G. Ganis & W. L. Thompson. 2003. Mental imagery: against the nihilistic hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 109–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovecses, Z. 1986. Metaphors of anger, pride, and love (Pragmatics and Beyond VII:8). Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Metaphor and the folk understanding of anger. In J. A. Russell & J.-M. Fernández-Dols (eds.) Everyday conceptions of emotion: An introduction to the psychology, anthropology and linguistics of emotion: 48–71 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.  MetBib. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. M. Johnson 1998. Philosophy in the Flesh. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Land, M. F. 1992. Predictable eye-head coordination during driving. Nature 359: 318–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. 1990. Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Macdonald, M. N. Pearlmutter & M. Seidenberg. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101: 676–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M. 1992. How to build a baby II: Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 99: 587–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. The Foundations of Mind: Origins of Conceptual Thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markman, A. & E. Dietrich. 2000. In defense of representation. Cognitive Psychology 40: 138–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. A. & L. Chao. 2001. Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11: 194–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mcculloch, W. S. & W. Pitts. 1943. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5: 115–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mcneill, D. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, A. D. & M. A. Goodale. 1998. The visual brain in action. [précis of A.D. Milner & M.A. Goodale. 1995. The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press.]. Psyche 4(12). Available: [URL].Google Scholar
Newell, A. 1973. You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (ed.) Visual information processing: 283–308. St. Martin’s Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newell, A. & H. Simon. 1965. An example of human chess playing in the light of chess playing programs. In N. Wiener & J. P. Schade (eds.) Progress in biocybernetics vol 2: 19–75. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Norman, D. 2004. Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Noveck, I. A. & D. Sperber. 2004. Experimental pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, G. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. & B. Schieffelin. 1976. Topic as discourse notion. In C. Li (ed.) Subject and topic: 337–384. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Picard, R. W. 2000. Toward Agents that Recognize Emotion. Vivek 13: 3–13.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & S. Garrod. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 169–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. I. & M. E. Raichle. 1994. Images of Mind. Scientific American Books.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. 2003. The Neuroscience of Language: On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinn, N. & D. Holland. 1987. Culture and cognition. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (eds.) Cultural models in language and thought: 3–42. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G. 1996. Motion metaphorized: The case of ‘coming’ and ‘going’. In E. H. Casad (ed.) Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics: 423–58. Mouton de Gruyter.  MetBib. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. Time is space. In B. Smieja & M. Tasch (eds.) Human Contact through Language and Linguistics: 147–66. P. Lang.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K. & S. P. Liversedge. 2004. Visual and linguistic processing in reading. In F. Ferreira & J. Henderson (eds.) Eye Movements and Multimodal Processing. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. 1979. The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought: 284–324. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reitman, W. 1970. What does it take to remember? In D. A. Norman (ed.). Models of human memory Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. C. & M. J. Spivey. 2004. Eye-Tracking: Research areas and applications. In G. Wnek & G. Bowlin (eds.) Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Shankle, W. R. 1998. Developmental patterns in the cytoarchitecture of the human cerebral cortex from birth to six years examined by correspondence analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 4023–4038. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. 1949. A mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 2002. Pragmatics, Modularity, and Mind-Reading. Mind & Language 17: 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squire, L. R. & S. Zola-Morgan. 1988. Memory: Brain Systems and Behavior. Trends in Neuroscience 11: 170–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. 2004. In F. Ferreira & J. Henderson (eds.). Eye Movements and Multimodal Processing. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K., M. J. Spivey-Knowlton, K. M. Eberhard & J. E. Sedivy. 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268: 1632–1634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar