Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Terminology: Volume 3. Legal Terminology
Edited by Łucja Biel and Hendrik J. Kockaert
[Handbook of Terminology 3] 2023
► pp. 224–241

On the interaction between legal and religious concepts

| KU Leuven (University of Leuven)
| KU Leuven (University of Leuven)
Legal concepts differ in each individual society reflecting the differences in that society (Cao 2007, 2010). They form part of nationally contained legal systems with their own terminological apparatus and underlying conceptual structure, their own rules of classification (Šarčević 1997). These differences have both semasiological and onomasiological perspectives. Some areas of the Moroccan law offer a good illustration for these idiosyncratic features as they are marked by peculiar characteristics, reflecting the prevalent political, social and religious realities. In this chapter, we will shed light on the interaction between law and religion, showing how this interaction manifests itself in the Moroccan Family Code (Moudawana). The study will be carried out from semasiological and onomasiological angles.
Keywords: legal concept/term, onomasiology, semasiology, religion, family law, system-bound concept, conceptual asymmetry, partial equivalence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Interaction between religion and law
  • 3.Methodological considerations
  • 4.Religious origins of the Moroccan Family Law legal terminology
  • 5.Semasiological dimensions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives (CC BY-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hot.3.int2
References (35)
References
Abū Ḥanīfah, 1994. Musnad Abū Ḥanīfah, edited by Naẓar Muḥammad Al-Fāryābī. Riyad: Maktabat Al-Kawṯar.Google Scholar
Al-Bayhaqī. 1991. Ma‘rifat al-Sunnan wa l-’Āṯār, edited by ‘Abdulmun‘im ’Amīn Qal‘ağī. Aleppo: Dār Al-Wa‘ī.Google Scholar
Al-Būṣīrī. 1999. ’Itḥāf al-Ḫiyarah al-Maharah bi-Zawā’id al-Masānīd al-‘Ašarah, edited by Yāsir Bin ’Ibrāhīm. Riyad: Dār al-Waṭan li l-Našr.Google Scholar
Al-Ğaṣṣāṣ. n.d. ’Aḥkām Al-Qur’ān. Beyruth: Dār Al-Kitāb Al-‘Arabī.
Al-Hilali, Muhammad Taqi-ud-Din and Muhammad Muhsin Khan. 1996. Noble Quran. English Translation of the Meaning and Commentary. Saudi Arabia: King Fahd complex for the printing of the Holy Quran.Google Scholar
Ali, Abdullah Yusuf. 2001. English Translation of the Holy Quran. Delhi: Kitab Bhavan.Google Scholar
Al-Qāsim Bin Salām. 2007. Al-’Amwāl, edited by Sayyid Bin Rağab. Riyad: Dār Al-Faḍīlah.Google Scholar
Al-Šāfi‘ī. 2001. Al-’Umm, edited by Rif‘at Fawzī ‘Abduluṭṭalib. Alexandria: Dār Al-Wafā’.Google Scholar
Alsulaiman, Abied. 2009. De Marokkaanse Familierechtelijke Documenten: Norm, Realiteit en Vertaalproblematiek. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ghent.
. 2011. ’Iškāliyāt al-takāfu’ al-waẓīfī fī al-tarğamah l-qānūniyyah: qānūn al-’usrah al-maġribī ’unmūḏağ-an [The problems of functional equivalence in translating legal texts: the Moroccan Family Law as a case study]. Turjuman 20(2):11–66.Google Scholar
Austin, John. 2007. Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law, Vol. 1. New York: Henri Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Baamir, Abdulrahman Yahya. 2016. Shari’a Law in Commercial and Banking Arbitration: Law and Practice in Saudi Arabia. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barzilai, Gad. 2007. “Introduction.” In Law and Religion, edited by Gad Barzilai, XI–XXVIII. Aldershot: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bobrowicz, Ryszard. 2018. “The Inverted Relationship: Constitutive Theory of Law and the Enforcement of Orthodoxy in Book XVI of the Theodosian Code.” In Law, Religion and Tradition, Vol. 1, edited by Jessica Giles, Andrea Pin & Frank S. Ravitch, 87–118. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cao, Deborah. 2007. Translating Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Legal Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 191–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelcke, Dörthe. 2019. Reforming Family Law, Vol. 55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2009. Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Malcolm. 2002. “What’s So Special about Legal Translation?” Meta 47(2):177–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibn ’Abī Šaybah. 2008. Muṣannaf Ibn ’Abī Šaybah, edited by ’Usāmah Bin ’Ibrāhīm Bin Muḥammad. Cairo: Dār Al-Fārūq.Google Scholar
Ibn, Rushd and Muhammad Abdul-Rauf. 1994. The Distinguished Jurist’s Primer: A Translation of Bidāyat Al-Mujtahid, Vol. 2. Berkshire: Garnet & Ithaca Press.Google Scholar
Id-Youss, Lahousseine. 2016. Concept System Construction: a Step toward Better Legal Communication. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leuven.
ISO 10241-1. 2011. Terminological Entries in Standards. Geneva: International Standards Organization.Google Scholar
Itani, Talal. 2014. Quran in English: Modern English Translation. Clear and Easy to Understand. [URL]
Kircher, Ingrid A. 1986. The Kanaks of New Caledonia, Vol. 209. London: Minority Rights Group Publications.Google Scholar
Mālik. 1997. Al-Muwaṭṭa’, edited by Baššār ‘Awwād Ma‘rūf. Beyruth: Dār Al-Ġarb Al-’Islāmī.Google Scholar
Robbers, Gerhard. 2010. Religion and Law in Germany. Zuidpoolsingel: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Sa‘īd, Bin Manṣūr. 1993. Sunnan Sa‘īd Bin Manṣūr, edited by Sa‘d Bin ‘Abdullāh ’Āl Ḥamīd. Riyad: Dār Al-Ṣumay‘ī.Google Scholar
Šarčević, Susan. 1989. “Conceptual Dictionaries for Translation in the Field of Law.” International Journal of Lexicography 2(4):277–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Challenges To The Legal Translator.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, edited by Peter M. Tiersma and Lawrence M. Solan, 187–199. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strong, Augustus Hopkins. 1907. Systematic Theology: A Compendium and Commonplace, Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Griffith & Rowland Press.Google Scholar
White, John Jr. 1995. “The Three Uses of Law: Toward a Protestant Theory of Criminal Law.” In Religion, Public Life, and the American Polity, edited by Luis E. Lugo, 176–198. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Zanzig, Thomas. 1996. Christian Meditation for Beginners. Winona, Minnesota: Saint Mary’s Press.Google Scholar
Zepp, Ira G. 2000. A Muslim Primer: Beginner’s Guide to Islam, Vol. 2. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar