Cover not available
Part of
Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development
Edited by Hagen Peukert
[Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 4] 2015
► pp. 323–344

The nature of the initial state of child L2 grammar

Contributions from the syntax of clitics

| Center for Albanian Studies, Institute of Linguistics
This chapter explores the rarely documented acquisition of clitics in bilingual children with L1 Albanian, a language with clitics, while they are learning English, a language without clitics. The first study reported here uses the case study methodology, while the second study uses the elicited production methodology. The case study brings forth new evidence of a preverbal object clitic stage in English L2 learning even though English does not have preverbal object clitics. The follow-up elicitation production study with 6 children, including the one from the case study, shows that the initially reported clitic stage disappears after another month of exposure, with the initial state grammar already having restructured to the properties of the L2. These findings are discussed in relation to the theories on the initial state of grammar in L2, as well as the theories on L1 transfer in the context of their analysis of object clitics.
Keywords: Albanian, case study, elicitation production, English, L2 initial state, object clitics, restructuring
Published online: 29 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hsld.4.14kap
References (47)
References
Adiv, E. 1984. Language learning strategies: The relationship between L1 operating principles and language transfer in L2 development. In Second Languages: A Crosslinguistic Perspective, R. Andersen (ed.), 125–142. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Belletti, A., & Hamann, C. 2004. On the L2/bilingual acquisition of French by two young children with different source languages. In Prévost & Paradis (eds), 147–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. A First Language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffield, N., White, L., Bruhn de Garavito, J., Montrul, S. & Prévost, P. 2002. Clitic placement in L2 French: Evidence from sentence matching. Journal of Linguistics 38: 487–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S., Flynn, S. & Martohardjono, G. 1996. Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 19: 677–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. The strong continuity hypothesis: Some evidence concerning functional categories in adult L2 acquisition. In The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition, S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono & W. O’Neil (eds.), 61–77. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Eubank, L. 1993-1994. On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition 3: 183–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Optionality and the initial state in L2 development. In Hoekstra & Schwartz (eds), 369–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Negation in early German-English interlanguage: more valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research 12: 73–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S. (1996). A parameter-setting approach to second language acquisition. In Handbook of Language Acquisition, W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds), 121–58. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, S. & Martohardjono, G. 1994. Mapping from the initial state to the final state: The separation of universal principles and language-specific principles. In Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Perspectives, Vol. 1: Heads, Projections and Learnability, B. Lust, M. Suñer & J. Whitman (eds), 319-335. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Granfeldt, J. & Schlyter, S. 2004. Cliticisation in the acquisition of French as L1 and L2. In Prévost & Paradis (eds), 333–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T. & Crago, M. 2011. Object clitics and their omission in child L2 French: The contributions of processing limitations and L1 transfer. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 31: 39-78.Google Scholar
Hamann, C., & Belletti, A. 2006. Developmental patterns in the acquisition of complement clitic pronouns: Comparing different acquisition modes with an emphasis on French. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 31: 39–78.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. 1997. L2 acquisition by a Turkish-speaking child: evidence for L1 influence. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, E. Hughes, M. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds), 245-256. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Herschensohn, J. 2004. Functional categories and the acquisition of object clitics in L2 French. In Prévost & Paradis (eds), 207–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, T. & Schwartz, B.D. (eds). 1994. Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T.J. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M. & Moselle, M. (1994). Re-examining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult second language acquisition in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 73–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapia, E. 2010. The Role of Syntax and Pragmatics in the Structure and Acquisition of Clitic Doubling in Albanian. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
Kapia, E & Kananaj, A. 2013. Clitic acquisition in 6-7 year old Albania speaking bilinguals. Language Impairment in a MultilingualSociety, Cost Action ISO804 8th Meeting. Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon.
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marinis, T. 2000. The acquisition of clitic objects in Modern Greek: Single clitics, double clitics, clitic left dislocation. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 15: 260-283.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. 2004. The relevance of specific language impairment in understanding the role of transfer in L2 acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 25: 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Platzack, C. 1996. The initial hypothesis of syntax: A minimalist perspective on language acquisition and attrition. In Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition: Empirical Findings, Theoretical Considerations, Crosslinguistic Comparisons[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 14], H. Clahsen (ed.), 369-414. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. & Paradis, J. (eds). 2004. The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. 2006. The phenomenon of object omission in child L2 French. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9: 263– 280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, V. 2009. Syntactic Development in the Second Language Acquisition of French by Instructed English Learners. PhD dissertation, Newcastle University.
Slabakova, R. 2000. L1 transfer revisited: The L2 acquisition of telicity marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian native speakers. Linguistics 38: 739–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, R. 1997. The acquisition of German and the ‘Initial Hypothesis of Syntax’: A reply to Platzack. In German: Syntactic Problems – Problematic Syntax, W. Abraham & E. van Gelderen (eds.), 307–317. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12, 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., & Tsimpli, I. (1991). Linguistic modularity? A case study of a “savant” linguist. Lingua 84: 315–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towell, R. & Hawkins, R. 1994. Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Cleveland: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tsakali, V. 2006. The Syntax and Acquisition of Pronominal Clitics: A Crosslinguistic Study with Special Reference to Modern Greek. PhD dissertation, UCL.
Tsakali, V. & Anagnostopoulou, E. 2008. Rethinking the clitic doubling parameter: The inverse correlation between clitic doubling and participle agreement. In Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 130], D. Kallulli& L. Tasmowski (eds), 321–357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakali, V. and K. Wexler (2004). Why children omit clitics in some languages but not in others: New evidence from early Modern Greek. In J. van Kampen and S. Baauw (eds.), Proceedings of the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (2003), vol. II. Utrecht: LOT Publications, pp. 493-504.Google Scholar
Vainikka, A. 1994. Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition 3: 257–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A. & Young-Scholten, M. 1996. Direct access to X’-theory: evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (eds), 265–316.Google Scholar
White, L. 1990. Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 121–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 1: 337–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Clitics in L2 French. In Clahsen (ed.), 335–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Second language acquisition: From initial to final state. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, J. Archibald (ed.), 130–155. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yuan, B. 1998. Interpretation of binding and orientation of the Chinese reflexive ziji by English and Japanese speakers. Second Language Research 14: 324–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The status of thematic verbs in the second language acquisition of Chinese. Second Language Research 17: 248–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar