Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis
Article outline
- 1.Definitions
- 2.Historical note
- 3.Principles of CL
- 4.Trends
- 4.1Social Semiotics
- 4.2‘Orders of discourse’ and Foucauldian poststructuralism
- 4.3The socio-cognitive model
- 4.4Discourse-Historical approach
- 4.5Lexicometry
- 4.6“Lesarten” approach
- 5.Conclusion
-
Note
-
References
References (122)
References
Achard, P. 1995. Formation discursive, dialogisme et sociologie. Langages. 117: 82–95. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anthonissen, C. 2001. On the Effectivity of Media Censorship: An Analysis of Linguistic, Paralinguistic and other Communicative Devices used to defy Media Restrictions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Vienna.
Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beneviste, E. 1974 [1966]. Problèmes de linguistique générale (2 vols.). Gallimard.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benke, G. 2000. Diskursanalyse als sozialwissenschaftliche Untersuchungsmethode. SWS Rundschau 2: 140–162.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Billig, M. 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis and the rhetoric of critique. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (eds.) Critical Discourse Analysis: theory and interdisciplinarity: 35–46. Palgrave Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blommaert, J. & J. Verschueren. 1998. The Diversity Debate. Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse. Cambridge University Press.. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonnafous, S. & M. Tournier. 1995. Analyse du discours, lexicométrie, communication et politique. Mots 117: 67–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bourdieu, P. (ed.) 1989. La noblesse d’etat. Editions de Minuit.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brünner, G. & G. Graefen. 1994. Texte und Diskurse. Westdeutscher Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chouliaraki, L. & N. Fairclough1999. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh University Press. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Connerton, P. 1996 [1976]. How Societies Remember. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Courtine, J.-J. 1981. Analyse du discours politique. Langages 62.
van Dijk, T. 1987. Communicating racism. Sage. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, T. 1991. Racism and the press. Routledge. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, T. 1993a. Elite discourse and racism. Sage. . ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, T. 1993b. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society 4(2): 249–283. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, T. 2001. Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin & H. Hamilton (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis: 352–371. Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, T. 2008. Society in Discourse. How Context Controls Text and Talk. CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, T. 2009. ‘Critical Discourse Studies: a sociocognitive approach’. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of CDA: 62–86. Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N. 1985. Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 739–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N1989. Language and power. Longman. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N1992. Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N1993. Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse. Discourse and Society. 4(2): 133–168. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N. 2000. New Labour, New Language? Routledge. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research. Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N. & R. Wodak1997. Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Introduction to Discourse Studies: 258–284. Sage. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N., B. Jessop & A. Sayer. 2002. Critical realism and semiosis. Journal of Critical Realism. 5(1). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fay, B. 1987. Critical Social Science. Polity Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fowler, R., B. Hodge, G. Kress & T. Trew. 1979. Language and control. Routledge & Kegan Paul. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gee, J. 2004. Discourse Analysis. Theory and Method. Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham, P. 2002. Space and cyberspace: On the enclosure of consciousness. In J. Armitage & J. Roberts (eds.) Living With Cyberspace: Technology & Society in the 21st Century: 156–164. The Athlone Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham, P. 2003a. Time, space, and political economy: A history of hype and hypercapitalism. Discurso y Sociedad.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham, P. 2003b. The Digital Dark Ages: New media, new literacies, and socio-political change. Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Groupe De Saint-Cloud. 1982. La Parole syndicale: étude du vocabulaire confédéral des centrales ouvrières françaises (1971–1976). PUF.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Groupe De Saint-Cloud. 1995. Présidentielle: regards sur les discours télévisés. INA-Nathan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Habermas, J. 1967. Erkenntnis und Interesse. Suhrkamp.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. Language as social semiotic. Edward Arnold. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heer et al. (eds.) 2008. The discursive construction of history. Remembering the German Wehrmacht’s war of extermination. Palgrave.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heller, M. 1988. Where do we go from here? In M. Heller (ed.) Codeswitching: 265–272. Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iedema, R. Wodak, R. 1999. Introduction: Organizational discourse and practices. Discourse & Society 10: 15–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jäger, S. 1993. Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einführung. DISS.
Jäger, S. 1999. Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einführung. DISS.
Jäger, S. 2001. Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of critical discourse analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.): 32–62.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Januschek, F. 1992. Rechts-populismus und NS-Anspielungen am Beispiel des österreichischen Politikers Jörg Haider. DISS-Texte. 15.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klemperer, V. 19753 [1947]. LTI. Lingua Tertii Imperii. Die Sprache des Dritten Reiches. Reclam.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G. & T. van Leeuwen. 1990. Reading images. Deakin University Press. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G. & T. van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images. Routledge. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G. & R. Hodge. 1979. Language as ideology. Routledge. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G. 1993. Against arbitrariness. Discourse and Society 4(2): 169–191. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krings, H. et al. (eds.) 1973. Handbuch philosophischer Grundbegriffe. Kösel-Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krzyżanowski, M. 2005. European Identity Wanted! On Discursive Dimensions of the European Convention. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (eds.)New Research Agenda in CDA: Theory and Multidisciplinarity: 137–164. John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krzyżanowski, M. & Wodak,R. 2008. The Politics of Exclusion. The Austrian Case. Transaction Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krzyżanowski, M. & Wodak, R. 2009. ‘Theorising and Analysing Social Change in Central and Eastern Europe: The Contribution of Critical Discourse Analysis’. In A. Galasinska & M., Krzyżanowski (eds.). Discourse and Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe:17–40. Palgrave. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Leeuwen, T. 1993. Genre and field in critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society 4(2): 193–223. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Leeuwen, T. 2009. ‘Discourse as the recontextualisation of social practice: a guide’. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of CDA: 144–161. Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemke, J. 1995. Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. Taylor & Francis. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemke, J. 2000. Multiplying Modalities: Presentational, Orientational and Organizational Meaning. Unpubl. Paper.
Lemke, J. 2001. Discursive Technologies and the Social Organization of Meaning. Folia Linguistica. 35(1/2): 79–97. . ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemke, J. 2003. Texts and Discourses in the Technologies of Social Organization. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (eds.) Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity: 130–149. Palgrave Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leontjev, A. N. 1984. Der allgemeine Tätigkeitsbegriff. In D. Viehweger (ed.) Grundfragen einer Theorie der sprachlichen Tätigkeit: 13–30. Akademie-Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Link, J. 1988. Über Kollektivsymbolik im politischen Diskurs und ihren Anteil an totalitären Tendenzen. kultuRRevolution. 17/18: 47–53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maas, U. 1984. Als der Geist der Gemeinschaft eine Sprache fand. Sprache im Nationalsozialismus. Westdeutscher Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maas, U. 1989a. Sprachpolitik und politische Sprachwissenschaft. Suhrkamp.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maas, U. 1989b. Sprache im Nationalsozialismus. Analyse einer Rede eines Studentenfunktionärs.InK. Ehlich (ed.) Sprache im Faschismus: 162–197. Suhrkamp Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maingueneau, D. 1987. Nouvelles tendances en analyse du discours. Hachette.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, J. R. 2002. Voicing the ‘Other’: Reading and Writing Indigenous Australians. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (eds.) Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity. 199–219. Palgrave Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meeuwis, M. & J. Blommaert. 1994. The ‘markedness model’ and the absence of society. Multilingua 13(4): 387–422. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mey, J. 1994 [1974]. Pragmatics. Blackwell. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pêcheux, M. 1982. Language, semantics and ideology. MacMillan. . ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pêcheux, M. 1988. Discourse – structure or event. In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture: 633–650. MacMillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelinka, A. & R. Wodak. 2002. Dreck am Stecken. Politik der Ausgrenzung. Czernin Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reisigl, M. & R. Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. Routledge. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reisigl, M. & R. Wodak. 2009. ‘The Discourse-Historical Approach’. In Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (eds.) Methods of CDA: 87–121. Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rickford, J. 1986. The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics. Language and Communication. 6: 215–221. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, J. & Wodak, R. 2009. ‘Visual Argumentation in Racist Discourse’. Controversia 2: 45–77.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sauer, C. 1989. Nazi-Deutsch für Niederländer. Das Konzept der NS-Sprachpolitik in der Deutschen Zeitung in den Niederlanden 1940–1945. In K. Ehlich (ed.) Sprache im Faschismus: 237–288. Suhrkamp.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sauer, C. 1995. Sprachwissenschaft und NS-Faschismus. Lehren aus der sprachwissenschaftlichen Erforschung des Sprachgebrauchs deutscher Nationalsozialisten und Propagandisten für den mittel- und osteuropäischen Umbruch? In K. Steinke (ed.) Die Sprache der Diktaturen und Diktatoren: 9–96. Carl Winter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiffrin, D. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Blackwell. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scollon, R. 2001. Mediated Discourse. The Nexus of Practice. Routledge. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scollon, R. & S. Scollon. 2002. Nexus analyis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, J. B. 1988. Critical Hermeneutics. (4th edition). Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Titscher, S., R. Wodak, M. Meyer & E. Vetter. 1998. Methoden der Textanalyse. Westdeutscher Verlag (English translation 2000, Sage). . ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vološinov, V. I. 1973 [1928]. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Seminar Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, G. 1992. Sociolinguistics. Routledge. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. 1996. Disorders in Discourse. Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. 2000. Recontextualisation and the transformation of meaning: a critical discourse analysis of decision making in EU-meetings about employment policies. In S. Sarangi & M. Coulthard (eds.) Discourse and Social Life: 185–206. Pearson Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. 2004a. Discourses of Silence: Anti-Semitic Discourse in Post-war Austria. In L. Thiesmeyer (ed.) Discourse and Silencing: 124–156. John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. 2004b. Critical discourse analysis. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium & D. Silverman (eds.) Qualitative Research Practice: 197–213. Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. 2008. Introduction: Terms and Concepts. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyżanowski (Eds.) Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 1–42. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Palgrave. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R., J. Pelikan, P. Nowak, H. Gruber, R. de Cillia & R. Mitten. 1990. Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter. Suhrkamp. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. & B. Matouschek. 1993. ‘We are dealing with people whose origins one can clearly tell just by looking’. Discourse and Society 4(2): 225–248. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R., F. Menz, R. Mitten & F. Stern. 1994. Die Sprachen der Vergangenheiten: öffentliches Gedenken in österreichischen und deutschen Medien. Suhrkamp.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R., R. de Cillia, M. Reisigl & K. Liebhart. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh University Press (2nd edition 2009). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. & T. van Dijk (eds.)2000. Racism at the Top. Drava. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. & M. Meyer (eds.) 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage (2nd edition 2009). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. & M. Reisigl. 2002. “…wenn einer Ariel heist …” Ein linguistisches Gutachten zur politischen Funktionalisierung antisemitischer Ressentiments in österreich. In A. Pelinka & R. Wodak (eds.) “Dreck am Stecken”: 134–172. Czernin Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. & R. de Cillia. 2006. Language and/in Politics. In K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopaedia for Language and Linguistics: 707–719. Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. & Koller, V. (eds.)2008. Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. De Gruyter. . ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. 2009. ‘Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory, and methodology’. In Wodak, Ruth & Meyer, Michael (Eds.) Methods of CDA: 1–33. Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woolard, K. 1985. Language variation and cultural hegemony. American Ethnologists. 12: 738–748. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Cotrău, Diana
2022.
Ideologized Identities in the Romanian e-News. A Cultural Sociolinguistic Query of Converged Media Texts on the 2022 Russia-Ukraine Conflict.
Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia 67:4
► pp. 85 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.